Ambient Temperature vs. Viscosity Choice

Joined
Jan 18, 2003
Messages
330
Location
Dallas, TX
Having been around here for nearly two decades, I've read more comments talking about how people run higher viscosities when it's hotter outside, and vice-versa. This makes a sort of intuitive sense, as oils, even multigrade ones, thin out as temperatures increase. And that phenomenon explains why we'd want lower "W" numbers on multigrades as well- that indicates thinner oils at start-up temps, which are considerably cooler than within a warmed up engine.

But the part I can't quite square is the thinking that somehow a engine that specifies using 30 weight (or 20, 40, etc...) and has a say... 203 degree thermostat is going to somehow require heavier oil when the ambient temp is high outside.

The reason this doesn't really make sense to me is because the difference between "comfortable" and "super-hot" is like 25-35 degrees Fahrenheit, and is *still* 100 degrees F below the operating temp of the vehicle. The assumption is that the cooling system is so feeble that driving it in say... 105F temps is going to overwhelm the cooling system and necessitate higher viscosity to offset those temps. This would be the same if we're talking bearings, cams, etc.... the cooling system would have to be nearly ineffective for the ambient temp to really matter, provided the oil is in the right spec, as it's trying to keep everything right around 203, and the *internal* heat generated by combustion, in the bearings, etc... is what needs to be shed. The only place ambient temp comes into it would be in being able to shed the heat that the cooling system is moving from inside the engine to outside, and that's affected by the ambient temp. Even then, the main thing is going to be the internal heat generation rate, not so much the ambient temp, provided it's not something absurd like 120F outside.

What am I missing, if anything?
 
Having been around here for nearly two decades, I've read more comments talking about how people run higher viscosities when it's hotter outside, and vice-versa. This makes a sort of intuitive sense, as oils, even multigrade ones, thin out as temperatures increase. And that phenomenon explains why we'd want lower "W" numbers on multigrades as well- that indicates thinner oils at start-up temps, which are considerably cooler than within a warmed up engine.

But the part I can't quite square is the thinking that somehow a engine that specifies using 30 weight (or 20, 40, etc...) and has a say... 203 degree thermostat is going to somehow require heavier oil when the ambient temp is high outside.

The reason this doesn't really make sense to me is because the difference between "comfortable" and "super-hot" is like 25-35 degrees Fahrenheit, and is *still* 100 degrees F below the operating temp of the vehicle. The assumption is that the cooling system is so feeble that driving it in say... 105F temps is going to overwhelm the cooling system and necessitate higher viscosity to offset those temps. This would be the same if we're talking bearings, cams, etc.... the cooling system would have to be nearly ineffective for the ambient temp to really matter, provided the oil is in the right spec, as it's trying to keep everything right around 203, and the *internal* heat generated by combustion, in the bearings, etc... is what needs to be shed. The only place ambient temp comes into it would be in being able to shed the heat that the cooling system is moving from inside the engine to outside, and that's affected by the ambient temp. Even then, the main thing is going to be the internal heat generation rate, not so much the ambient temp, provided it's not something absurd like 120F outside.

What am I missing, if anything?
Here is what you are missing or what I think you are missing. Get an Infrared Gun and aim it at your oil pan when you get home. You can also install an Oil temperature Gauge if your car does not have 1. If the temp from an Infrared gun is not over 200 Degrees, this will mean your oil temp could be 20 degrees higher or so. You could also plug into the OB Port thing with a scanner and get a temp reading.

Realize that 2 thick of an oil can give you issues.

You live in Dallas, Texas just run a 5W-40 Oil.
 
Here are a few previous threads which may be of interest:

 
But the part I can't quite square is the thinking that somehow a engine that specifies using 30 weight (or 20, 40, etc...) and has a say... 203 degree thermostat is going to somehow require heavier oil when the ambient temp is high outside.

What am I missing, if anything?
Our last diesel pickup would drop oil pressure climbing mountain grades in the summer, towing our camper, about 17,500# gross. Hot coolant coming back from the radiator wasn't pulling enough heat from the oil via the oil cooler. It's a problem because the piston jets had check valves on them an would shut off somewhere below 28 psi. I'd generally downshift at around 35 psi and back out a bit. All of this typically happening before the fan clutch kicked in.

In cool weather, the radiator was more effective which kept cool water supplied to the oil cooler, and oil temperatures under control.

So there you have it, a concern relevant for oil viscosity in the heat. With a thinner oil, I could've lost piston cooling, which would've wasted the motor pretty quickly. With a thicker oil, more margin could've been had.
 
Here are a few previous threads which may be of interest:

how do you find so many threads? incredible.
 
Unlike coolant, oil temperature often isn't regulated at all. Some engines have oil-coolant heat exchangers , but they don't regulate temperature perfectly, and maximum oil temperatures might still vary by over 10°C seasonally.
 
Engines in automobiles are only partially cooled by the cooling system. A percentage of the heat radiates from the external surfaces of the engine including from the oil pan. As ambient temperatures increase, the heat transfer from the engine surface is less efficient, so sump temperatures can increase even though the coolant temps are constant.
 
Having been around here for nearly two decades, I've read more comments talking about how people run higher viscosities when it's hotter outside, and vice-versa. This makes a sort of intuitive sense, as oils, even multigrade ones, thin out as temperatures increase. And that phenomenon explains why we'd want lower "W" numbers on multigrades as well- that indicates thinner oils at start-up temps, which are considerably cooler than within a warmed up engine.

But the part I can't quite square is the thinking that somehow a engine that specifies using 30 weight (or 20, 40, etc...) and has a say... 203 degree thermostat is going to somehow require heavier oil when the ambient temp is high outside.

The reason this doesn't really make sense to me is because the difference between "comfortable" and "super-hot" is like 25-35 degrees Fahrenheit, and is *still* 100 degrees F below the operating temp of the vehicle. The assumption is that the cooling system is so feeble that driving it in say... 105F temps is going to overwhelm the cooling system and necessitate higher viscosity to offset those temps. This would be the same if we're talking bearings, cams, etc.... the cooling system would have to be nearly ineffective for the ambient temp to really matter, provided the oil is in the right spec, as it's trying to keep everything right around 203, and the *internal* heat generated by combustion, in the bearings, etc... is what needs to be shed. The only place ambient temp comes into it would be in being able to shed the heat that the cooling system is moving from inside the engine to outside, and that's affected by the ambient temp. Even then, the main thing is going to be the internal heat generation rate, not so much the ambient temp, provided it's not something absurd like 120F outside.

What am I missing, if anything?
In your example a 203 degree water thermostat doesn't control the oil temperature nor does it control the water temperature. It just opens at 203 to allow full passage of coolant past the thermostat housing.

The oil temperature is influenced by a lot of factors and just because water temperature is X doesn't mean oil temp is also X. That doesn't mean the cooling system is "nearly ineffective" because the radiator or air oil coolers can only exchange with the ambient temperature. It's a thermodynamics equation. Hotter ambient temperature means less offset to "trade" between air and fluid.

On a 70 degree day. My water temps can be 200, meanwhile oil temperature is 260.
On a 90 degree day. My water temps can be 210, meanwhile oil temperature is 280.

What am I missing, if anything?
Data. Since data like the oil pressure and oil temperature will inform any viscosity changes that are needed due to seasonal ambient temperature changes.
 
I consider it mostly the myth of personal exceptionalism. It goes both ways. "I am brave to start my car at minus five degrees Farenheit in my elite exclusive hunting cabin up north." "I have chosen a house in Phoenix, Florida where only hardened souls like myself can handle the 105'F heat with an 85' dewpoint."

Then, because the person struggles, they assume the car struggles too. It's mechanical empathy taken too far. I'm all for mechanical empathy-- I've seen people beating on machines-- but engines don't need it exclusively due to temperatures.

Every once in a while BITOG gets the nugget of someone wanting an oil that will survive their wife driving. 😁
 
I consider it mostly the myth of personal exceptionalism. It goes both ways. "I am brave to start my car at minus five degrees Farenheit in my elite exclusive hunting cabin up north." "I have chosen a house in Phoenix, Florida where only hardened souls like myself can handle the 105'F heat with an 85' dewpoint."

Then, because the person struggles, they assume the car struggles too. It's mechanical empathy taken too far. I'm all for mechanical empathy-- I've seen people beating on machines-- but engines don't need it exclusively due to temperatures.

Every once in a while BITOG gets the nugget of someone wanting an oil that will survive their wife driving. 😁
That's gotta be some kinda oil! 😂

Wife driving can be a lot like mother in law thermostat adjusting... 100% off or 100% on all the time.
 
interesting facts + opinions + i will add another, real synthetic groups IV + V oils react differently to temperatures than others!! there are a LOT of variables in driving habits as well, one size does NOT fit all
 
So there you have it, a concern relevant for oil viscosity in the heat. With a thinner oil, I could've lost piston cooling, which would've wasted the motor pretty quickly. With a thicker oil, more margin could've been had.
Right, but would that have been any different if it had been 40F cooler in the fall or winter? I somehow doubt it- your engine was kicking out way more heat than the cooling system could handle and that's why your temps were rising, not the outside temp. You needed better cooling, not necessarily heavier oil. Tomato-tomato, but it's not a function of weather when you come down to it.
 
On a 70 degree day. My water temps can be 200, meanwhile oil temperature is 260.
On a 90 degree day. My water temps can be 210, meanwhile oil temperature is 280.

I don't see that in my experience. On a 30 degree day, my water temps are around 203, and on a 105 degree day, they're exactly the same.
In your example a 203 degree water thermostat doesn't control the oil temperature nor does it control the water temperature. It just opens at 203 to allow full passage of coolant past the thermostat housing.

It's not an all-open/all-closed valve that just opens up at the set temp. Instead, it's a valve that's controlled by something called a 'wax thermostatic element', meaning that there's a container of a specific sort of wax in there with a piston, and that wax expands and contracts a specific way at specific temperatures.

So when the car's cold, that wax is solid, and the valve's closed. As the car heats up, it expands, opening the valve accordingly with the temp. And it does this continuously as the car is in operation. The whole thing is engineered to keep the temperature at the set-point, say 203. So if the incoming cooling water is above that, it opens up a little bit more because the wax expands a little bit more. If it is below that, it shrinks the wax a little, restricting the flow a little and bringing it back up to temp.

And I seriously doubt automakers engineer their cooling systems such that they're wide open at the operating temp. That's just idiotic- far better to give some cushion in there by setting the thermostat up such that it's got some wiggle room to open up further than that.

That's why I don't see the temps fluctuate- that thermostat's doing its job and keeping the water temp where it's supposed to, independent of outside temp.
 
Last edited:
My minivan has an oil temp gauge and I can tell you, the outside ambient temperature definitely has an effect on the oil temperature.
In anything below 90F, my oil temp will run about 185-190f when going down the highway or being stuck in stop and go.

Once the outside temp is around 100f, my heavy traffic oil temps can reach 210-220f range. Once I get going it will go down to 190F range.

Having said that, the difference in my vehicle doesn’t warrant a heavier oil.
 
Last edited:
Right, but would that have been any different if it had been 40F cooler in the fall or winter? I somehow doubt it- your engine was kicking out way more heat than the cooling system could handle and that's why your temps were rising, not the outside temp. You needed better cooling, not necessarily heavier oil. Tomato-tomato, but it's not a function of weather when you come down to it.
Actually, it's 100% a function of weather. The water returning from the radiator is a function of ambient temperature, airflow across the radiator, and at some point, engine load. Cooler ambient would have meant better heat rejection at the radiator.

I don't see that in my experience. On a 30 degree day, my water temps are around 203, and on a 105 degree day, they're exactly the same.


It's not an all-open/all-closed valve that just opens up at the set temp. Instead, it's a valve that's controlled by something called a 'wax thermostatic element', meaning that there's a container of a specific sort of wax in there with a piston, and that wax expands and contracts a specific way at specific temperatures.

So when the car's cold, that wax is solid, and the valve's closed. As the car heats up, it expands, opening the valve accordingly with the temp. And it does this continuously as the car is in operation. The whole thing is engineered to keep the temperature at the set-point, say 203. So if the incoming cooling water is above that, it opens up a little bit more because the wax expands a little bit more. If it is below that, it shrinks the wax a little, restricting the flow a little and bringing it back up to temp.

And I seriously doubt automakers engineer their cooling systems such that they're wide open at the operating temp. That's just idiotic- far better to give some cushion in there by setting the thermostat up such that it's got some wiggle room to open up further than that.

That's why I don't see the temps fluctuate- that thermostat's doing its job and keeping the water temp where it's supposed to, independent of outside temp.

The theremostat (and likely also your ECT probe) are on the water outlet of the engine. The thermostat is functioning to either send water to the radiator or through a bypass loop, back to the input of the engine. It's adjusting the input water temperature to keep the output the same. Under high load it recruits more cold (radiator) water to keep the ECT output the same. Under no load or during warmup, bypass flow dominates.

You are correct, thermostats open gradually across a range of temperature. As output is hotter, more flow is diverted from bypass to the radiator. So engine coolant output temperature is nearly constant. (This does not mean oil temperatures are constant. Quite the opposite actually.)

That is, until the radiator begins to saturate and warm water is coming back. This is when you will see temperatures rise, increasing heat rejection from the radiator and perhaps recruiting some radiator fan flow.
 
Last edited:
Engines in automobiles are only partially cooled by the cooling system. A percentage of the heat radiates from the external surfaces of the engine including from the oil pan. As ambient temperatures increase, the heat transfer from the engine surface is less efficient, so sump temperatures can increase even though the coolant temps are constant.
While I don't doubt that radiative cooling from the pan is significant, I'm not so sure it's affected by ambient temp nearly so much as airflow would be(conduction). And I'd think if it was useful or necessary to cool the oil pan like that, oil pans would have *real* cooling fins, not just shallow pretty grooves cut into them. Like a computer heat sink or something.
 
While I don't doubt that radiative cooling from the pan is significant, I'm not so sure it's affected by ambient temp nearly so much as airflow would be(conduction). And I'd think if it was useful or necessary to cool the oil pan like that, oil pans would have *real* cooling fins, not just shallow pretty grooves cut into them. Like a computer heat sink or something.
That would be convection, not conduction. I do remember a discussion on this in some automotive engineering class and if I recall correctly it was primarily convection cooling rather than radiation. But it depends of course on airflow, temperature differential and pan geometry (as you note).
 
Actually, it's 100% a function of weather. The water returning from the radiator is a function of ambient temperature, airflow across the radiator, and at some point, engine load.

What I'm getting at is that 20 or even 50 degrees Fahrenheit isn't going to affect your oil temp that much if your cooling system is functioning properly. Yes, the oil temp may vary a little b
That would be convection, not conduction. I do remember a discussion on this in some automotive engineering class and if I recall correctly it was primarily convection cooling rather than radiation. But it depends of course on airflow, temperature differential and pan geometry (as you note).
I wasn't sure; doesn't convection have to do with the actual convective motion of the fluid/gas? As in, it heats up, rises away from the heat source, and then cools and sinks?

Either way it's not radiation, but the action of the air over the pan that transfers most of the heat. And oil pans aren't really designed to transfer much heat.
 
I wasn't sure; doesn't convection have to do with the actual convective motion of the fluid/gas? As in, it heats up, rises away from the heat source, and then cools and sinks?

Either way it's not radiation, but the action of the air over the pan that transfers most of the heat. And oil pans aren't really designed to transfer much heat.
Convection can be either forced or natural. Forced is more effective at moving heat. In both cases the heat is transferred from the solid object to a liquid media that then moves across the surface.

Even so, convection involves conduction, because the heat had to be conducted through/along the oil pan, etc.

Conduction can also involve fluids, but the fluid would be static, so heat has to spread through the fluid media.

Radiation is different. It occurs even across a vacuum.

Undergrad thermodynamics was one week conduction, one week radiation. They are easily understood. The remainder of the semester was convection, most of it natural. It's the most difficult to understand/characterize which is why your wife always burns/undercooks dinner in the oven...which adds confusion to the topic. In modern kitchens we call them convection ovens. Really they're all convection ovens. The ones with a fan are forced, the ones without a fan are natural.
 
Back
Top