Apparently some people here have not watchED the SEAHAWKS WIN GAMES!
2014-15 NFL Playoffs Thread
- Thread starter deven
- Start date
- Status
WOW looks like GB covered the spread....Seattle must be rocking.
And Seattle just proved again that defenses win championships!!
Originally Posted By: dblshock
Seahawks beat-up pansies last five weeks, now they're facing the MVP.
Brady will get it?
Seahawks beat-up pansies last five weeks, now they're facing the MVP.
Brady will get it?
I had to stop watching when they went into OT - too much stress - go Seahawks!!!
Originally Posted By: Vikas
wow, what a game!!!!
I still think OT rules are unfair. Both the teams should have had opportunity to get the ball.
Uh-huh.
Seahawks won fair and square. Why is is it when a team from the west wins, the rules aren't fair?
wow, what a game!!!!
I still think OT rules are unfair. Both the teams should have had opportunity to get the ball.
Uh-huh.
Seahawks won fair and square. Why is is it when a team from the west wins, the rules aren't fair?
Unbelievable! GB players/coaches and fans must be shell-shocked! Feel sorry for B. Bostick TE for GB. What a great lesson for the young Seattle QB and hanging in there till the bitter end! Great game. I think the Seahawks will win the SB.
Originally Posted By: Pablo
Originally Posted By: Vikas
wow, what a game!!!!
I still think OT rules are unfair. Both the teams should have had opportunity to get the ball.
Uh-huh.
Seahawks won fair and square. Why is is it when a team from the west wins, the rules aren't fair?
Yes, Seahawks won an excitement game, especially the last 4-5 minutes, fair and square.
But I agree with Vikas, the over-time rule gives the coin flip winner a chance to win the game(with a touch down) without giving the other team a chance to respond.
Originally Posted By: Vikas
wow, what a game!!!!
I still think OT rules are unfair. Both the teams should have had opportunity to get the ball.
Uh-huh.
Seahawks won fair and square. Why is is it when a team from the west wins, the rules aren't fair?
Yes, Seahawks won an excitement game, especially the last 4-5 minutes, fair and square.
But I agree with Vikas, the over-time rule gives the coin flip winner a chance to win the game(with a touch down) without giving the other team a chance to respond.
In almost all the type of coin tosses in a game, usually, the winning captain may decide to take defense or offence based upon lots of other thing including the current condition of the field etc.
Obviously, except here; you can NOT take defense if you win the toss! I thought the rules were recently changed or does that only apply to Superbowl?
Obviously, except here; you can NOT take defense if you win the toss! I thought the rules were recently changed or does that only apply to Superbowl?
That had to have been the worst meltdown I've ever seen in a championship game (not the biggest point comeback). GB was totally dominating that game and for about 7/8 of the game they had their foot over the throat of SEA, but they failed to finish. There's absolutely no excuse for letting this one get away. None. I give credit to SEA for not giving up, but this was GBs game and they gave it away....
People seem to think dominating a game the team doing that should win....they forget special teams, big plays and defense are out there playing the SAME game too. Sometimes those dominate too and in this case they did just that.
Originally Posted By: dblshock
Packers lost this game in Buffalo. as a whole these failures are systemic and really need to be addressed.
I disagree. GB dominated 7/8 of this game, and committed an inexcusable gack at the end of the game...home field advantage ended up not being a factor at all in this game...
Packers lost this game in Buffalo. as a whole these failures are systemic and really need to be addressed.
I disagree. GB dominated 7/8 of this game, and committed an inexcusable gack at the end of the game...home field advantage ended up not being a factor at all in this game...
- Status
