- Joined
- Jun 8, 2022
- Messages
- 5,580
If you walk onto a lot here in the Southeast the vast majority of vehicles on the lot are FWD - or at least they were when they had vehicles on the lot. So it must be regional.
As driving skills decrease and cars are bought more for the number of cup-holders they have, the driver needs all the help she/he can get.The vast majority of Mazda and Subaru’s lineup are AWD now, and most of the used Lexuses I’ve been seeing are as well. It seems like there are a lot more full-time AWD vehicles than just a decade ago. Are these appealing to people who drive in the snow a lot? It just seems like you are paying extra for something else to go wrong. At least on my wife’s RAV4 you can turn it off when you don’t need it but that’s not the case with most I’ve seen. I read somewhere that many of the systems can’t tolerate even a small tire diameter mismatch, so if you damage a tire you have to replace the entire set?
I must officially be an old curmudgeon now because I want nothing to do with AWD vehicles other than a true 4x4 truck, and that’s not as a daily driver.
Agree entirely, same with the way they foist the "Turbo" on everything. The turbo is a great tool, but has its own quirks, yet no salesperson mentions them, nor how to drive & shut-off the engines that have them.Spend a Winter here and ask....
My issue w/ AWD is the way its sold. AWD is a great tool, especially with the ideal tires, but to the unaware/uneducated (about mechanical stuff)/oblivious, it can allow one to get way behind the curve and find the intersection with the laws of physics that much faster...and while carrying more energy
My wife’s 2009 was the absolute cheapest one on the lot. There's a big button on the dash you push to engage the AWD system, and it automatically disengages at 35mph.My wife has had 3 RAV4s. None of them had a way to turn off the AWD.
My wife's 2004 RAV4 developed a leak in the transfer case at around 250,000 miles that the shop wanted over $1000 to repair. Instead, I refilled it about every oil change and it lasted to 400,000 miles. Casually noticing other RAV4s of her vintage on the road became rarer and rarer over the years. After 15 years, whenever we saw one, we began to notice that most were the non-AWD models. Easy to tell on the RAV4s because the AWD models came with factory tinted glass and the 2WD models did not. If my wife didn't have me to refill the transfer case and facing a $1000 repair at 250,000 miles, she would have traded it in and bought a new one.
I forgot to mention this in my initial question. In an environment where manufacturers are recommending 0w-8 oils in an effort to squeeze out 0.01 extra mpg it seems like adding AWD to most of the fleet is taking them in the wrong direction with respect to CAFE.3. New AWD systems don’t exert big mpg penalty, they are not heavy etc.
I would take a Focus RS, or Golf R, without much complaint! I think they get it mostly right.I generally prefer RWD cars- particularly on the track. My C43 is the first AWD performance car I have purchased and I have to say I don’t find the AWD to be very intrusive- most likely due to the 31/69 F/R torque split, which allows a decent amount of rotation on turn-in.
Having said all that, you could not give me a FWD biased AWD vehicle- but that’s just me.