Yes, but the e-mail that was shared with that information had details about the original XG wrong in it, so there were some red flags. We discussed it in one of the very long threads on the subject, that's why I think it would be really good to see some actual test data.
And that's a cute angle they took about it allowing more media, but the reality is that it requires
more media because a blend doesn't flow as well as fully synthetic at the same efficiency
Yeah, he did the board one heck of a favour and I'm not sure he was properly recognized for it. I haven't seen him post anything in ages. I'd love to see the EaO, TG and current XG tested.
As I think I mentioned earlier, here's a goldie oldie from AMSOIL, 98.7% at 15 microns:
View attachment 113666