I'm planning a maintenance schedule for my 08 Toyota Land Cruiser (5.7 V8 w/ Aisin AB60 trans). I'll be using Amsoil engine, transfer, and crank case oil, but figured I should stick with Toyota WS for the tranny, as deviating from OEM ATF is sacrilegious in most auto circles. Long story short, I'm now second guessing that wisdom and considering a couple alternatives.
1) Amsoil Signature ATL. Main reasons are that Amsoil has a very long, well-established track record making great products in the US. There are tons of rave reviews about their fluid, with many claiming it improved shifting or noise or temps over OEM fluid. Also, it's fully synthetic vs. Toyota WS which is at best, a blend. Here are specs:
2) Idemitsu type TLS-LV WS ATF. Although Amsoil says it is "compatible with" WS fluid, it's not specifically engineered to match the properties of WS fluid. Idemitsu TLS-LC on the other hand is specifically formulated for WS transmissions, but unlike Toyota WS it is full synthetic like Amsoil. It also has a slightly lower pour point and Brookfield viscosity (implying it may perform better in cold conditions), yet retains exact same kinematic viscosity at 40C (23) and 100C (5.3). You'd think this would mean it would have a slightly better viscosity index than WS, but for some reason it's a tiny bit lower (175 vs 177). Not sure what that's about. Can anyone clarify why this may be???
3) Toyota WS. I'd feel much better about this fluid if it were full synthetic. Maybe I'm off-base, but it's my understanding that although conventional oils have gotten much better over the years, the best conventional will not be as good as the best synthetic in most respects. It seems like this is just cost-cutting, profit maximizing measures by Toyota. Of course I could be wrong on this. That's why I'm here checking with the experts.
Here's what I'm seeing, correct me if I'm off-base. The specs on the Toyota WS actually look very good, generally "better" than Amsoil, especially viscosity index, which is important. But I know specs don't often tell the full story, and these are pretty basic specs sheets at that. The Idemitsu is again, almost identical to properties of the WS, but it's synthetic and may be a little better in extreme cold. For this reason I'm tempted to go that route, but Idemitsu doesn't have anywhere near the track record and rave reviews of Amsoil. I've looked at other options like Mobil WS, Totachi WS, and Ravenol. Ravenol seems a lot like the idea behind Idemitsu, but I can't find published specs/data on it, so that's a red flag. MaxLife ATF looks like a competitor to Amsoil and it is actually certified for use in Toyota Aisin transmissions, but it just doesn't get the same level of rave reviews and people claiming it fixed existing issues. So I still think it's pretty much between OEM Toyota WS, Amsoil SS ATL, or Idemitsu's synthetic WS.
I should mention I'm not too worried about price. Land Cruisers are expensive vehicles that can easily go 500k+ miles, and I plan to keep mine a very long time. I don't mind spending an "extra" $20-$30/gallon on fluids to keep her in tip-top shape.
Also, I plan to change ATF every 50k miles. Does this seem reasonable for an Aisin AB60 trans with rare to occasional heavy use towing, off-roading, etc.?
I know there is an amazing amount of wisdom on this forum. I'd love your thoughts, suggestions, corrections, etc. Thanks fellas!
1) Amsoil Signature ATL. Main reasons are that Amsoil has a very long, well-established track record making great products in the US. There are tons of rave reviews about their fluid, with many claiming it improved shifting or noise or temps over OEM fluid. Also, it's fully synthetic vs. Toyota WS which is at best, a blend. Here are specs:
2) Idemitsu type TLS-LV WS ATF. Although Amsoil says it is "compatible with" WS fluid, it's not specifically engineered to match the properties of WS fluid. Idemitsu TLS-LC on the other hand is specifically formulated for WS transmissions, but unlike Toyota WS it is full synthetic like Amsoil. It also has a slightly lower pour point and Brookfield viscosity (implying it may perform better in cold conditions), yet retains exact same kinematic viscosity at 40C (23) and 100C (5.3). You'd think this would mean it would have a slightly better viscosity index than WS, but for some reason it's a tiny bit lower (175 vs 177). Not sure what that's about. Can anyone clarify why this may be???
Here's what I'm seeing, correct me if I'm off-base. The specs on the Toyota WS actually look very good, generally "better" than Amsoil, especially viscosity index, which is important. But I know specs don't often tell the full story, and these are pretty basic specs sheets at that. The Idemitsu is again, almost identical to properties of the WS, but it's synthetic and may be a little better in extreme cold. For this reason I'm tempted to go that route, but Idemitsu doesn't have anywhere near the track record and rave reviews of Amsoil. I've looked at other options like Mobil WS, Totachi WS, and Ravenol. Ravenol seems a lot like the idea behind Idemitsu, but I can't find published specs/data on it, so that's a red flag. MaxLife ATF looks like a competitor to Amsoil and it is actually certified for use in Toyota Aisin transmissions, but it just doesn't get the same level of rave reviews and people claiming it fixed existing issues. So I still think it's pretty much between OEM Toyota WS, Amsoil SS ATL, or Idemitsu's synthetic WS.
I should mention I'm not too worried about price. Land Cruisers are expensive vehicles that can easily go 500k+ miles, and I plan to keep mine a very long time. I don't mind spending an "extra" $20-$30/gallon on fluids to keep her in tip-top shape.
Also, I plan to change ATF every 50k miles. Does this seem reasonable for an Aisin AB60 trans with rare to occasional heavy use towing, off-roading, etc.?
I know there is an amazing amount of wisdom on this forum. I'd love your thoughts, suggestions, corrections, etc. Thanks fellas!