Have you seen the tail lights in question?Headlights are another manner and can be expensive. Taillights are not that complex or have to be light up in 4 different modes.
IIRC some new BMWs have OLED tail lights.
Have you seen the tail lights in question?Headlights are another manner and can be expensive. Taillights are not that complex or have to be light up in 4 different modes.
Aftermarket junk isn't exactly reliable, and it is very labor intensive.GM: “Each light in the housing has its own microconductor”
Congratulations GM, you took something the aftermarket has been doing for years, addressable LED’s, and made it far far more complicated and expensive for no apparent reason.
I know Audi uses OLED taillights in certain RS models. Has don’t for a few years.Have you seen the tail lights in question?
IIRC some new BMWs have OLED tail lights.
In what way(s) has GM made the lighting more complicated and expensive? To put it another way, what Has GM done that the aftermarket companies have not? Thanks.GM: “Each light in the housing has its own microconductor”
Congratulations GM, you took something the aftermarket has been doing for years, addressable LED’s, and made it far far more complicated and expensive for no apparent reason.
If you can afford to spend $100K plus for a Hummer EV, you can afford its tail lights and its fancy animationsNo idea what GM was thinking but here you go:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a...sive/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=news_tab
Since many here are showing poor reading comprehension:
One tail light assembly lists for $3045.48. Still expensive, but IMO not out of line on a car that sells for $120k+
Ok?2020 Mercedes-AMG S 65 Sedan $235,600
Tail light $540
https://mbparts.mbusa.com/oem-parts...2229067104?c=bD01NCZuPUR5bmFtaWMgU0VPIFBhZ2U=
$18k
And that's your opinion.Who cares if its a OLED or animated, it is a tail light for cripe sake, it does what a tail light needs to do perfectly fine. This is another perfect example of just because you can make it doesnt mean you should.
Doh! I thought it was PER tail light. Well that's a relief, what a great deal!$18k
People like fancy **** Trav.I have yet to hear anyone explain why a tail light needs to that complex. Obviously the one on S560 AMG works just fine and meets all the regulations and standards.
It just seems incredibly complex for no reason. GM’s answer doesn’t help that perception.In what way(s) has GM made the lighting more complicated and expensive? To put it another way, what Has GM done that the aftermarket companies have not? Thanks.
Wow, I can't imagine a Wrangler as a daily driver- especially with a Tahoe in the drive. Not a judge at all- just an observation. I owned a 2000 TJ. Was awesome for weekend errands. Would be a horrible daily driver IMHO. Heck, just having a conversation on a cell phone was brutal.
I'd take a Camry or corolla any day of the week over a Wrangler for a commuter vehicle.
Here is a pic of my 2000. Installed a fill traction lift and American Racing rims, and 33s. Fun toy- but would never be my commuter vehicle of choice. View attachment 121106
There is a huge difference in the cars quality, the Hummer is a 30-40K vehicle with a 30K battery and 10-15K in drive motors plus markup. The AMG has a hand built engine and lots of custom workmanship. You are tying to justify Rolls Royce parts prices on what is a basically a mediocre quality rolling GM iphone.As a matter of fact @Trav, what about the Mercedes with Swarovski crystals in the headlights? Those retail for over $6,500 each.
What about the S65 itself? Surely the S350 is enough. What moron would spend the money on an S65?