What is your Internet provider and speed?

2.5Gbps ports are becoming increasingly popular on routers and mesh systems. I have a 2.5Gbps WAN port on my TP-Link, granted the LAN is all gigabit still. I didn’t spend much either.

I get that there are ways to connect at those speeds. But then the testing is going to be at a computer or tablet. Obviously through an application or web page. I suppose it would be possible to have some sort of speed test built in to a gateway. Maybe built into the configuration interface? I'm pretty sure the only ways to get those kinds of speeds (for now) are copper wires of some kind, or maybe even optical networking.

And it's weird because it's increasingly harder to find computers with wired ethernet. I think my 2012 MacBook Pro is the last notebook computer Apple ever made with built-in wired ethernet. I'm sure there are desktops and high performance workstations operating off of faster networking. But whn an installer came in with his company issue laptop, he needed an ethernet to USB-C adapter.
 
I just helped my parents with Sonic Internet service. $50/month unlimited, unlike Comcast that caps at 1.2 GB/month before they charge $10 per 100 GB over that. But I tested it on a 1G wired connection to my notebook computer and I'm seeing 900+ down and up. And the installer said it's capable of just under 10 gbps with the right equipment. But connected by Wi-Fi to older equipment (running encryption), the speed tests drop precipitously - maybe 180 gps down and 140 up. But I ordered a new Wi-Fi 6 box for them and need to pick it up today from an Amazon locker. Hopefully that should be pretty fast. But the ping time is like 2 ms when with Comcast it was maybe 14 ms.

Not sure what to do with the excess fiber optic cable though. The installer said we could do whatever we wanted with it.

This was the test speed with my computer connected straight into the OTN box.

speedtest-webp.254419


Not sure what's the deal with 1.3% loss because it's not reporting any loss connected via a Wi-Fi box. Maybe that's something that happens when it's connected directly.
 
You asked for people's speeds but only posted half of yours.
what is your upload? AFAIK xfinity isnt synchronous

I heard that by fall 2026 they are rolling out synchronous speeds to my area ie 1gb down/ 1gb up etc.


My "1 GIG" spectrum seems to cap out at around 900 down 40up, although on a good day I've gotten 1100 down.
the "rated" speed is "upto" 1000 down 35 up
only $88.99 a month o_O almost time to make a move.
We have a municipal fiber ring coming fiber is already in the ground. But the 130 mile ring isnt completed yet..


"Today was a good day"

View attachment 254376
I don't worry about upload speed.
 
Went to Xfinity store today and they would have kept me at the same rate for a two year lock.
I decided to switch to Metronet 1 gig which will be about 68.00 a month total. Also getting free installation, one month free, free router and a 100.00 Visa gift card.
 
Went to Xfinity store today and they would have kept me at the same rate for a two year lock.
I decided to switch to Metronet 1 gig which will be about 68.00 a month total. Also getting free installation, one month free, free router and a 100.00 Visa gift card.
For all that you dont care about it... your new upload should be aprox 30 to 50x faster with the synchronous fiber.
 
You asked for people's speeds but only posted half of yours.
what is your upload? AFAIK xfinity isnt synchronous

I heard that by fall 2026 they are rolling out synchronous speeds to my area ie 1gb down/ 1gb up etc.

Started thinking about it for a while, but I'm thinking that's not the right term. Now I recall it's "symmetric" vs "asymmetric".

I worked in a small office once where we had Comcast Business. It was supposedly 25 mbit/sec (down or up), but we didn't really need anything more than that. But it almost always tested faster than that.

The first "broadband" internet I ordered was supposedly up to 1.5 mbit/sec down and 128 kbit/sec up ADSL. I'm pretty sure it was useless for modern teleconferencing (especially the upstream), but back in 2002 it was awesome when maybe half of home internet was still via dial-up.
 
How much bandwidth do you really need to browse BITOG? :)

About 400/30 Mbps here and not paying extra for Gigabit. Point of diminishing return, no doubt.
Latency certain internet uses like porting into a network require either a TON of upload bandwidth or very low latency.

Modern web has mediocre latency under all circumstances and I’ve found if upload speed drops near or below 10mbs the connection becomes so unstable as to become unusable.

Sad but true, never thought I would see the day that a meg/sec wasn’t good enough
 
Latency certain internet uses like porting into a network require either a TON of upload bandwidth or very low latency.

Modern web has mediocre latency under all circumstances and I’ve found if upload speed drops near or below 10mbs the connection becomes so unstable as to become unusable.

Sad but true, never thought I would see the day that a meg/sec wasn’t good enough

I manage a public-facing WiFi network with a 20/5 mbps client QoS profile and the general browsing experience is identical to anything else I’ve experienced. Sure, you start uploading/downloading files, for example, and you’ll likely notice.
 
At this very moment 112 up/110 down. My mileage does vary widely. Wireless connection provided by Horry Telephone Cooperative.
 
Just curious how people are getting over 1 gbit/sec tested. I looked at the price of Wi-Fi boxes with even 2.5 gbit/sec inputs and they're really pricey. I'm not even sure what computers, tablets, and phones can handle that speed. I suppose it could make a difference if there are lots of users.
Lots of providers are issuing equipment with Wi-Fi 6E and even 7, and fiber ISPs are doing routers with 10G ports to go along with the 6GHz wifi. At ISP scale, the cost is not too bad... nor are the results over wi-fi :-) This was taken in my lab environment at work off of a Wi-Fi 6E router connected to an ONT provisioned at 8Gbps:

Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 21.45.57.webp
 
Fastest speed I can get in my neighborhood made in 07 is 20mbps with att. But the homes in a nearby neighborhood made 2 years later can enjoy up to 1000mb with att fiber since it appears our homes were fitted with the last of the old stuff and theirs were fitted with the first of the new stuff. What's annoying is that 20mb for me is the same price as 100mb for them. But 20mb is surprisingly not bad even though it sounds terrible in day to day usage.

Exact same boat we're in. Anything new built in the county is fiber. AT&T is still DSL to us, but...I guess 'lucky' for us, Comcast came and ran cable in the neighborhood. We only pay for the 100mb service and we get about 80 usually.

Its enough for the 3 of us, we all stream, we have about 20 devices on the network.....it works. Back in the day I'd have paid for faster, but we just don't need it.

I always try to buy my equipment outright and everything that can be wired with real cable reasonably is.

1734407673151.webp
 
Exact same boat we're in. Anything new built in the county is fiber. AT&T is still DSL to us, but...

Just traditional ADSL over prexisting phone lines? Or was it the original U-Verse?

I recall U-Verse was fiber to the neighborhood, and then there were these big ugly boxes that had short run DSL lines to the customer. I think they could guarantee reasonably high speeds (maybe a max 24 mbit/sec) as long as the line was short. But it was a kludge since cable was typically faster. I remember when SBC (and its subsidiaries like Pacific Bell) had commercials for its DSL service claiming that cable internet bogged down because of too many users sharing cable in the same neighborhood, but I never saw that when I visited someone with cable internet.

What did they call it?

Fiber to the node. Like U-Verse.
Fiber to the curb. But still using DSL technology rather than a transmission line or twisted-pair.
Fiber to the home. Basically what people can get these days.
Fiber to the desk. That would be interesting. Although most home users use Wi-Fi at home, maybe there's a future with homes with fiber instead of ethernet cables in walls.
 
PTD via cable company.
The tier I pay for is supposed to be 500 mbps down and 50 mbps up. I use a VPN on everything.
What I get through VPN is 48 down and 50 up. If I disconnect from the VPN, I can get 300 down and 50 up. I don't normally do that. That's on a wired all in one. The VPN enabled download speed is adequate for us. Different VPN servers don't make any meaningful difference. Includes wireless TV streaming downstairs from router and also Wi-Fi phones use.
 
Just traditional ADSL over prexisting phone lines? Or was it the original U-Verse?

I recall U-Verse was fiber to the neighborhood, and then there were these big ugly boxes that had short run DSL lines to the customer. I think they could guarantee reasonably high speeds (maybe a max 24 mbit/sec) as long as the line was short. But it was a kludge since cable was typically faster. I remember when SBC (and its subsidiaries like Pacific Bell) had commercials for its DSL service claiming that cable internet bogged down because of too many users sharing cable in the same neighborhood, but I never saw that when I visited someone with cable internet.

What did they call it?

Fiber to the node. Like U-Verse.
Fiber to the curb. But still using DSL technology rather than a transmission line or twisted-pair.
Fiber to the home. Basically what people can get these days.
Fiber to the desk. That would be interesting. Although most home users use Wi-Fi at home, maybe there's a future with homes with fiber instead of ethernet cables in walls.

From memory there were a ton of different configurations of Uverse in our area. All of them were fiber to the node, and none of them amounted to much more than an 'upgraded' ADSL. Although, if memory serves, they did offer us IP TV and not DirectTV so they must have somehow had the bandwidth for it. Not sure, it has been some time since we cancelled it.

My original install had a giant outdoor 'modem' and a smaller router inside. (Or whatever their names for them were). This was over 2 twisted pairs from the DSLAM. I think we were at 18/3 then, or 12/3, can't remember.

Later they did a speed upgrade (to 25 down!!!) and did away with the outside box. This required a card upgrade in the DSLAM which took some massive hoop jumping on my part to get them to do. Still over the twisted pairs. We had something like 6mb outbound and 25 inbound with it....on a good day.

Either way, it was crap. It was crap when it started and it was crap when I cancelled it. Every time it rained our speeds would drop or we'd get knocked offline, if you saturated outbound speeds (3mb at the time!!!) it would completely hose inbound. The neighborhood was built in 2007, so its not like it was some crusty old development with crap lines, they were all fairly new.

For all of the horror stories with Comcast, they have been pretty much rock solid for us. The biggest outage was about a day when a big storm came through and absolutely obliterated one of their hubs(switch?, didn't get a good look at it when they had it open) just down from my house. The poor guy worked on that thing for something like 6 hours to get it back up and going. He said it was one of the worst lightning cleanups he'd ever done and that it must have taken a direct hit. *shrug* Still not bad for all the stories you hear.

--Edit--

Sent me down the internet equipment rabbit hole.

The outdoor unit was a 2wire I3812V

Just as I remembered. Bonded pair technology.......for the suck.

s-l1600.webp
 
Last edited:
300/300 local fiber provider (Focus) $58 a month actual payment.

Through 2 walls and 25 feet from router on my iPhone

With Apple private relay on:

IMG_2180.webp


With Apple private relay off:

IMG_2181.webp


I was surprised Apple relay didn’t hinder performance, I don’t feel that is always the case but haven’t checked in a while.

Upload speed is important to me and so glad to have fiber in our new community (300/300) vs costly spectrum with snails pace (300/12) Mbps upload in our last community.

Interestingly I did a 3rd measurement 4 feet from router (apple private relay on) and there was no difference in speed.
IMG_2182.webp
 
Last edited:
28Mbs which seems perfectly adequate for web browsing and HDTV streaming. Other than a large multiple user household or
4K TV why do people need a connection 10 or 20 times faster.
 
28Mbs which seems perfectly adequate for web browsing and HDTV streaming. Other than a large multiple user household or
4K TV why do people need a connection 10 or 20 times faster.
You’re really at the bottom of the barrel in bandwith. Barely enough for one device and one device only on your network to stream 4K
Many homes have 10 to 30 devices using the home network but of course don’t use the bandwidth of 4K streaming. It still can add up more do with more than 2 person in the home
I do agree anything above 300/300 Mbps in overkill is most all homes.

Still at 28 MBPS you are only going to be able to stream 1 4K TV with no other devices in the home using the connection. If you do you may think you are watching a 4K movie but the video is dumbed down to what your bandwith can handle in order to have smooth streaming

https://www.uswitch.com/broadband/guides/broadband-for-streaming/
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom