For once I can keep a post short and will not answer this one
)
For those who stand up for privacy = Click
____

For those who stand up for privacy = Click
____
Last edited:
Yeah, duckduckgo.com in my default search engine. Also Amazon is not my top choice to choose for anything. I use it but always seem to find it someplace else at or better price.Pretty rare for me to use Google … only because the others are not quite as bad …
(same with Amazon … both too big for their britches) …
Funny-Forbes won’t let me read the article because I have “do not track“ enabled! Pretty ironic…![]()
You can manually add the associated Microsoft domains and leave 3rd party tracking turned off. In Chromium based Edge there's an icon for "site not working?" you can click and it will load all the cookies automatically.I can't even use the Office 365 admin tools with 3rd party cookies turned off.
Yeah, I'm not going to ever download an app from some pencilneck whiners like EFF. I'm glad they exist to bring light to things, but their esoteric privacy arguments are tiring.Here's a couple tips to folks who think they know a thing or two and have been surfing the web since ~1992 or so.
Get EFF Privacy Badger. It's free, but donate.
Go ahead and pay the man at HitmanPro. It really is one of the best at seeking and destroying malware. And trust me, this garbage comes from everyday sites, websites which everyone considers innocent. The free version works but the paid version is worth it and they deserve it.
No, nothing is perfectly private, but a few little things can keep the tracking bugs at bay. I was not paid for this rave.
I disagree.Otherwise, nothing to see here in general about the topic. We all knew Google was doing this already, this shouldn't be news to anyone. I have an Android phone and multiple Google smart devices in my home.
I was kinda thinking the same thing on a couple posts here. Passwords and password protection, yes much more important than browsing klingons. Yes. Ditto spam v. holy **** yeah you can have my vitals. Want that in 20's or 100's?You're making a pretty large leap from getting annoying spam calls to getting scammed out of your own house, dude.
You see it every day? Really?
You need to be concerned. Big brother is watching you.I have an iPhone, not concerned.
You need to be concerned. Big brother is watching you.
https://apnews.com/article/technolo...se-apple-inc-7fe2a09427d663cda8addfeeffc40196
Come on man. What have you got to hide?.......system could be used to frame innocent people by sending them seemingly innocuous images designed to trigger matches for child pornography. That could fool Apple’s algorithm and alert law enforcement. “Researchers have been able to do this pretty easily,” he said of the ability to trick such systems.
Oh no, I'm shaking in my bootsYou need to be concerned. Big brother is watching you.
https://apnews.com/article/technolo...se-apple-inc-7fe2a09427d663cda8addfeeffc40196
The problem here is that Apple is going to look through all of the pictures on your iPhone, and I assume pictures on their cloud servers tied to customer accounts. I'm not defending child molestors, I think they are scumbags, but the thought of a big corporation violating one's privacy to this extent should have most rational people more than a little concerned. I'm pretty sure that there are quite a few people (maybe the majority of people) that have pictures they would rather nobody else saw. This is exactly the same problem that Android users are facing with Google.Oh no, I'm shaking in my boots![]()
Did you read the article though? Nobody is looking at pictures unless their software detects it as inappropriate child content. I've got 3,500 pictures on my phone, and I'm one of millions with a phone. No company has the time or capacity to attempt that even on a .01% scale.The problem here is that Apple is going to look through all of the pictures on your iPhone, and I assume pictures on their cloud servers tied to customer accounts. I'm not defending child molestors, I think they are scumbags, but the thought of a big corporation violating one's privacy to this extent should have most rational people more than a little concerned. I'm pretty sure that there are quite a few people (maybe the majority of people) that have pictures they would rather nobody else saw. This is exactly the same problem that Android users are facing with Google.
Nobody is looking at my pictures.