Originally Posted By: DuckRyder
Every Honda factory service manual I have seen says "inspect for damaged parts" if a non adjustable alignment measurement will not come into tolerance, I expect this one is no different. There are of course multiple aftermarket solutions, and it is possible that there is enough movement in the subframes or other suspension components to accomplish a meaningful change.
The thing that worries me about the conversation is that while the "red" camber is out of spec, as long as the car isn't leading it makes not a whit of difference, yet apparently no mention was made about the rear camber which is barely in tolerance and will very likely wear tires.
This whole "in spec" mentality irks me to no end, a good alignment technician knows that a car can be "in spec" and can still be unsatisfactory.
I have no idea why i keep typing "camber" for "caster", the front caster in red isn't a problem if the car isn't leading.
Originally Posted By: supton
As a side question, I know there are eccentric bolts for "fixing" camber issues. Wouldn't paying the typical $80-100 for an alignment include those bolts, if required? Or are those considered a "repair" item and thus billed separately?
Typical 4 wheel alignment prices don't include adding adjusters not present from the factory... doing so can range from trivial to quite involved so it would be hard to generically price it.
Originally Posted By: supton
Regardless: wouldn't an alignment shop "know" about them, and stock them, for this purpose?
For a common vehicle like a civic, typically yes.