What is your Internet provider and speed?

For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
Their website says the speeds up and down are symmetrical. No data caps.
 
Last edited:
My ISP provider is XMission. XMission uses the Utopia fiber optic network.

These speeds have been more than sufficient for my wife and I. We stream all of our TV. I often watch YouTube, while my wife is streaming TV at the same time. No problems.

1734459311482.webp
 
1000002138.webp

Bluepeak fiber 1G/1G for $55/mo. The test was done over WiFi. Overkill for my needs but this is the lowest speed I can get...I'm surprised some of you with fiber are sub 500/500...seems low for fiber but I guess my assumption was wrong that all fiber packages killed the lower cable provider speeds.
 
28Mbs which seems perfectly adequate for web browsing and HDTV streaming. Other than a large multiple user household or
4K TV why do people need a connection 10 or 20 times faster.
Gaming can use a lot of bandwidth. Between downloading huge amounts of data for installation and updates and online multiplayer gaming constantly using bandwidth, gaming can use more bandwidth than 4K TV.

My firewall has a live bandwidth graph so I can see how much data rate I'm using when streaming various channels. I pretty much agree with the numbers in this article:
https://tachus.com/streaming-tv-data-usage/

For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
For the most part, uploading is used much less (10x to 20x) than downloading. So in most situations, having symmetric up/downloads is more hype than anything. I manage the network for a small business on a symmetric plan and even with a lot of VPN activity (which is heavy on uploading in their environment), their upload usage is only 15% of their total bandwidth usage. For my home usage, which consists of streaming, gaming, work and general browsing, only 5% of the total used bandwidth is going towards uploading.

This is why most ISPs offered plans with 10x more download speed than upload. With the advent if fiber, symmetric became a new selling point because it seems like you're getting way more than your cable or DSL provider offered. But it mostly sits idle because heavy uploading is such an uncommon occurrence.
 
My ISP provider is XMission. XMission uses the Utopia fiber optic network.

These speeds have been more than sufficient for my wife and I. We stream all of our TV. I often watch YouTube, while my wife is streaming TV at the same time. No problems.

View attachment 254575
I wish i had access to a plan like that. Instead i have to pay out the nose just to get a measly 40mbps upload on cable internet.
 
You’re really at the bottom of the barrel in bandwith. Barely enough for one device and one device only on your network to stream 4K
Many homes have 10 to 30 devices using the home network but of course don’t use the bandwidth of 4K streaming. It still can add up more do with more than 2 person in the home
I do agree anything above 300/300 Mbps in overkill is most all homes.

Still at 28 MBPS you are only going to be able to stream 1 4K TV with no other devices in the home using the connection. If you do you may think you are watching a 4K movie but the video is dumbed down to what your bandwith can handle in order to have smooth streaming

https://www.uswitch.com/broadband/guides/broadband-for-streaming/

How much would something like VoIP or all these little IoT devices use up anyways? I would imagine all these little smart sensor devices would barely use up any bandwidth. Kind of like how dozens of wall warts in a home isn't going to be close to using as much power as a toaster oven.

Still - a lot of ISPs are advertising their services as a way for several people in the same home to play games or stream simultaneously. AT&T might have the most annoying ads in that regard.
 
I get that there are ways to connect at those speeds. But then the testing is going to be at a computer or tablet. Obviously through an application or web page. I suppose it would be possible to have some sort of speed test built in to a gateway. Maybe built into the configuration interface? I'm pretty sure the only ways to get those kinds of speeds (for now) are copper wires of some kind, or maybe even optical networking.

Found that a connection to speedtest.net is built in to a new gateway that I bought. So I suppose something that could connect at 2.5 or 10 gbit/sec could accurately measure that speed.
 
From memory there were a ton of different configurations of Uverse in our area. All of them were fiber to the node, and none of them amounted to much more than an 'upgraded' ADSL. Although, if memory serves, they did offer us IP TV and not DirectTV so they must have somehow had the bandwidth for it. Not sure, it has been some time since we cancelled it.

My original install had a giant outdoor 'modem' and a smaller router inside. (Or whatever their names for them were). This was over 2 twisted pairs from the DSLAM. I think we were at 18/3 then, or 12/3, can't remember.

Later they did a speed upgrade (to 25 down!!!) and did away with the outside box. This required a card upgrade in the DSLAM which took some massive hoop jumping on my part to get them to do. Still over the twisted pairs. We had something like 6mb outbound and 25 inbound with it....on a good day.

When my parents got U-Verse I recall they just connected it to the existing phone line and there was an all-in one box connected indoors, including Wi-Fi, maybe a couple of ethernet ports, and VoIP. Their POTS line had already been cancelled/disconnected (previous ADSL disconnected as a result) when they ordered VoIP so there was no contention. I don't even think they needed a filter any more. The previous service provider sent maybe 4 2WIRE filters. Most were little cables and a dongle, but one was for a wall-mounted phone. And it's bizarre that AT&T is still selling them. Who still has a wall phone? Or DSL?

https://www.att.com/buy/accessories/Internet-Equipment/2wire-wall-mount-dsl-filter.html

2wire-wall-mount-dsl-filter-black.png
 
How much would something like VoIP or all these little IoT devices use up anyways? I would imagine all these little smart sensor devices would barely use up any bandwidth. Kind of like how dozens of wall warts in a home isn't going to be close to using as much power as a toaster oven.

Still - a lot of ISPs are advertising their services as a way for several people in the same home to play games or stream simultaneously. AT&T might have the most annoying ads in that regard.
Agree, barely any bandwith
 
xfinity gigabit plan. their modem in bridge mode connected via 2.5GBE link to Ubiquiti UDM SE.
bonus shot of Iphone 15 Pro Max connected to a U7 Pro (only have a gigabit link from switch to AP)

ATT Fiber is being pulled into the area and i will jump ship from xfinity as fast as i can. i cannot stand slow uploads and ping spikes that come along with COAX based internet.

IMG_9743.webp


IMG_9742.webp
 
Starlink Gen 3 bridged and connected to a Ubiquiti UCG Ultra.

this is in service at the lakehouse after hughes net took 2 weeks to get service back up for our neighborhood following berryl. i use a U7 Outdoor to radiate the cul-de-sac and have u6 meshes in our neighbors houses that choose to split the cost of star link with me. 90x faster than hughesnet and i’m saving everyone a ton of money.

IMG_9744.webp
 
ATT gigabit fiber bridged to a Ubiquiti UCG Ultra at my parents house. their old modem/router doesn’t have a 2.5GBE port on it so it is limited to GBE speeds and the overhead that comes with it. have to love virtually zero ping and symmetrical speeds.

I will be rolling out a UCG Max at my grandparents house with some U7 pros that also have ATT gigabit fiber. hopefully their modem/router has a 2.5GBE link.

IMG_9745.webp
 
Brightspeed fiber 1gig up and down, $49 a month.
That's a great price. Our cable provider, Cox, charges $120 a month for cable 1gig download with 100Mbps upload speeds and a 1.25TB per month data limit. The new guy in town, IdeaTek, will be charging $90/mo for 1gig up/down fiber with unlimited bandwidth. I'm on their waiting list to sign up as soon as they go live.
 
That's a great price. Our cable provider, Cox, charges $120 a month for cable 1gig download with 100Mbps upload speeds and a 1.25TB per month data limit. The new guy in town, IdeaTek, will be charging $90/mo for 1gig up/down fiber with unlimited bandwidth. I'm on their waiting list to sign up as soon as they go live.

Around here Sonic Internet charges a flat price $50 regardless of whether it's theoretical 1 or 10 gbit/sec symmetric. No rental cost for base equipment. No installation fees. No contracts. They don't have ESPN3 which would be nice but obviously that's a cost to the ISP. The only discounts might be one or two months free - often if responding to an installer knocking on doors.

This is from the company itself, so take it with a grain of salt, but whoa! There are others with similar results, but there's one where I can't link a photo.

 
Around here Sonic Internet charges a flat price $50 regardless of whether it's theoretical 1 or 10 gbit/sec symmetric. No rental cost for base equipment. No installation fees. No contracts. They don't have ESPN3 which would be nice but obviously that's a cost to the ISP. The only discounts might be one or two months free - often if responding to an installer knocking on doors.

This is from the company itself, so take it with a grain of salt, but whoa! There are others with similar results, but there's one where I can't link a photo.


Nice! Bell used to offer 8Gbit symmetrical but pulled the package.
 
Back
Top Bottom