Their website says the speeds up and down are symmetrical. No data caps.For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
Last edited:
Their website says the speeds up and down are symmetrical. No data caps.For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
Gaming can use a lot of bandwidth. Between downloading huge amounts of data for installation and updates and online multiplayer gaming constantly using bandwidth, gaming can use more bandwidth than 4K TV.28Mbs which seems perfectly adequate for web browsing and HDTV streaming. Other than a large multiple user household or
4K TV why do people need a connection 10 or 20 times faster.
For the most part, uploading is used much less (10x to 20x) than downloading. So in most situations, having symmetric up/downloads is more hype than anything. I manage the network for a small business on a symmetric plan and even with a lot of VPN activity (which is heavy on uploading in their environment), their upload usage is only 15% of their total bandwidth usage. For my home usage, which consists of streaming, gaming, work and general browsing, only 5% of the total used bandwidth is going towards uploading.For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
I wish i had access to a plan like that. Instead i have to pay out the nose just to get a measly 40mbps upload on cable internet.My ISP provider is XMission. XMission uses the Utopia fiber optic network.
These speeds have been more than sufficient for my wife and I. We stream all of our TV. I often watch YouTube, while my wife is streaming TV at the same time. No problems.
View attachment 254575
You’re really at the bottom of the barrel in bandwith. Barely enough for one device and one device only on your network to stream 4K
Many homes have 10 to 30 devices using the home network but of course don’t use the bandwidth of 4K streaming. It still can add up more do with more than 2 person in the home
I do agree anything above 300/300 Mbps in overkill is most all homes.
Still at 28 MBPS you are only going to be able to stream 1 4K TV with no other devices in the home using the connection. If you do you may think you are watching a 4K movie but the video is dumbed down to what your bandwith can handle in order to have smooth streaming
https://www.uswitch.com/broadband/guides/broadband-for-streaming/
I get that there are ways to connect at those speeds. But then the testing is going to be at a computer or tablet. Obviously through an application or web page. I suppose it would be possible to have some sort of speed test built in to a gateway. Maybe built into the configuration interface? I'm pretty sure the only ways to get those kinds of speeds (for now) are copper wires of some kind, or maybe even optical networking.
From memory there were a ton of different configurations of Uverse in our area. All of them were fiber to the node, and none of them amounted to much more than an 'upgraded' ADSL. Although, if memory serves, they did offer us IP TV and not DirectTV so they must have somehow had the bandwidth for it. Not sure, it has been some time since we cancelled it.
My original install had a giant outdoor 'modem' and a smaller router inside. (Or whatever their names for them were). This was over 2 twisted pairs from the DSLAM. I think we were at 18/3 then, or 12/3, can't remember.
Later they did a speed upgrade (to 25 down!!!) and did away with the outside box. This required a card upgrade in the DSLAM which took some massive hoop jumping on my part to get them to do. Still over the twisted pairs. We had something like 6mb outbound and 25 inbound with it....on a good day.
Agree, barely any bandwithHow much would something like VoIP or all these little IoT devices use up anyways? I would imagine all these little smart sensor devices would barely use up any bandwidth. Kind of like how dozens of wall warts in a home isn't going to be close to using as much power as a toaster oven.
Still - a lot of ISPs are advertising their services as a way for several people in the same home to play games or stream simultaneously. AT&T might have the most annoying ads in that regard.
Agree, barely any bandwith
That's crazy I have Spectrum, getting 400mps but paying over $70Charter / Spectrum 300mbps download, 15mbps upload $49/month. More than fast enough for us. Good service too.
That's a great price. Our cable provider, Cox, charges $120 a month for cable 1gig download with 100Mbps upload speeds and a 1.25TB per month data limit. The new guy in town, IdeaTek, will be charging $90/mo for 1gig up/down fiber with unlimited bandwidth. I'm on their waiting list to sign up as soon as they go live.Brightspeed fiber 1gig up and down, $49 a month.
That's a great price. Our cable provider, Cox, charges $120 a month for cable 1gig download with 100Mbps upload speeds and a 1.25TB per month data limit. The new guy in town, IdeaTek, will be charging $90/mo for 1gig up/down fiber with unlimited bandwidth. I'm on their waiting list to sign up as soon as they go live.
Around here Sonic Internet charges a flat price $50 regardless of whether it's theoretical 1 or 10 gbit/sec symmetric. No rental cost for base equipment. No installation fees. No contracts. They don't have ESPN3 which would be nice but obviously that's a cost to the ISP. The only discounts might be one or two months free - often if responding to an installer knocking on doors.
This is from the company itself, so take it with a grain of salt, but whoa! There are others with similar results, but there's one where I can't link a photo.