Originally Posted By: oldmaninsc
Originally Posted By: jorton
I surely do not do 3000 mile o/c in my cars, but don't be critical of those who do. They're protecting their investments, and, it does not hurt their engines.
Those who do extended o/c or who follow the oil change sensor may be putting their cars at risk. 3k guys aren't.
Now that is funny! Following the "oil change sensor" is putting their cars at risk? How so? In the case of GM they put a lot of time and money into designing and testing their OLM (Oil Life Monitor). It's one of the few things I think GM did right!
I know someone who follows the OLM completely since buying his vehicle new. It sometimes takes him out to 11K - 12K between oil changes - on dino oil. The vehicle has over 150,000 miles, recently passed CA. smog and is still going strong. But I guess his engine is going to fail anytime now?!!!!
Nothing wrong with following the OLM. Only problem I see is when people use it as a dummy gauge in place of the old school routine that the service manuals still dictate.
When was the last time you saw anyone check their tire pressure and fluids while at the self-service pump? The few times I've seen it done were by cab drivers, whose living depends on their vehicle needing to go anywhere, anytime, and down time is also lost income.
Due to an on-call schedule, I am similarly religious about doing this every fill-up (at a minimum) - but I also consider my car a sound investment that has the potential to pay for itself through years of hassle free performance.
Most treat it like an appliance, and put as much thought and care into it. No need to check the oil level, because the dummy gauge will tell them when its low (or so they think).
Edit: it'll be interesting to see how the attempts at using technology to idiot proof have paid off when these cars are 10 or 15 years old. My prediction: not well.
-Spyder