Another good video from Speedkar99..
Agree. Sacrificing a lot just to squeeze out mpg.IMO, cylinder deactivation is garbage.
You forgot to add "with the least amount of R&D and cost". GM has been using the technology for years no?I believe government mandated fuel efficiency regulations drive manufacturers to pull out their bag of tricks to achieve each small gain in efficiency.
The air in the cylinder can act as a spring. Close the valve at any point. If it tries to pull a vacuum, then when the piston comes back up the vacuum helps pull the piston back up. If tries to compress, then when the piston goes down the air pushes down.Learn something new every day. Thanks for posting. I thought cylinder deactivation just shut down injectors. Didn't know Honda was closing the valves as well. Seems dumb to create all that compression & vacuum for nothing.
They still including this system on their new cars?
Was there something they were trying to accomplish / avoid by closing the valves, versus just letting the combustion chamber breathe normally while not feeding it any fuel? Is the 'spring effect' what they were seeking? I would love to understand Honda's logic behind this. They really undercut their reliability reputation with this one. Hope it was worth it.
Yeah that's what I was thinking as well.Pure speculation. Because its a port injected motor and you don't want vapors that might be in the intake running through a non-running cylinder and a potentially cold converter.
Again, pure 100% speculation on my part.
Yes, the spring effect is basically the whole point. Otherwise you have pumping losses sucking fresh air in and shoving it back out. But it is the cause of all of the problems associated with cylinder deactivation. GM has problems with their system: in their case, they use special hydraulic lifters that are activated/deactivated by oil pressure, which is controlled by a solenoid valve. These lifters are prone to failure.Was there something they were trying to accomplish / avoid by closing the valves, versus just letting the combustion chamber breathe normally while not feeding it any fuel? Is the 'spring effect' what they were seeking? I would love to understand Honda's logic behind this. They really undercut their reliability reputation with this one. Hope it was worth it.
Was there something they were trying to accomplish / avoid by closing the valves, versus just letting the combustion chamber breathe normally while not feeding it any fuel? Is the 'spring effect' what they were seeking? I would love to understand Honda's logic behind this. They really undercut their reliability reputation with this one. Hope it was worth it.
Is this true? My impression is that there is always air being introduced even when throttle is closed and therefore should be injecting some minimum amount of fuel while coasting.Simply turning the fuel injectors off has already been implemented in just about every vehicle engine made in the last 20+ years (even ones without cylinder deactivation). Any time you take your foot off the gas and let the vehicle coast in gear, the computer shuts all of the injectors off. The only thing keeping the engine spinning is the wheels, until/unless you either step on the gas again, or if the RPM gets too close to idle speed, at which point the injectors will start squirting again.
Yes, it's true. Just because there's some air being introduced doesn't mean you have to inject fuel too.Is this true? My impression is that there is always air being introduced even when throttle is closed and therefore should be injecting some minimum amount of fuel while coasting.