Who makes quality 5w-40 oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
As always Clevy, you contribute nothing to a thread.

Originally Posted By: Clevy
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
The only point I have comparing T6 to Mobil 1 0W-40 within this thread is this:

In the extremely unlikely event the OP has an oil-related issue, SOPUS will NOT stand behind their product. Under the same technicality, an 0W-40 not being recommended by the manufacturer, Mobil 1 is the clear winner because:

1) The OP is risking warranty coverage with either product.

2) The use of Mobil 1 eliminates the whole additive/cat con debate.

T6 is NOT the ideal oil for this application, or any 40 grade oil for that matter. The OP does NOT need a 40 grade oil, he only thinks he does. Will T6 work? Of course, we already know it will. We also know that any 0W will work too. Other than that, I'm not hanging my hat on anything. I don't give a [censored] what he pours in the fill hole of his car so you are only arguing with yourself.



Pure comedy gold.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
2) The use of M1 eliminates the whole additive/cat con debate.


How ?
 
Because M1 certifies their product will not harm emissions systems. You won't get that with T6. Isn't really that simple?
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Because M1 certifies their product will not harm emissions systems.


Show me
 
http://s02.static-shell.com/content/dam/.../rotella-t6.pdf


Quote:
Protecting the performance of your exhaust-emissions control systems is not only important to ensure your vehicles comply with legislative requirements, but also to ensure efficient operations. For instance, blocked diesel particulate filters (DPF) can actually increase fuel consumption. Shell Rotella T6 is formulated with reduced levels of ash and sulphur to help maintain the efficiency of the latest and future vehicle technologies. Meeting the ash, phosphorous and sulfur requirements of API CJ-4, Shell Rotella T6 has been tested and proven to protect your vehicle


It's even got pictures...
showing what I stated earlier about having lower than HDMO allowed levels of additives, which allows it to meet S specs.

Interestingly, lower Sulfated Ash than Mobil 1 0W-40
 
I use Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck 5w40 in my Turbo S2000. The reason is simple. I've used Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck in many engines in the past, both turbo, non turbo, high performance and conventional performance, motorcycles too. In every case, Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck was directly responsible for better UOA results, sometimes significantly so.

I'll make no claims as to Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck being responsible for longer engine life, slower ring, piston, cam chain, bearing or cam wear when compared to other robust oils. I will say this:

Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck is a very high quality oil, has a "just right" HTHS for my performance engines and it's commonly available. Especially when it's "on sale" at autozone every other month. 5qts and Mobil 1 filter for $30-33 is hard to beat.
 
What is it you are arguing about?


Originally Posted By: Shannow
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
2) The use of M1 eliminates the whole additive/cat con debate.


How ?
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
1) You put yourself on a pedestal the moment you wrote, "Doug, Shannow, and I".

Read the quote again. I was clearly speaking about people who use HDEOs in gassers. Nonetheless, I'm quite pleased with what I've learned from both of them (and many others here) over the years.

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
2) I don't need a Harvard degree in literature to pick up on the underlying contempt in your reply to my post.

Our intelligence was insulted by Shell's email response; contempt was intended.

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
3) SOPUS will stand behind their "e-mail jockeys" if the OP has an engine/emission related issue while using T6.

Shell will have nothing to do with a potential warranty claim in such a case, except in very unique and limited circumstances. If Hyundai is absolutely satisfied that the owner used Rotella 5w-40, SM certified, as per the manual according to recommended OCIs, they won't even contact the oil company over a warranty issue. Shell would only be contacted if it was clear (and proven) that the oil they produced was out of spec. Then, that would be between Hyundai and Shell.

Additionally, it would be absolutely nonsensical for Shell to state that you cannot use Rotella 5w-40 SM in a vehicle calling for an SM rated 5w-40. You get certification for an oil then refuse to allow it to be used in those circumstances for which it's certified? You don't see an issue with that? Obviously, the email person in your quote was terribly confused. Oil companies have their oils certified by the API, ILSAC, ACEA, and manufacturers, not by people answering emails.

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
4) T6 is NOT the optimal choice in this application. Any bickering or bantering between us or others will not change that fact.

I never said it was or wasn't. It's an approved choice, and that's the issue.

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
5) Yes, you should stop posting for a while. Start by re-reading my epic (not my words) ML thread so when you reference it again you can speak intelligently.

If I recall correctly, your beef with the MaxLife ATF was that Ashland wouldn't stand behind their "meet or exceeds" wording, at least in your view. Fair enough. In this scenario, however, Rotella 5w-40 is an actual, bona fide licensed SM 5w-40, as per the manual directions. If one goes against the manual and listens to meet or exceed wording, it's different than using an actual certified product.

You'd be well advised to pay attention to what Shannow is stating about phosphorous levels and SA. And you're confusing marketing speak with certification. If one wants to get picky, Mobil 1 0w-40 does not fit the literal description of the manual requirements. Rotella 5w-40 does. They both have similar phosphorous levels, and Mobil 1 0w-40 is definitely higher in SA. Rotella 5w-40 and Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40 have ACEA specs that limit SA.

Shell's marketing people saying that Rotella isn't appropriate for gassers, even though it has SM is just that, CYA and marketing speak. You seem to have no problem with my use of Delvac 1 ESP. Is it because XOM and Imperial Oil say it's fine for high performance applications? I doubt that Infiniti would agree, since I'm out of spec. That's my choice.

If an engine specifies an SM 5w-40, I will reiterate that no one should hesitate to use the SM version of Rotella 5w-40 in such a case.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
As always Clevy, you contribute nothing to a thread.

Originally Posted By: Clevy
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
The only point I have comparing T6 to Mobil 1 0W-40 within this thread is this:

In the extremely unlikely event the OP has an oil-related issue, SOPUS will NOT stand behind their product. Under the same technicality, an 0W-40 not being recommended by the manufacturer, Mobil 1 is the clear winner because:

1) The OP is risking warranty coverage with either product.

2) The use of Mobil 1 eliminates the whole additive/cat con debate.

T6 is NOT the ideal oil for this application, or any 40 grade oil for that matter. The OP does NOT need a 40 grade oil, he only thinks he does. Will T6 work? Of course, we already know it will. We also know that any 0W will work too. Other than that, I'm not hanging my hat on anything. I don't give a [censored] what he pours in the fill hole of his car so you are only arguing with yourself.



Pure comedy gold.



Ha.
And you actually consider the drivel you post a contribution.

Like I said. Pure comedy gold.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
The only point I have comparing T6 to Mobil 1 0W-40 within this thread is this:

In the extremely unlikely event the OP has an oil-related issue, SOPUS will NOT stand behind their product. Under the same technicality, an 0W-40 not being recommended by the manufacturer, Mobil 1 is the clear winner because:


SOPUS doesn't need to stand behind the product (as Garak noted) because the OP is using a lubricant that falls within the requirements cited in the owners manual.

Quote:
1) The OP is risking warranty coverage with either product.


How is using a product that meets the specs outlined by the manufacturer risking warranty coverage?

Quote:

2) The use of Mobil 1 eliminates the whole additive/cat con debate.


No it doesn't. It has just as heavy an additive pack if not heavier.

Quote:

T6 is NOT the ideal oil for this application, or any 40 grade oil for that matter. The OP does NOT need a 40 grade oil, he only thinks he does. Will T6 work? Of course, we already know it will. We also know that any 0W will work too. Other than that, I'm not hanging my hat on anything. I don't give a [censored] what he pours in the fill hole of his car so you are only arguing with yourself.


Well you appear to be responding plenty to somebody who is apparently only arguing with themselves sir.
 
Not that I wish to be seen as someone with high credibility (because I am not)... I have an itch here I need to scratch. Though my post count is low, and my join date is recent, I've been viewing BITOG threads for a very long time, and let me tell you something Oil Changer - you are butting heads with the wrong people. Garak, Clevy, Shannow, and wemay (plus CATERHAM, tig1, and OVERKILL, but you've not responded to them yet so far [etc.] with them here) have proven their intelligence time and time again by providing responses with knowledge and experience to back it up the majority of the time (there are other members I'd also tip my hat to, but are not related to this thread at the time). Now, I am not saying they are the best Motley Crew of members here on BITOG, as even they have countered points amongst themselves... and yes, I know this is just my personal subjective view on the matter...

BUT, you [Oil Changer] had ought to think about what you are saying before you click that submit button. You are only making matters go unnecessarily personal by attacking the person instead of their posts.

I mean...

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer

As always Clevy, you contribute nothing to a thread.


This kind of thing is what makes it hard for OP's questions to get answers, because then the thread drifts off into nonsense. Clevy contributes a lot of helpful information.

I am in no way meaning to disrespect you, because what I am trying to teach you here is to show some respect, but I think you had ought to be a little more rational and reasonable than you are. Take this with a grain of salt, but don't disregard logic.
 
Garak, Still trying to figure out yours and Shannow's problem. I never once said the OP can't or shouldn't use T6 only that T6 is NOT the best choice in his application. Period. How many times have I said that already.

I did a cut/paste of an e-mail from SOPUS from another thread the last time this was brought up to provide a counter-point to the conversation. Period. If you or Shannow have a problem with the content, take it up with SOPUS. You're preaching to the choir with me.
 
Overkill,

I never once said T-6 did not meet spec. The OP could risk warranty because right or wrong, there's a paper floating around SOPUS that says different. If push comes to shove and after all this bickering has stopped, IF the OP did have a problem, lawyers cling to things like that SOPUS statement. The OP does not have the means to fight SOPUS or the vehicle manufacturer.

All of this over an oil the OP does not need and would be better off with a completely different oil.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Garak, Still trying to figure out yours and Shannow's problem. I never once said the OP can't or shouldn't use T6 only that T6 is NOT the best choice in his application. Period. How many times have I said that already.

You did say that he shouldn't use it - mentioning that it would jeopardize his warranty, and reading way too much into Shell's email.

Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
I did a cut/paste of an e-mail from SOPUS from another thread the last time this was brought up to provide a counter-point to the conversation. Period. If you or Shannow have a problem with the content, take it up with SOPUS. You're preaching to the choir with me.

That is my problem - the email - not you. I don't have to take it up with SOPUS. The people in Shell who are involved in formulating an oil and ensuring it meets specifications and in obtaining formal approvals know perfectly well that it's completely acceptable to use the product in a gasoline engine calling for an SN rated 5w-40. I fire off an email to this customer service person, they'll get flummoxed, and if they make it to an engineer, they'll get laughed at and it won't accomplish anything. I already went through the painful experience of trying to show them some issues in their Formula Shell data sheets, and the CSR was completely flummoxed, and didn't even understand the problem until walked through it line by line.

There's a reason I pay attention to the requirements behind specifications and approvals and to the actual specifications and approvals granted an oil. The people answering the phone or the emails at SOPUS, XOM, and so forth are likely to know very little, and if I must contact them about something, it's to get a very specific piece of technical data that they can either provide or claim proprietary.

Nonetheless, from a warranty standpoint, the email is irrelevant, regardless of lawyers seeing it or not. As I mentioned if someone with this vehicle calling for SM 5w-40 had a problem, he's using a completely approved lubricant. It is formally API SM. That is verified by testing. Certification can also be withdrawn, after a process, subsequent to failures. Certification cannot be withdrawn by a customer service representative writing an email to a member of the public.

If someone had a problem, as indicated above, and could prove to Hyundai's satisfaction they were using an SM rated 5w-40 (which Rotella most certainly is) as per manual directions, they would be in the clear. If something were actually wrong with the oil, as I mentioned before such as being out of spec, the customer wouldn't even be in that loop. If Hyundai were satisfied and convinced that Mr. Customer changed his oil from sealed jugs of Rotella 5w-40 SM, they'd be happy. If Shell had a bottling problem and it were filled with gear lube or transmission fluid or the oil was totally out of spec, Hyundai would come down on Shell and the customer likely would never even know about it.

When Shell puts that SM on that bottle of 5w-40, they are guaranteeing that it's perfectly acceptable to use in any vehicle calling for SM 5w-40. That's what the certification is for in the first place. SM is a gasoline engine specification, notably for vehicles with catalytic converters. It's not as stringent in that regard as GF-4 or GF-5, but the 40 grades are not so rated, and the manual allows 5w-40 SM.

What is this person's next email going to be - warning GM vehicles owners not to use Quaker State Ultimate Durability dexos1 5w30?

With respect to the appropriateness in general of this oil, we don't really know. Perhaps due to GDI, Hyundai decided to hang onto the 5w-40 SM option, if only to see what fares better over the long term, be it a 5w-40 SM, an SN/GF-5 oil, or an A5/B5 type oil. Or, someone forgot to change something when revising the manual.

Everyone's situation is also different with respect to cost. If it were me and I really wanted a synthetic, I could go the A5/B5 route (i.e. Mobil 1, Quaker State Ultimate Durability, or Syntec all in the neighborhood of $40 to over $50 per jug here, or over $70 for PU) or the Delvac 1 ESP 5w-40 route (at about $25 a jug). I'm sure SOPUS could get me a very nice deal on Rotella at their distributor. So, you can see why it's nice to have a little bit of choice depending upon where one lives.
 
Garak,

Still no problems with me. I get what you and Shannow are saying. I posted an official e-mail from SOPUS. Take it for what it's worth. The OP has heard from both sides so let him make is choice. What the OP puts in his oil pan will not change me life one iota. I'm not arguing a single word you or Shannow wrote.

T6 is unnecessarily heavy for the OP's application. The OP has not done the requisite testing to determine if a 40 grade oil is needed, he just thinks he needs it. If he wants a 40 grade oil, M1 is the better choice. If T6 is what he chooses, pour it in, no problems with me.
 
Well, see, that's the thing. We might thing Mobil 1 0w-40 is a better option. It may very well be. But, if we're being very picky about wording, 0w-40 doesn't meet the engine's specifications, whereas 5w-40 does. You and I both know that there's nothing generally wrong with a 0w-40 in a 5w-40 application. But, we know how automakers can be. As for unnecessarily heavy, I guess we'll have to see how these things dilute fuel. On the other hand, it may not be an issue whatsoever.

As for "offical e-mail," take it for what it's worth is right. The e-mail person obviously understands that an HDEO isn't normally kosher in an engine that calls for ILSAC rated oils. However, this specific case allows for that non-ILSAC rated oil.

An "official e-mail" telling me not to do something that falls perfectly within warranty and oil specification guidelines is about as useful as an "official e-mail" telling me I never have to change oil if I use Product X. In the Rotella case, the CSR is being silly.

Look at how Motorcraft yanked the gasoline rating from at least one of their HDEOs. I can understand that, within reason. Ford doesn't sell any gassers in North America calling for an SM 15w40. So, get rid of the irrelevant specification. Rotella, on the other hand, has a pretty good following among people in gassers.
 
Originally Posted By: Oil Changer
Overkill,

I never once said T-6 did not meet spec.


Then what is the issue?

Quote:
The OP could risk warranty because right or wrong, there's a paper floating around SOPUS that says different.

It doesn't matter what the paper says. What matters is that the car lists a 5w-40 SM lubricant in the manual as an acceptable choice and that's what T6 is. I believe Garak has tried to make that point a few times.

There are many other cars that have, over the years, spec'd what essentially is an HDEO for a gasser application. When the requirement is quite open-ended like that of Hyundai (versus something specific like BMW spec'ing LL-01 for example) then somebody is well within the requirements of their warranty to use any lubricant that satisfies them.

Quote:
If push comes to shove and after all this bickering has stopped, IF the OP did have a problem, lawyers cling to things like that SOPUS statement. The OP does not have the means to fight SOPUS or the vehicle manufacturer.

All of this over an oil the OP does not need and would be better off with a completely different oil.


There wouldn't be any fighting. If the OP had a problem, the manufacturer would look to see if he used a lubricant that met the requirements detailed in his owners manual and changed it at the specified interval. If both of those requirements were met, the manufacturer would take car of things. SOPUS would never be involved, it has nothing to do with SOPUS.

Now, if he was using a diesel-specific oil (as Garak also pointed out) that did NOT carry the SM designation, and there was an issue with the engine, then that provides an out for the manufacturer to say "hey, you didn't comply with the terms of your powertrain warranty, so you are out of pocket on this one, we aren't covering it."

The only role SOPUS has in this entire thing is the fact that they are providing the (SM approved) lubricant. Since that lubricant is suitable (as per the OM) for the application, nothing else here is SOPUS's problem.
 
Didn't mean to cause all this trouble with my post.

I appreciate everyone's help & suggestions. I think the people at SOPUS are trained to respond in a certain way, according to technical documents pertaining to the car in question.

Either way I'm sure T6 is a great oil and I may consider it in the future.

-Thanks
 
Well, that's what happens when manufacturers give us a bit of choice. Everybody is so concerned about liability that even the customer service people are afraid of using an oil for its intended purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom