- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 2,335
If I had a capable drone, I'd take care of it myself. No more balloons in my side of the sky.
It has perfect control of it's location along the high altitude winds. It has the ability to maneuver and loiter.
If I had a capable drone, I'd take care of it myself. No more balloons in my side of the sky.
It mostly certainly does have propulsion . Something the size of three charter buses with a control center just doesnt float around willy nilly, stay around the same area then exit.However, as someone mentioned to me it's not really easy to guide a balloon without propulsion so they could have just messed up. DOD surely has enough intel on what needs to be done about it.
Why not put holes in it so it drifts down.
Your enemy is always both laughably weak and a powerful existential threat.The DOD isn't worried about it because the 110 Instamatic on board has a jammed film cartridge.
And they were constantly firing on the SR-71 and it flew well above 80,000ft.I think I saw a mention of 86,000' ? I don't know where the cut-off between national airspace (where commercial flights can fly over, with permission) and "intercontinental" airspace is though. The USSR shot down our spy plane flying over their airspace and the U2 can fly "above" 70k feet (real max altitude is probably classified). We didn't retaliate there because I think even the US would admit we were kinda in the wrong.
Thoughts?
"US and China have long mapped out all missile and other military sites in each other's country more efficiently using satellites at high attitudes. China admits ownership of the wayward weather research balloon, blown out of course by the east-flowing jet stream air current. To think of it as a spy balloon is mindless nonsense. It is slow, uncontrollable and a sitting duck even to a New York policeman's bullet
With over 30 years in defense industry I agree, we have capability to collect all RF data by our surveillance aircraft. Just like we’re doing in Ukraine war. I also have a feeling that eventually US is going to down it over the water so that we can study the hardware.The only legit reason I can think of for NOT shooting it down is to collect frequencies from the package.
Underestimate a man of action at your peril.ummm.... I'm trying not to laugh. What might that do here?
I agree with this - the only reason i can think its being allowed to continue is they are either waiting to collect it intact or trying to figure out how to collect it intact.With over 30 years in defense industry I agree, we have capability to collect all RF data by our surveillance aircraft. Just like we’re doing in Ukraine war. I also have a feeling that eventually US is going to down it over the water so that we can study the hardware.