Quote:
I see a lot of people asking the intended use for this "best value" vehicle. Honestly, I think this question is based answered without knowing how or where the vehicle will be used.
To me, best value means the most amount of engineering and best quality of materials that go into a vehicle for a given price.
A couple years ago, bogatyr, who used to come to this site, and I were at a car show and he was wowing at a Jeep Rubicon. I looked at the sticker, balked at the $25,000 price and said: "Wow, why so much?"
bogatyr, who fancies 4WD vehicles, informed me that the Rubicon was the "Big Dog" and had 'Detroit Locker' diffs.
I said yeah, but is that worth several thousand dollars more than an identical-looking Jeep Wrangler? What kind of technology, metallurgy or labor goes into the production of a Detroit Locker? Once you tool up for large automotive components, you'd be surprising how cheap they are.
It seemed to me that the Rubicons were significantly overpriced for what you got. Of course, they weren't the only ones. Another example that comes to mind was the Toyota Celica of the mid 90s. One version was several thousand dollars more expensive than a very comparable Acura Integra. Again, seems to me the Celica was a poor value ... or maybe the Acura a terrific one?
If you know a lot about muscle cars, it is maddening to find out how significant improvements could have been made to vehicles (engine, transmission, suspension, body structure, etc ...) for just a few dollars more per vehicle: Increased nickel content in the engine blocks, 4-bolt main bearings, better heads and exhaust manifolds, etc ...
Cars that incorporated many of these little improvements for the same or a similar price should be considered a "good value" ... regardless of how they are used and whether or not any given purchaser appreciates it at the time.