Audi - better than Benz and BMW? Why

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Gebo
I agree with the very last sentence. +1

"If you are buying a German luxury car for its reliability, I think you are buying it for the wrong reasons."


It's well known that they're luxury cars, not known for their reliability. I did give a ride to someone and he thought the high price meant it was extra reliable. I laughed.

I got mine because I liked the gadgets it has. I don't really like the base models like the A4/C class because they don't have any special options that don't show up on a regular car. Like most cars don't have a power trunk closer on a sedan. You can actually open and close the trunk from inside the car.
 
Back in the day- Audi was known for its all wheel drive, BMW for handling, and M-B for solid luxury. Now all three have pretty much converged.
 
Originally Posted By: Mr Nice
My ex GF mom had an Audi 5000 and was not happy with the reliability.

If I could afford an AMG Benz I would buy one.


Audi 5000 was last made in 1983!!!35 years ago. By that logic dont buy a ford since pintos are bad cars
 
I guess I'm giving my age away.
wink.gif
 
This past weekend we bought the 2018 MB GLE350 and though expensive we wanted a new ride.

Debated a Volvo and BMW and I was against a BMW from the get go, though we all liked the Volvo (2nd on the list).

I was told by my many friends who own Japanese and German vehicles that the steel gauge on the Euros are far far better than the US and Japanese makers. They are different and self assuring ride.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: raaizin
Originally Posted By: Mr Nice
My ex GF mom had an Audi 5000 and was not happy with the reliability.

If I could afford an AMG Benz I would buy one.


Audi 5000 was last made in 1983!!!35 years ago. By that logic dont buy a ford since pintos are bad cars


Well you mentioned Pinto so it's a good time for this:



As for AMG Benz, there's the E55 AMG which is typically under 20k, some under 15k and if they're beat, under 10k.

For some reason, the AMG wagons hold their value better than the regular AMGs.
 
There is a lot of subjectivity here.
As someone who drove BMW's all his life, from E30 to now E70, I am not objective.
That being said, BMW compare to Audi is more drivers car due to several things:
1. It is RWD based unlike Audi. While we here in the US almost in 100% of cases get Quattro, Audi in Europe mostly comes in FWD configuration.
2. Engine in Audi "Hangs" over front axle. Very good in deep snow, not so much carving curves. In BMW engine is behind front axle. Very good in carving curves, not so good in deep snow or working on engine.
3. While Audi has good engines, nothing in 6cyl department compare to BMW inline 6 engine, gas or diesel. BMW there is just ahead of everyone, period.
4. In V8 department, BMW is opposite of 6cyl dept. They constantly have issues. Recently they got their act together with N63TU engines, and these new modular engines.
5. Audi has better quality interior, but a lot of gimmicks there, as it is becoming trend generally.

That being said, few days ago FINALLY got my hands on Dodge Durango R/T. I will need bigger SUV and thinking Mercedes GL, VW Atlas, Dodge Durango R/T.
Mercedes is floaty, there are issues with air suspension, and coming from BMW it feels like Buick. VW Atlas is ridiculously underpowered. However, I was really, really surprised by Durango. Great engine (even better sound), ZF8 transmission (same like in Audi and BMW, though not as fast and aggressive as in BMW). It is cheap inside, not as tactile as my X5, BUT, here is what I liked:
1. Compare to current X5, steering wheel feels better (not even close to E70 BMW, but then, no SUV has steering feel of E70). It is electric, but feels ok.
2. No gimmicks. No 1000 driving modes etc.
3. There is coolant temp. gauge (thank you very much) and you can set up oil temp gauge (thank you very, VERY much).
4. There is OIL DIPSTICK! Hello people!!! Car has OIL DIPSTICK! No new BMW has one. I like to check on my own oil. I do not need Chinese made sensor to tell me how much oil is in engine.

Problem with Germans is that they became ridiculously over engineered but now in wrong departments. Electronic gimmicks, various set ups etc. As many said here, BMW is going for after more customers, and cars generally feel soft, EXCEPT BMW 2 series. Who knows BMW's will buy M240i with stick shift. There is no German car on market that compares to that. Audi has RS3, fine, but it is not RWD, it is not longitudinal engine. Same with Mercedes A class. With BMW 2 series you get proper drivers car, longitudinal inline six, RWD!
 
Last edited:
They are all great until it comes time to fix them. V engines in small bodies are almost always a nightmare, all three are equally guilty.
 
Originally Posted By: mightymousetech


All cars are like that now, Germans are no different. There is a reason why most of the techs here at Acura drive BMWs, myself included. They are actually quite easy and cheap to work on. I know many techs at other dealers, and I would NEVER own an Audi or MB.


^^This

Any modern vehicle is extremely complicated. Your average Chevy has just as many electronically controlled systems as anything else. These aren't the days of old pickups with 350 V8s. My GF has a 2006 BMW 325i. The car has had a few issues like the water pump/thermostat, starter and front control arms. Besides that it has been flawless and is a very solid car to drive with no squeaks or rattles. The difference between German cars and others is the dealerships, like previously mentioned. On my GF's car the dealership wanted over 900 bucks to change the control arms. I bought them online for $60, and swapped them in an hour. Literally two bolts per side holding them on. A headlight went out last week and there is a door in the fender well to access it (see below). Probably one of the easiest headlights to change. Certain things on this car are a bit more difficult, but most common repair items are pretty straight forward. This is really where knowing how to DIY makes the difference over those who don't.

pic06.jpg
 
Originally Posted By: Mr Nice
Affluent folks that buy a new Audi, BMW or Benz don't keep them long enough to deal with the problems 4-5 years down the road.

It's the people buying them used with no warranty that find out just how expensive these German vehicles are to repair.



"The most expensive car you can buy is a cheap, used Mercedes."
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: edyvw

That being said, few days ago FINALLY got my hands on Dodge Durango R/T. I will need bigger SUV and thinking Mercedes GL, VW Atlas, Dodge Durango R/T.
Mercedes is floaty, there are issues with air suspension, and coming from BMW it feels like Buick. VW Atlas is ridiculously underpowered. However, I was really, really surprised by Durango. Great engine (even better sound), ZF8 transmission (same like in Audi and BMW, though not as fast and aggressive as in BMW). It is cheap inside, not as tactile as my X5, BUT, here is what I liked:
1. Compare to current X5, steering wheel feels better (not even close to E70 BMW, but then, no SUV has steering feel of E70). It is electric, but feels ok.


Its very interesting to hear you say that, especially as you are someone with a pro-BMW bias. When my wife needed a new vehicle and wanted an SUV a few years back, we shopped pretty much all the available rear-drive or RWD-based 4WD SUVs (FWD, transverse engines, and I will never meet again if I have any say in the matter). It came down to the Grand Cherokee (same chassis with a shorter wheelbase as the Durango), and the X5. Both my wife (not a car person) and I felt that the X5 more or less handled like a barge. Very much NOT what I would have expected from BMW. The JGC is not exactly a corner-carver, as you said, but its at least very stable and responsive. The X5 wallowed like a 71 Cadillac Fleetwood and had an extremely disconnected feel. We tried a couple because we thought maybe the first one had a mechanical problem. I've never mentioned that because I figured I'd get nothing but mockery, but it was a very clear difference in favor of the WK2 chassis. I later had an X3 rental and it was much tighter, but too small and the ZF shifter in it was even more balky and counter-intuitive than the one in the WK2.
 
Originally Posted By: mightymousetech
Originally Posted By: GON
I have a 2008 BMW 335i coupe .... Both are very reliable


Really?


Only two issues were recalls. One for the fuel pump, one for a wire harness issue. Never had a breakdown because of them.

We are older drivers, maybe that has something to do with it????

The 335i has been great.
 
From my rather limited experience, owning only 1 German car (E39):

- As mentioned earlier, these cars (particularly the 6 cyl) are easy to work on with easy parts availability and parts on par with Japanese brands. They DO need frequent, normally small, repairs.
- I am amazed at how little rust this 18 year old car has. My 10 year old Subaru is 3x worse. Part of the excessive German engineering appears to include choice and grade of materials (ignoring the plastic cooling system, LOL).
- The only person I've known that has had both BMW and Mercedes considers it no contest. He claims the Mercedes is just a better car and more reliable.
- My indie mechanic that specializes in imports (particularly German cars) claims Audi is the brand he most dislikes to work on. Says they are just more difficult in general.

My belief is that you should be prepared to either do as much of the work yourself or budget a tidy sum for repairs.
 
I would say a lot of it is just advertising as far as claiming Audi is better. I'm assuming this has something to do with Audi's recent improvements in consumer reports and other reliability ratings.

To me something fishy is going on, since many of the reports that show Audi near the top also have Volkswagen near the bottom, when the two share many parts.
 
Originally Posted By: 2008wrx


Why are you buying a Audi?


Wait what? I'm not. Not even my subconscious wants to passively accept that suggestion.
 
Originally Posted By: GON
Originally Posted By: mightymousetech
Originally Posted By: GON
I have a 2008 BMW 335i coupe .... Both are very reliable


Really?


Only two issues were recalls. One for the fuel pump, one for a wire harness issue. Never had a breakdown because of them.

We are older drivers, maybe that has something to do with it????

The 335i has been great.


Impressive. Surprised you have not been hit by the wastegates on the turbo, injector issues or the water pump yet. My sister got hit by all three, and at only 50k km.
 
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum
Originally Posted By: edyvw

That being said, few days ago FINALLY got my hands on Dodge Durango R/T. I will need bigger SUV and thinking Mercedes GL, VW Atlas, Dodge Durango R/T.
Mercedes is floaty, there are issues with air suspension, and coming from BMW it feels like Buick. VW Atlas is ridiculously underpowered. However, I was really, really surprised by Durango. Great engine (even better sound), ZF8 transmission (same like in Audi and BMW, though not as fast and aggressive as in BMW). It is cheap inside, not as tactile as my X5, BUT, here is what I liked:
1. Compare to current X5, steering wheel feels better (not even close to E70 BMW, but then, no SUV has steering feel of E70). It is electric, but feels ok.


Its very interesting to hear you say that, especially as you are someone with a pro-BMW bias. When my wife needed a new vehicle and wanted an SUV a few years back, we shopped pretty much all the available rear-drive or RWD-based 4WD SUVs (FWD, transverse engines, and I will never meet again if I have any say in the matter). It came down to the Grand Cherokee (same chassis with a shorter wheelbase as the Durango), and the X5. Both my wife (not a car person) and I felt that the X5 more or less handled like a barge. Very much NOT what I would have expected from BMW. The JGC is not exactly a corner-carver, as you said, but its at least very stable and responsive. The X5 wallowed like a 71 Cadillac Fleetwood and had an extremely disconnected feel. We tried a couple because we thought maybe the first one had a mechanical problem. I've never mentioned that because I figured I'd get nothing but mockery, but it was a very clear difference in favor of the WK2 chassis. I later had an X3 rental and it was much tighter, but too small and the ZF shifter in it was even more balky and counter-intuitive than the one in the WK2.

This new X5 (F15) is a garbage. It is BMW attempt to get Lexus customers. The electric steering wheel reminds me of rental Hyundai Sonata from 2007 I once drove. My wife's Tiguan has more composure over bumps then new X5. Driving X5 E70, which puts smile on my face every time I sit in it, and driving F15 when they perform some work on always troublesome SCR on my diesel, is like going from Ferrari to Pinto. Yes F15 is nicer inside, but too many gimmicks, suspension soft, not composed etc. There is a reason why BMW fell from No.1 luxury brand in US to I think now No.3. It is just a fact. BMW right now has just one proper driving model in line up, BMW 2. If I get Durango R/T probably i will get BMW 128i or newer M235i with stick, just because they drive soooo good.
That F15 X5 to get to drive good you need to order with adaptive drive, which of course once it brakes is going to cost you one of kidneys (there is just no other way around it).
On maintenance note, I agree with some people. BMW's are much cheaper to maintain then popular opinion would suggest (now those new ones with adaptive drive might be different story). Soon I will replace brakes, and for example I paid two front rotors, Brembo, $124, ATE pads $74. Rear rotors were $80 (Pagid) and pads (ATE) $56. I do work on my own, but BMW is really not expensive to maintain unless you drive diesel and have to deal with emission stuff (and that is problem with all new diesels, not BMW per se). But, gassers even in E70 I have do not have oil dipstick and for example there were instances when sensor failed and did not report proper level of oil. That is something I just cannot get over. One of the reasons (other then ridiculous mid-range torque) I got this diesel is that it has oil dipstick.
But on topic of Durango, yes it has some cheaper materials (not any cheaper then VW Atlas), but transmission is good (it is ZF after all), engine is simple but strong (I need something with plenty torque at this altitude) and that SUV just drives good. It is bit on hefty side (almost 5,500lbs) but again, drives good, has MB platform but no air suspension except in the back with tow package. You sit in it, turn on, turn off ECO (that start/stop system) and you move on.
In F15 you sit, you turn off start/stop, set up suspension to sport, every time you turn off goes into comfort. You have to drive a bit to check oil, which might be good, or bad, you just have to trust sensor. But I guess it makes difference that you have gauges on iDrive that tells you how much hp you using or torque. That is more important then coolant gauge I guess.
 
Last edited:
I believe that quality is perception. There is no clear definition of quality and that would be difficult as quality can be described in a number of ways and goals.

When I purchased my 1995 Toyota Tacoma brand new, it was at the top of the quality lists back then. The mechanical and body portions did show quality but the interior, while put together very tightly consisted of a very thin hard shell dashboard and interior trim that was also very thin. This was a pickup though and my goals were not to have a luxury interior.

Expectations of consumers play a big role as well. In the last year or so we have seen a big push towards soft touch interiors and elements that make the interior feel more luxurious. My Mazda certainly achieved this with their “class above” thinking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom