Originally Posted By: vtb
Ha ha ha. Let the good times roll. I really did not expect this kind of fervor as a result of the question I posted. I didn't even make any claims about M1, just asked why it is the most attractive subject for the discussions to turn into battles.
So, I've gathered that: fans and detractors of M1 feel equally as strongly about the oils shortcomings/benefits as compared to other oils.
I am not qualified to make any judgement on it, I've never even used it.
You left out one participate, the observer. I think M1, and XOM in general, make some great products. Some, imo, are/were the best. Probably the best line of lubricants in worldwide distribution. Hard to not give credit where it is due.
..but the reaction to criticism is the oddity. Not whether or not there is or is not a given issue with the product.
It's got very little to do with M1 itself. The un'splained anomaly is the human factor in rebuttal. It can't take it head on. It deflects, attacks, distracts, obfuscates ..etc.
I can't be the only one to see this.
statement: M1 engines showed cam wear while the rest of the fleet did not
Reactions:
Your sister treated you poorly when you were young
Your observational skills are flawed
You're obviously only a M1 basher
or, in Tig's case..
You're only an M1 honest John reporter/supporter basher (that is, now proclaiming himself a victim - further distracting the thread from the core topic)
Note that none of those responses, as tongue in cheek as they are, ever address the cam issue. Bringing absolutely NOTHING productive to the thread. Merely trying to confuse, frustrate ..and "tie it up in committee".
This is how it's done.