"2.1 sec 0-60" run then dust off a GT-R. Charge only went down from 80 to 79%

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've always wondered why some electric vehicles don't have some sort of solar material on the hood and/or roof. My car sits in the hot sun most every day. Even in the winter time the car is in the sun. Seems like sitting for 10 ~ 12 hours a day in the sun that a significant amount of energy could be transferred in to the batteries? Wonder why that's not doable?
300Wh per panel and room for 2. so at best you get 600 Watt/hour but in reality heat, shades, angling etc will reduce that to half or less. But lets call it 4kW a day... How large is that battery?
 
300Wh per panel and room for 2. so at best you get 600 Watt/hour but in reality heat, shades, angling etc will reduce that to half or less. But lets call it 4kW a day... How large is that battery?

100KWH @ 400V

How many volts do you think you can get out of two 300's in a series?
 
I haven't looked into how many volts vs amps the panels produce. But put them in series and double the voltage, put them parallel and double current. Anyways it stays 600 Wh maximum either way.
 
Having solar at home is not something everyone has. According to what I read keeping lithium ion batteries full isn’t good for them, and may be a cause of fires.
Examples, Apple iPhone I have restricts charging to later at night. Their reason is the battery will degrade less if not fully charged for the few hours. I realize ev cars already don’t charge all the way. Still lower charge is good for them, not higher charge. Not sure what Teslas buffers are.
Another is the Bolt fires. They decided to limit the charging level as a solution.
I can’t remember when I made a special trip to the gas station. I always get gas on the way somewhere and it’s not out of the way by more than 200 feet. 500 feet.
For my situation, a plug in works very well, 100% of my local driving is on free electricity. To get that free I get it where I go, but it is a hassle sometimes as more and more ev”s are competing for the chargers. It takes a lot of my time thinking about my car.
First world problems. There are people who can’t even get shoes, let alone any sort of car.
What really amazes me is the childish racing on the streets that’s being posed as a good thing to hope for. 0-60 in 2 seconds for what? Getting ahead of another machine to show speed of the machine, for what? People die in such things or kill others that’s why it’s illegal.
What was the topic again? I scrolled up, I wasn’t too far off.
Hopefully any buttplugs that purposely drive in an aggressive manner as often highlighted will take themselves out and of course get rid of more EVs in the process. I often see the videos of R/C cars taking on Teslas and truth be told an electric R/C and slot cars are really the ultimate electric rockets all things considered.
 
behind people who are feeding a family of four with hot dogs, nachos and big gulps, paying for it with food stamps, then buying lottery tickets and a money order to pay their rent because they don't have a bank account, not having panhandlers approach you while fueling with some story about having run out of gas on the freeway and needing a few bucks, not having to listen to some a-hole playing loud filthy language rap music at the pump island and giving you a look like I dare you to ask me to turn it down, and other niceties of being in public places in most large cities today.
You go to the same dang gas stations that I do :ROFLMAO:
 
The cars are really quick. They also handle really well due to the low canter of gravity. And you don't have to get a Plaid to enjoy the incredible driving experience. Any Tesla will do.
Regarding charging, these cars are different. You learn. If you want them to fuel up like an ICE vehicle, well, that ain't gonna happen.

But how many of your ICE cars start each day with a full tank and only visit a gas station on trips of over 200 miles?
None.
Not everyday, but I have several 400-500 miles days in a given month. So while I'm not against electric cars, I still have the need of taking on energy in minutes for another 200-400 miles.

An electric car may/will make sense once either my wife or I retire. But until then, the 5 minute refuel minutes or hours from my home makes more sense.

It's an obstacle that has to be resolved for electric cars to move from 1-2% of annual new car sales to a significant fraction.
 
Not everyday, but I have several 400-500 miles days in a given month. So while I'm not against electric cars, I still have the need of taking on energy in minutes for another 200-400 miles.

An electric car may/will make sense once either my wife or I retire. But until then, the 5 minute refuel minutes or hours from my home makes more sense.

It's an obstacle that has to be resolved for electric cars to move from 1-2% of annual new car sales to a significant fraction.
I agree with 90% of what you say. An EV does not make sense for you, unless you have another vehicle for tripping.

But you are incorrect in saying that has to be changed for higher adoption. The average distance driven per day is like 30 miles. And if you are right, why is every major manufacturer moving to electric powertrains? Are they stupid? (Don't answer that!)
 
I agree with 90% of what you say. An EV does not make sense for you, unless you have another vehicle for tripping.

But you are incorrect in saying that has to be changed for higher adoption. The average distance driven per day is like 30 miles. And if you are right, why is every major manufacturer moving to electric powertrains? Are they stupid? (Don't answer that!)
Are they moving because of consumer demand or regulatory pressure?

Absent regulatory pressure, if they were building e-vehicles then indeed it would be in response to consumer demand.

The distance people travel doesn't matter, it's the perception. There are a number of folks who cannot CURRENTLY use an EV as you suggest. One such population are those who live in urban settings with street parking. They cannot rely upon overnight charging in their garage because they don't have a garage. While my youngest daughter wanted to buy a plug in car, I asked her if there was a charging port on the street outside of her apartment. She answered no and we moved on to looking at used Prius choices.

Not everyone lives in suburbia with a one or more car garage where they can charge.

Folks who live alone can usually afford only one car, so they may have need of a vehicle that refuels/recharges in short time for those occasional trips. Many of these folks are too young to rent a fossil fueled car, so unless sellers are going to offer something to those folks on the occasions they need to go more than 200 miles in a day (or like we did on our vacation 3366 miles over the course of 12 days, or 280 miles each day.)

More have the need than you give credit to. Certainly not every day, but not everyone is a middle aged couple with multiple cars and in single family dwellings.
 
Are they moving because of consumer demand or regulatory pressure?

Absent regulatory pressure, if they were building e-vehicles then indeed it would be in response to consumer demand.

The distance people travel doesn't matter, it's the perception. There are a number of folks who cannot CURRENTLY use an EV as you suggest. One such population are those who live in urban settings with street parking. They cannot rely upon overnight charging in their garage because they don't have a garage. While my youngest daughter wanted to buy a plug in car, I asked her if there was a charging port on the street outside of her apartment. She answered no and we moved on to looking at used Prius choices.

Not everyone lives in suburbia with a one or more car garage where they can charge.

Folks who live alone can usually afford only one car, so they may have need of a vehicle that refuels/recharges in short time for those occasional trips. Many of these folks are too young to rent a fossil fueled car, so unless sellers are going to offer something to those folks on the occasions they need to go more than 200 miles in a day (or like we did on our vacation 3366 miles over the course of 12 days, or 280 miles each day.)

More have the need than you give credit to. Certainly not every day, but not everyone is a middle aged couple with multiple cars and in single family dwellings.
I have said many times EVs are not for everyone.
 
I have said many times EVs are not for everyone.
I think we are saying the same thing. We may differ on the sets that include folks who can use them.

I simply believe more infrastructure as well as faster charging have to be in place before you will see them break out to be more than 1-2% of car sales absent regulatory intervention.

If the market wanted them, we would already see EV sales at figures 10x where they are today. But price, infrastructure, and yes inertia in the consumer space all hold this number down.
 
EVs should charge at home by merely parking them. Not to be bothered with plugging in a cable. In Europe you must check your own tire pressure. Who does that? It's equally cumbersome, especially in the rain.

Let me build a solution with contacts rising from the floor, like a car lift. Or like on a Scalectrix car. And every household in the "EV world" should have 380/400Volt 3-Phase, like we have in Germany. The charge time must be under one (short) night.

If you are on a business trip, your hotel must recharge in 5-6 hours. Top up at coffee break and plenty of juice during a 1.5h lunch. Your navi can direct you and plan for you.

That will take a few years to develop.
 
EVs should charge at home by merely parking them. Not to be bothered with plugging in a cable. In Europe you must check your own tire pressure. Who does that? It's equally cumbersome, especially in the rain.

Let me build a solution with contacts rising from the floor, like a car lift. Or like on a Scalectrix car. And every household in the "EV world" should have 380/400Volt 3-Phase, like we have in Germany. The charge time must be under one (short) night.

If you are on a business trip, your hotel must recharge in 5-6 hours. Top up at coffee break and plenty of juice during a 1.5h lunch. Your navi can direct you and plan for you.

That will take a few years to develop.
You depending on a "coffee break" and a "one and a half hour lunch" is the the reason your country is in trouble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom