What's the deal with Saab? are they building cars?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: Unearthed
http://www.insideline.com/saab/95/2011/2011-saab-9-5-first-look.html

Looks like they are getting back to production.


That article is over a month old. Since then they've halted all production and been unable to pay their suppliers.

Saab/Spyker is currently in talks with China's Great Wall Motor Company to try to get an investment so Saab can pay their suppliers and try to resume production.

If they can't strike a deal with Great Wall then it's probably all over for Saab.
 
it's a tough time to be an auto company. now a days, the name of the game is fuel efficiency. so they better start building some nice looking cars that get awesome gas mileage at an affordable price to get a look from customers. but, hey, that's just me.
smirk.gif
 
Last edited:
That's too bad.

I was looking forward to seeing if Spyker could re-Saabify Saab.

The Saabrolets and Saabarus are okay, but they are not Saabs.
 
I think most Saabs were sold in MN, WI, VT, and a couple to the Aspen Police in the 80s.

I owned 4, from an 85 Turbo to a 92 9000 Griffin (with rear ac!). They used to be great. Not so great since 1996 or so.
 
There are plenty of Saabs here in Colorado. I had a 9000 turbo 5mt that went over 300k miles before it was put out to pasture. It had it's quirks, but for the most part it was an enjoyable car to drive.

The other nice thing was the online presence of enthusiasts that offered assistance, which helped when replacing a blower motor and alternator brushes in mine. I recall the alternator going out, and looking at it thinking "oh [censored], how am I going to get it out?" A little research found that the brushes are easily replacable without removing the alternator. The blower motor was much more involved, but the step-by-step instructions with photographs were a huge help.
 
Sadly, SAAB is probably at death's door and somewhat deservedly so.

They are (were?) a niche player in a niche that is no longer large enough to support them. They have the infrastructure costs of a relatively large production car company, plus Swedish labor costs, but the market of a specialist...they are neither a Ford (volume) nor a Lotus (cost structure and a major player's backing). They never quite achieved the mainstream appeal of Volvo nor the premium appeal of Audi or BMW. GM certainly made some improvements to the existing line when they stared taking a stake in them, but never capitalized on their quirky appeal and let the brand flounder. By a few years ago, their cars were dated and the Subaru and GM badge engineered models were truly uninspiring...I had a 9-7X, an awd "SAAB" SUV that was just not good in snow. We loved our convertible and our new 9-3x awd sedan is a great car for the price, a significant improvement over the previous version, but the new cars are probably too late to save them. The new 9-5 is beautiful but drives just OK, it seems to feel larger than it is, and is expensive and barely competitive for its class.

Sad to see them go, and I'd buy another, but I am not too optimistic.
 
Its a niche company. Unfortunately they were not hitting a niche that anyone wanted to buy nor adapting. Being small means you can change.

Niche company's can do well, case in point Subaru. They had terrible sales in the early 1990's.

A few smart/lucky decisions

  • AWD only
  • Subaru Outback
  • WRX in US
  • Mainstreaming Outback & Forester


They managed to have largest sales ever during recent deep auto recession

Subaru is so small they can change a model facade/aspects very quickly. Good example is redesigned WRX, from 2008 to 2011 it has morphed from a quick boring looking Corolla with soft handling to fast car(0-60 4.7 secs) with appealing looks with handling for same exact price.

Saab instead of adapting simply put their head in the sand and blames the rescission.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom