Originally Posted By: gogozy
thanks, is it possible they left out the 0w20 in GF-5 since most turbo application will specific something thicker? I wonder this mean 0w20 is still rate at GF-4 level for this test, and I can not find the GF-4 has any exclusion for 0w20.
I believe the 33C test is a new requirement for GF-5, so yes a GF-5 0w20 should exceed the requirements of GF-4.
Not sure what you mean by "thicker" 0w vs. 5w refers to oil performance in the range of -25c to -35c. 20 wt oils be they 5w or 0w can have a range of thicknesses at 100c. For instance Mobil 1 0w20 is thicker at 100c than Kendall GT-1 5w20 (8.7 and 8.2 cSt respectively).
thanks, is it possible they left out the 0w20 in GF-5 since most turbo application will specific something thicker? I wonder this mean 0w20 is still rate at GF-4 level for this test, and I can not find the GF-4 has any exclusion for 0w20.
I believe the 33C test is a new requirement for GF-5, so yes a GF-5 0w20 should exceed the requirements of GF-4.
Not sure what you mean by "thicker" 0w vs. 5w refers to oil performance in the range of -25c to -35c. 20 wt oils be they 5w or 0w can have a range of thicknesses at 100c. For instance Mobil 1 0w20 is thicker at 100c than Kendall GT-1 5w20 (8.7 and 8.2 cSt respectively).