Quote:
Bob (is the oil guy) makes a pretty good case and is a firm believer that oil filter choices should be driven by flow rather than filtration efficiency, as high efficiency filters like the Pure One are overkill and may restrict flow more than desirable under certain conditions.
As much as I really applauded the experiment, I had cause to find flaw with Bob's procedure after much personal research and pondering on the topic (and help from some of the resident engineers). The process involved applying 40 psi upstream of the filter and then measuring the pressure drop across it. Statically, this would appear to give you a clear picture of "relative resistance". The problem is, there was no bona fide way to determine if each filter was getting the same flow. If, however, he had applied some standard pressure
downstream ..let's say 30 lb and then read the upstream pressure, you would be assured that, assuming that the fluid was at the same temp, the flow to the "standard resistance of the engine" would be the same. 30 psi into a fixed restriction should be at a given flow, right? Then you would probably get a more realistic impression of what really goes on there. You would be able to determine if the pump was in relief and if your bypass threshold had been reached.
So, ..and again, as much as I applaud the experiment ..and will grant great tribute to how, with my critique of it, it was instrumental in forming the basis of my conclusions, I found a few holes in it.
Just keep three things in mind:
5 gpm is 5 gpm regardless of if it's through a 25' diameter pipe ..or a drinking straw.
Oil flow is, in most practical terms, irresistible as long as the oil pump is not in relief.
The engine is the biggest resistance to flow ..FAR OUT PACING the filter in relative resistance.
Those three givens will allow you to view the flow vs. filtration issue in a different way.