give reasons also please, thanx
I still question that flow rating. I don't think that particular filter was flowing well because of it's media, but I feel it was in bypass or it was leaking unfiltered oil past it's media. The media in Toughguard and Duraguard Fram is supposed to be very similar, yet look how poorly the Toughguard did. I bet if Bob tried a second Fram it would not match that 4psi drop (unless it too was in total bypass)quote:
Originally posted by kctom:
Why not use a Fram? It protects better than the M1 and flows better than the K&N. You will find that info right here on this Website.
Tom
quote:
Originally posted by Patman:
Originally posted by kctom:
[qb] I just don't trust Fram's inferior quality materials, when so many other filters are the same or less $$$ but with better construction. Supertechs at $2 are the filter of choice if you want a low cost filter. If you have the $$$, go with K&N, IMHO.I'm with Patman here.![]()
Thats about you can say: "they are not "too bad". For years they enjoyed a good reputation because of good advertising and endorsements. As time went by other companies decided to get a piece of the pie. They turned out better filters with advanced media. Fram as part of a troubled company was slow to react and merely lived on its laurels. Any time you saw a comparison of cutaway filters in auto stores with say purolator comparing itself to the national brand-that national brand was Fram. You could see a clear difference (Fram=inferior). Fram has moved in the direction of improving their product (because they had too) They have come out with the X2 line that is on a par with other manufactures (at a higher price) They were the last to advertise micron ratings (gee-I wonder why). Of course they were the ones using the cardboard end caps.quote:
Originally posted by kctom:
I have had 750K miles with Fram and 33 years. They can't be too bad.
Tom