Interior good: Comfy seats, decently quiet on the highway except on grooved pavement, good amount of space when rear seats folded down. I really like the backup and 360 cameras; they are phenomenal. Heated steering wheel and seats are great.
Interior bad: Over reliance on touch screens. No headlight switch, have to go into a menu for it. No trip reset button, have to go three levels deep into menus for that. Over reliance on piano black materials. Impossible to read HVAC controls with sunglasses on during the day. Most switches in steering wheel are nonsensical and have no labels; it even has a low gear button on the steering wheel but at least it has an L on it. Windshield wiper switches are tiny and on the signal stalk; cannot be used while wearing gloves. The center screen which has the speedometer and whatnot has four modes; three of these modes lack a gas gauge, only giving you distance to empty. Base radio is pretty cruddy. You cannot use gloves with the touch screens; my 5 year old Toyota lets me use the touch screen with gloves on.
Driving good: Engine is very quiet and smooth. Good acceleration under most driving conditions. Blindspot protection was nice and provided ample warning. It also had cross traffic and pedestrian movement alerting when you are backing up which is really nice. I am legit impressed by the auto start stop; it’s flawlessly implemented, good job GM. Good turning radius; very easy to make city U-turns.
Driving bad: Horrendous acceleration in emergency/I need to move now moments; the transmission is set up for fuel economy so it takes about .75-1 seconds for the robots to figure out what you want and by then, you’ve missed your opportunity to go. It’s not quite dead-peddling, but close.
Fuel economy: Pretty bad. 22.7 MPG over roughly 470 miles with just two adults in the car. It had a 2WD/AWD mode button; I ran it in 2WD mode to get the most fuel economy but it was still bad. My prior rental RAV4 on this exact same trip, last February, had better acceleration and averaged 31 MPG with colder temps and similar driving conditions. I’d agree with Car and Driver’s assessment when they said “uncompetitive fuel economy”; Chevy is about two decades behind in this area.
Privacy: Really really bad. You have to submit to a bunch of Google services and other telemetry data collection to even use Apple CarPlay. My gut tells me that this thing will spy on you and report to many many data collection agents.
My own personal overall assessment: Comfy and good for rental service. I would not personally spend my money on buying one. The interior oddities are just a bridge too far for me and the fuel economy figures that are very reminiscent of the 1990s. There are better choices in the market if you are in the market for this size of vehicle. If the car was $22-24K range compared to the RAV4 at $29K, then it would may be competitive but with both in the $29K range, nope. My guess is that GM is going after loyalists with this one and not trying to win new customers.
Funny note: Something tells me that Chevy is ashamed of the fuel economy. When you click on “Fuel Efficiency” on their specifications page (at least on mobile) all it says is “Fuel Tank Capacity 15.6 Gal”. You have to go the fueleconomy.gov to get the figures. 24 city, 29 highway, 26 combined. My guess is that the 22-36 degree temps are what brought us down below 23 MPG on the highway.
Interior bad: Over reliance on touch screens. No headlight switch, have to go into a menu for it. No trip reset button, have to go three levels deep into menus for that. Over reliance on piano black materials. Impossible to read HVAC controls with sunglasses on during the day. Most switches in steering wheel are nonsensical and have no labels; it even has a low gear button on the steering wheel but at least it has an L on it. Windshield wiper switches are tiny and on the signal stalk; cannot be used while wearing gloves. The center screen which has the speedometer and whatnot has four modes; three of these modes lack a gas gauge, only giving you distance to empty. Base radio is pretty cruddy. You cannot use gloves with the touch screens; my 5 year old Toyota lets me use the touch screen with gloves on.
Driving good: Engine is very quiet and smooth. Good acceleration under most driving conditions. Blindspot protection was nice and provided ample warning. It also had cross traffic and pedestrian movement alerting when you are backing up which is really nice. I am legit impressed by the auto start stop; it’s flawlessly implemented, good job GM. Good turning radius; very easy to make city U-turns.
Driving bad: Horrendous acceleration in emergency/I need to move now moments; the transmission is set up for fuel economy so it takes about .75-1 seconds for the robots to figure out what you want and by then, you’ve missed your opportunity to go. It’s not quite dead-peddling, but close.
Fuel economy: Pretty bad. 22.7 MPG over roughly 470 miles with just two adults in the car. It had a 2WD/AWD mode button; I ran it in 2WD mode to get the most fuel economy but it was still bad. My prior rental RAV4 on this exact same trip, last February, had better acceleration and averaged 31 MPG with colder temps and similar driving conditions. I’d agree with Car and Driver’s assessment when they said “uncompetitive fuel economy”; Chevy is about two decades behind in this area.
Privacy: Really really bad. You have to submit to a bunch of Google services and other telemetry data collection to even use Apple CarPlay. My gut tells me that this thing will spy on you and report to many many data collection agents.
My own personal overall assessment: Comfy and good for rental service. I would not personally spend my money on buying one. The interior oddities are just a bridge too far for me and the fuel economy figures that are very reminiscent of the 1990s. There are better choices in the market if you are in the market for this size of vehicle. If the car was $22-24K range compared to the RAV4 at $29K, then it would may be competitive but with both in the $29K range, nope. My guess is that GM is going after loyalists with this one and not trying to win new customers.
Funny note: Something tells me that Chevy is ashamed of the fuel economy. When you click on “Fuel Efficiency” on their specifications page (at least on mobile) all it says is “Fuel Tank Capacity 15.6 Gal”. You have to go the fueleconomy.gov to get the figures. 24 city, 29 highway, 26 combined. My guess is that the 22-36 degree temps are what brought us down below 23 MPG on the highway.