Amsoil S3K HDD 5W30, 4323 oil miles, 2000 Subaru Outback 2.5L

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
664
Location
Buffalo, NY
This UOA is from my 2000 Subaru Outback 2.5L 4cyl gasoline non-turbo.
This vehicle also runs an Amsoil BE-100 add-on bypass filter and Canton Racing Accusump (1 quart) for preoiling.
  • Oil: Amsoil Series 3000 HDD 5W30 Heavy Duty Diesel
  • Full flow oil Filter: Amsoil SDF36
  • Bypass oil filter: Amsoil BE-100
  • Engine: 4cyl 2.5L
  • Fuel type: Gasoline
  • Oil cap: 4.2 quart [+1.5 quart bypass]
  • Air filter: OEM
  • Lab: Oil Analyzers Inc. (Amsoil)
  • Makeup oil: None
  • Sample date: 12/20/05
  • Sample mileage: 99423
  • Oil miles: 4323
code:

Analysis (ppm)

Fe 2

Cr 0

Pb 5

Cu 2

Sn 1

Al 5

Ni 0

Ag 0

Mn 0

Si 3

B 0

Na 3

Mg 0

Ca 3739

Ba 0

P 1265

Zn 1325

Mo 0

Ti 0

V 0

Cd 0

Glycol NEG

Water%
Fuel%
Vis 40C NA

Vis 100C 11.8

Solids% TR

Soot NA

Oxd% 3.3

Nox% 18.6

TBN NA

TAN NA



RESULTS OF TESTS PERFORMED INDICATE: NO CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED

OIL IS SUITABLE FOR CONTINUED USE RESAMPLE AT NEXT REGULAR INTERVAL


One note I have is that I added about 12 fl.oz. of Schaeffer's #132 Moly E.P. Treatment to this oil, but the sample results show zero moly.

(For reference, link to URL from Amsoil S3K 5W30 HDD in my 96 Subaru Legacy.)
 
These results seem suspicious.

First the results show No Moly (when it should show some); second, the viscosity reading is quite questionable as well...baseline for this oil is 11.7cst, the #132 should thicken it much more than 0.1cst...

BTW, why is there no TBN reading? Doesn't Oil Analyzers run TBN on all samples?
 
Thanks for the comments Michael Wan. I think I will contact the lab about the TBN. I have had a few other samples analyzed by this lab and the TBN was not included on those either. Maybe it's because these vehicles are supposed to be on the Amsoil 'tri-gard' plan. The results form looks a little different from the regular analysis form. But yet TBN is an important value to know, no?

I thought more about the zero moly result and it does make sense. I would expect about 1ppm moly in this sample based on the following. There was a discussion recently about the #132 Moly E.P. pointing to some VOA's 1 2 showing approx. 20-23ppm moly, and I diluted .375 quart #132 into about 5.8 quarts of oil for a total oil volume of about 6.175 quarts, so the oil should have maybe 1ppm moly (if my calculation is correct ->
20ppm*[.375qt/6.175qt]=1.2ppm

Not sure what to think about the viscosity you mentioned.

-Louis
patriot.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom