Who is using AI to analyze their UOAs?

Joined
Nov 5, 2009
Messages
11,175
Location
Virginia
Just plugged my all of my UOA data (22 since new) for my Sportwagen into CoPilot (could use Claude as well...that's what we are using at work for more technical tasks) and was suprised it the detail it gave me. Anyone else using it for this purpose?
 
Do you have another source to corroborate it's conclusions and do you agree with it?
Sure. I loaded the data raw out of my spreadsheet I keep not the actual reports from Blackstone. The commentary that AI provided was spot on with my own analysis, the analysis here on BITOG and the commentary from Blackstone. It was nothing Earth-shattering but it did follow the data well and had some reasonable solutions for some of the trends I see in my data. The best part was there weren't four pages of arguments er discussion...haha
 
Last edited:
That's an interesting idea. I never thought to use AI for that purpose; so far, I've primarily used it as a writing assistant. I use Copilot search engine as default b/c it pays me Amazon gift cards.
 
That's an interesting idea. I never thought to use AI for that purpose; so far, I've primarily used it as a writing assistant. I use Copilot search engine as default b/c it pays me Amazon gift cards.
To me this IS what AI is for... data analysis.
 
I treat artificial intelligence the same way I treat artificial sweeteners. Just because it tastes good doesn't mean it's good for you.

I don't like the way AI is used, especially not for something scientific. I have this worry that AI will get to a point of doing so much of our thinking for us that we lose our critical thinking capacity. I like the idea of AI for things like like real-time dynamic dialogue and actions in video games or for running mundane repetitive tasks. I don't want AI doing my thinking for me. Thus, I don't use AI to look at UOAs.

Also, the amount of times I've managed to box ChatGPT into a paradoxical corner with itself is rather amusing. I don't trust those programs to get anything right.
 
Sure. I loaded the data raw out of my spreadsheet I keep not the actual reports from Blackstone. The commentary that AI provided was spot on with my own analysis, the analysis here on BITOG and the commentary from Blackstone. It was nothing Earth-shattering but it did follow the data well and had some reasonable solutions for some of the trends I see in my data. The best part was there weren't four pages of arguments er discussion...haha
What was the AI training data?
 
I treat artificial intelligence the same way I treat artificial sweeteners. Just because it tastes good doesn't mean it's good for you.

I don't like the way AI is used, especially not for something scientific. I have this worry that AI will get to a point of doing so much of our thinking for us that we lose our critical thinking capacity. I like the idea of AI for things like like real-time dynamic dialogue and actions in video games or for running mundane repetitive tasks. I don't want AI doing my thinking for me. Thus, I don't use AI to look at UOAs.

Also, the amount of times I've managed to box ChatGPT into a paradoxical corner with itself is rather amusing. I don't trust those programs to get anything right.
Critical thinking is almost gone. Just look at all the doom-scrollers out there. AI, along with social media, will be the death of humanity.
 
On what basis?
My thought is that the database of results and known impact of low or high results would be more reliable than a human visceral read on the analysis. My suspicion is that even Blackstone comments were friendly and conversational, but hit or miss on utility.
 
What was the AI training data?
Probably this site :ROFLMAO:

It was a fun excersise that returned exactly what I thought the data showed me so clearly it's doing something right. If was BS, I would be feeding the entirety of the UOA database into Claude and seeing what it could find w/r to relationships etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom