B
Because someone will be willing to pay that much.Why is a $10 ball worth $5M?
Because someone will be willing to pay that much.Why is a $10 ball worth $5M?
Then someone is a freakin idiot. How is it any different from the one in the sporting goods store? Just because it was use by, at, or on?B
Because someone will be willing to pay that much.
That's the nonsense that some people buy into. In that case it's just souvenir.It's not the ball but what it represents.
Value is is subjective. It's no different than religious/cultural relics, artwork, etc.Then someone is a freakin idiot. How is it any different from the one in the sporting goods store? Just because it was use by, at, or on?
That's the nonsense that some people buy into. In that case it's just souvenir.
That's not the point. It's the perceived value of some ordinary object being thousands of times greater than what it is just because somebody famous used or owned owned it. If you want to equate that with vehicles, I once sold a Mercedes owned by a semi famous, or shall I say, infamous, race car driver. It brought no more than other similar models.When you sell someone a vehicle to you make a profit off it or do you do it for charity and "break even"?
He can afford to kick in some splash cash... He's a free agent and will sign somewhere for flat-out insane money.The event in monumental. Give the guy his ball.
Not really. If someone wants to pay whatever for this baseball, that called free market capitalism. The value of anything is what someone is willing to pay. Look at new cars today; MSRP is a joke when just 2 years ago no one paid MSRP.That's not the point. It's the perceived value of some ordinary object being thousands of times greater than what it is just because somebody famous used or owned owned it. If you want to equate that with vehicles, I once sold a Mercedes owned by a semi famous, or shall I say, infamous, race car driver. It brought no more than other similar models.
Okays so the market didn't place significant value on the driver in question.That's not the point. It's the perceived value of some ordinary object being thousands of times greater than what it is just because somebody famous used or owned owned it. If you want to equate that with vehicles, I once sold a Mercedes owned by a semi famous, or shall I say, infamous, race car driver. It brought no more than other similar models.
I know how you feel. I met the owner of the NY Giants at a golf event. I knew he was going to be there so I wore an EAGLES golf shirt. He was not amused. But then he doesn't look like the most cheerful guy anyways.As a Red Sox fan, I would not keep it (because cooties). I would happily sell it to Mr. Judge. He seems like a good guy. I might even ask for a photo op. Wearing my Sox cap, of course
Then someone is a freakin idiot. How is it any different from the one in the sporting goods store? Just because it was use by, at, or on?
That's the nonsense that some people buy into. In that case it's just souvenir.
You obviously are not a baseball fan and recognize what that actual ball represents. It's no different than someone paying a huge amount of money for a vehicle driven by some celebrity.Then someone is a freakin idiot. How is it any different from the one in the sporting goods store? Just because it was use by, at, or on?
That's the nonsense that some people buy into. In that case it's just souvenir.
You should have worn a Dallas Cowboys baseball hat as well .I know how you feel. I met the owner of the NY Giants at a golf event. I knew he was going to be there so I wore an EAGLES golf shirt. He was not amused. But then he doesn't look like the most cheerful guy anyways.
I would sell the ball to them today! Someone else might hit 63 next year, then the ball wouldn't be worth squat.Just seen on the news that an auction house is prepared to pay 2 million for the # 62 ball.
No idea, but apparently his balls are worth $700, not millions. https://www.mlbshop.com/aaron_judge...7TvpKffE2fWhDmOYBeuEcijUacRBzSskaAtc0EALw_wcBWho is Aaron Judge?