Got to love the folks who simply can't understand separating engineering perspectives of a fuel and the government side of it. I just wanted to know why the hate of ethanol from AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
From an engineering perspective only:
a) corrosion- ethanol itself has significant corrosion issues in pure state to most metals and swells many rubber like gasket materials. Add ethanol to fuels and some of these corrosion issues remain. The rate of corrosion is slowed but over time, well it only takes one weak point in the fuel system and there can be troubles.
b) affinity towards water. Pure ethanol won’t be pure ethanol for long if kept in an open or even a vented container - it will absorb water from the relative humidity in air. Add ethanol to fuel and you are likely adding water to the fuel too. Fortunately (?) the ethanol keeps the water in the gas solution and it usually doesn’t fall out as free water. But solubility of water in gas is a function of temperature so if the E85 gets colder then some limit you might have water falling out of solution. That water can freeze and then POW! a chunk of ice plugs up the fuel injection nozzle and well you know where that gets you.
c) sustainability and environmental considerations - Yes, the carbon from burning ethanol is does not increase the carbon in the atmosphere since the carbon came from photosynthesis using the CO2 naturally in air. However, the energy used to manufacture the farm fertilizers, run the farm equipment, process corn it in the production plant and transport the ethanol to blending sites etc. comes from fossil fuels. Ethanol is sold to the public as some kind of savior since it (pure corn derived ethanol) is carbon cycle neutral. That is a deception the Ethanol proponents are aware of but go out of the way to not correct.
The problem is that the government chose to ignore these engineering issues and sell the sizzle and ignore the smoke.