Yes and no, reliability is subjective... Overall a hood switch not being plugged in properly causing an error message doesn't constitute a reliability issue to me. It doesn't prevent the vehicle from running and driving fine (if not better with start/stop disabled haha), and a loose nut or bolt on a non-essential component, same thing, whatever... but on the other hand, if they can't plug in a connector til it clicks or check to see if all the hardware is tight can we trust them to actually assemble important stuff properly?Yet-vehicles are more reliable than they have EVER BEEN..........
I personally believe we reached a peak of vehicle reliability in the late 90s to mid 2000s. Computers/tech did help cars run better for longer with less minor repairs, but now we've gone too far with an airplane's worth of tech, sensors, modules, etc. as well as other stuff like GDI, small displacement turbo engines, CVTs, etc. that just don't seem to hold up as well long-term.
Unfortunately, this issue affects the entire industry, not just Chrysler/FCA/Stellantis stuff. In fact I would be LESS hesitant to buy a Chrysler/Dodge now than 15 years ago. Not because they have got so much better but because pretty much every vehicle from every make has the same technology, features, etc. all coming out of the same factories by the same OEMs with a different sticker and maybe software slapped on there.
Again, I'm not bashing Chrysler/whatever it's called this week, in fact a new base Dodge Charger is probably a more reliable car than a new Nissan Altima, simply because it doesn't have a CVT, I'm pointing out that reliability is subjective and from what we've seen with certain trends in the automotive industry, long-term reliability is down.