Amsoil ASM 0W-20 in a '99 Accord LX?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Patman,
I am guilty of exaggeration.
The minimum KV@100C = 5.6 for a twenty grade, and your UOA of this oil showed 7.0, which was the lowest KV@100C of the UOAs I looked at for Toyota 0W-20.



I had a lot of fuel dilution on that UOA too, but even with the lower viscosity, my wear numbers were very low.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
I want to see these studies that show any 0W-20 prevents wear better than any other 0W-20. Amsoil can't claim it - but other oils can? The argument goes along the lines of the thinner the better at start, and some amount of wear is at start up, therefor the thinner the better. I content any 0W-20 is plenty "thin" enough at start.



"thin enough" for what, though? For almost all conditions, any generic SM or SN 5W20 will provide "enough" protection for any engine for which it's spec'd. If your standard is "good enough", then Amsoil's entire product line would be obsolete, wouldn't it?

A disproportionate amount of wear happens at start-up and until the engine is up to operating temperatures. Oils which are thinner at start-up will pump more easily, at lower pressure, and get up to operating temperature more quickly. Therefore, it's really not too difficult for me to theorize that an oil that is thinner at startup is going to have less wear over the service life of an engine.

Obviously, oil viscosity isn't the only cause of start-up wear--deformation of the cylinder walls and pistons being another. But still, I really don't need an extensive study to convince me when I can simply look at the mechanisms in place that cause "wear". I'm also not of the myopic view that bearing wear is the only parameter of concern. I'm much more concerned about things that actually matter, such as wear at the valve stem seals, cam and main seals. Lower oil pressure over the life of the engine can't help but have a positive effect on the performance of these seals over the long-term. It's been demonstrated in SAE testing, and it's also a matter of simple physics--the lightest oil which doesn't leak creates the least amount of wear on an engine oil seal.

Sure, it would be nice for Toyota to do a protracted test to show that their oil is "better", but they're in the business of selling cars, not oil--so I'm not really holding my breath. But in the meantime, I'm going to look at the mechanisms that cause wear, and use my own noggin to pick an oil--and for me, the oil which a)meets my mfg specifications, b)is reasonably-priced and c)lightest at start-up is going to be the oil that gets the nod. But I also never lose sight of the fact that any certified oil (which actually meets the specs for which it claims) is "good enough". Then again, if "good enough" is the standard, there's not much sense in even having this forum.
49.gif
 
Take Amsoil out of this for conversation sake please. I specifically said ANY 0W-20, not Amsoil - and I would love to see a study of 60 1991 Accord LX's, 30 using the lowest HTHS, highest VI, lowest MRV vs 30 using a 0W-20 that is HTHS 2.8-2.9. People are saying and believing the first group will have the lowest wear on complete faith, is all I am trying to say.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Take Amsoil out of this for conversation sake please.


You get the context in which I mention Amsoil though, don't you? If you're going on the "good enough" standard, any premium product is going to be "unnecessary". So, replace Amsoil with "any premium synthetic" and my general point still stands.

Originally Posted By: Pablo
I would love to see a study of 60 1991 Accord LX's, 30 using the lowest HTHS, highest VI, lowest MRV vs 30 using a 0W-20 that is HTHS 2.8-2.9. People are saying and believing the first group will have the lowest wear on complete faith, is all I am trying to say.


I'd love to see that as well! But, we both know that's not going to happen. So, we're left with looking at the information which is available to us and making a decision. I do think there's more than "complete faith" at work though, at least for some people. There has been a lot published by the SAE, JSAE, and various oil companies which has addressed the matter of hths and engine wear. Overwhelmingly it seems that an hths of >2.4 it's what's needed to provide adequate/ideal lubrication in the the test engines (though this obviously varies depending on the study). But in short, I don't necessarily see an inherent advantage to the higher hths unless you need the margin of error from seeing extremely high oil temperatures.

Even in looking at your example above, the other big variable is driving conditions. There may be little/no benefit to using the lighter/higher VI for someone doing mostly highway miles. For the average driver doing mostly short trips with the oil rarely up to full temperature though, it's pretty easy to hypothesize that the thinner oil will result in "less" wear. But you're certainly right, all we really have is hypothesis to go on (though I would say there's more than "faith" involved in that hypothesis).
 
Originally Posted By: GGorman04
What is wrong with the original spec'd 5W30?


Nothing at all.
I could just as easily use 5w30 Edge SM, PU, PP, QSUD or G-Oil from the stash.
I just happened to pick up 16 quarts of Amsoil 0W-20 for $45.00 this past spring.
This was a craigslist find, in Columbus, where I happened to be going the following week.
A couple of emails and around ten miles of driving out of my way and the Amsoil was mine, along with a NIB Wix that fits no application I nor anyone I know who changes their own oil has.
 
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Take Amsoil out of this for conversation sake please.


We arent bashing AMSOIL, Pablo.

The 0W-20 seems like a very very good one! SSO, correct?

As for me, if i ever come across a car that has no issues with a thin oil and a thin 20 is fine, ill seek out the AMSOIL 0W-20 SSO over other 0W-20s. I know what i would use for a thick 20 thats actually a 30, but thats not the AMSOIL its Redline.

SSO = Signature Series Oil?
 
Originally Posted By: 45ACP
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Take Amsoil out of this for conversation sake please.


We arent bashing AMSOIL, Pablo.

The 0W-20 seems like a very very good one! SSO, correct?

As for me, if i ever come across a car that has no issues with a thin oil and a thin 20 is fine, ill seek out the AMSOIL 0W-20 SSO over other 0W-20s. I know what i would use for a thick 20 thats actually a 30, but thats not the AMSOIL its Redline.

SSO = Signature Series Oil?


I didn't think anyone was bashing Amsoil. I just wanted to talk about the subject without people assuming I'm coming only from one position. Yes the ASM 0W-20 is a Sig Series Oil, but SSO is the old product code for the 0W-30, which is now AZO.
 
So product code ASM=SSO?
I thought it might have been an earlier formula.
 
Gotcha.
So ASM 0W-20 is a Signature Series oil?
These seem to be really good long drain oils, with ample additive packs and little concern with current API specs.
The labels on the bottles that I have state that API SJ/SL are met or exceeded.
I'm guessing exceeded by quite a bit.
 
My friend had an 07 Fit purchased used with like 120,000 miles go at least 12,000+ miles to my knowledge on ASM 0w-20. I begged and pleaded for him to get a sample/send in a UOA. I don't think he ever did.
cry.gif


...didn't have his oil level drop off at all from the upper mark for what it's worth. I checked it with him on a long 1,000+ mile trip before and after...no oil consumption. That was around the 10,000 mile mark. He was going for at least 1 year or 15,000...

By the way, he got his best gas mileage with Amsoil. Over 50+ MPG on tanks of I believe 89 octane? He's been crazy OCD and trying to find the best fuel eco driving habits etc...probably the guy in front of you on the interstate that speeds up to 55 MPH and drops to 45, lol. P&G. Anyway, he uses a ScanGauge II, fwiw...he also swears by use of E-85 in 50% mixture with 'regular' E10 gas, or so, in order not to have a CEL due to ECU not being able to adjust fuel trims properly for that concentration of ethanol.

So, if OP would try a 0w-20 ASM is a good candidate, especially in winter. Like 'minimal' risks involved, get a UOA before summer and see how it looks, post it up here.
thumbsup2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: fdcg27
Gotcha.
So ASM 0W-20 is a Signature Series oil?
These seem to be really good long drain oils, with ample additive packs and little concern with current API specs.
The labels on the bottles that I have state that API SJ/SL are met or exceeded.
I'm guessing exceeded by quite a bit.


Yes it's now called a Sig Series Oil
Actually the oil complies with the additive requirements of ILSAC GF-5 and is marked API SN. You must have bottles that are a few years old.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom