What are you working on today?

2015 Dodge Grand Caravan 3.6 V6
Replaced oil cooler and changed oil

1990 Chevrolet Cheyenne 1500 4.3 V6
Replaced radiator, changed oil
 
Changed the dash bulbs in my daughter's WJ. Wow! If only all cars where that easy!

IMG_20240223_175113131.jpg
 
'02 Subaru Forester: new evap vent valve, new IAT sensor, oil change, new RF CV axle, and some non-foulers for those, um...ya know....fouled spark plugs.

I honestly don't know how this made it 414k miles, but it's still here. There are leaks on the engine but it never left a drop on my shop floor in two days. It's allegedly on the original engine, but I'm very skeptical of that claim.
20240223_225434.jpg

Yeah, there'll be no re-booting that joint:
20240223_210745.jpg


Then in prep for tomorrow I took a look at this Precision fuel pump I bought for an '88 XJ. I really just wanted the sending unit, and the Precision pump itself had epically bad reviews on O'Reilly's site (side note: I give O'Reilly credit for seemingly not censoring negative reviews) which was easy for me to believe because I had a Precision lift pump on a CTD die a very early death. In that case the reviews were terrible, too.

In the spirit of trust-but-verify, I ohm'd the sending unit and it was ALL OVER THE MAP. I knew it should be 0 to 88 but it'd flutter into the hundreds (sometimes 400+ ohms) while moving the arm, and even if you held it steady to simulate a fixed fuel level but gently pushed/pulled it'd go insane.
20240223_233210.jpg


I took my pocket knife and pre-loaded the contact more and it now reads a steady 1.5 to 93 ohms (which should be just fine for 0 to 88) regardless of lateral movement, and no longer jumps while lowering or raising the arm. Lower left of photo is precision sending unit adjustment tool, aka pocket knife blade:
20240223_233227.jpg


Just the same, it left a really bad taste in my mouth and I'm not confident in the sending unit even if I could transfer the known, working pump to it (I never intended to run the Precision pump). If anyone had blindly installed this they'd have an inop/inconsistent/unreliable fuel reading.

So I'm gonna tell the guy I'll have to order quality parts and fix it after my upcoming vacation. O'Reilly can take this pump and shove it, as the song goes.
 
'02 Subaru Forester: new evap vent valve, new IAT sensor, oil change, new RF CV axle, and some non-foulers for those, um...ya know....fouled spark plugs.

I honestly don't know how this made it 414k miles, but it's still here. There are leaks on the engine but it never left a drop on my shop floor in two days. It's allegedly on the original engine, but I'm very skeptical of that claim. View attachment 205092
Yeah, there'll be no re-booting that joint:
View attachment 205093

Then in prep for tomorrow I took a look at this Precision fuel pump I bought for an '88 XJ. I really just wanted the sending unit, and the Precision pump itself had epically bad reviews on O'Reilly's site (side note: I give O'Reilly credit for seemingly not censoring negative reviews) which was easy for me to believe because I had a Precision lift pump on a CTD die a very early death. In that case the reviews were terrible, too.

In the spirit of trust-but-verify, I ohm'd the sending unit and it was ALL OVER THE MAP. I knew it should be 0 to 88 but it'd flutter into the hundreds (sometimes 400+ ohms) while moving the arm, and even if you held it steady to simulate a fixed fuel level but gently pushed/pulled it'd go insane. View attachment 205094

I took my pocket knife and pre-loaded the contact more and it now reads a steady 1.5 to 93 ohms (which should be just fine for 0 to 88) regardless of lateral movement, and no longer jumps while lowering or raising the arm. Lower left of photo is precision sending unit adjustment tool, aka pocket knife blade:View attachment 205095

Just the same, it left a really bad taste in my mouth and I'm not confident in the sending unit even if I could transfer the known, working pump to it (I never intended to run the Precision pump). If anyone had blindly installed this they'd have an inop/inconsistent/unreliable fuel reading.

So I'm gonna tell the guy I'll have to order quality parts and fix it after my upcoming vacation. O'Reilly can take this pump and shove it, as the song goes.
I typically use Delphi pumps/sending units from auto zone or napa. So far so good.
 
I typically use Delphi pumps/sending units from auto zone or napa. So far so good.
Thanks! I tried to get one from AutoZone but the nearest store with stock was 1.5 hours away.

Reading reviews on Amazon, the Delphi sure doesn't sound much better. Talk of premature pump failure and a couple reviewers mention broken welds, but who knows if that was from rushed or careless installation. Another says the pump is incredibly loud and another says he had to modify the mounting tab to get it to fit.

If anyone REALLY cares the reviews are here, but I understand very few people are shopping for a fuel pump assy for a Renix XJ these days:

ANYWAY, I'm looking at the US Motor Works USEP7091S. It's consistently the most expensive in cyberland and the company goes to great lengths to talk about all the quality materials they use. Maybe just lip service, though. It at least looks different than the others with a gold mounting plate rather than silver for all the others. Maybe it doesn't come from the same factory as all the other Chinese junk.

I don't have any experience with this company, however.
 
1989 Chevy C-70 with either a 454 or 366(we have a discrepancy)

Never heard of a production tall deck 454 Mark IV, 366 & 427 only. If it has dual thermostats...It's a tall deck intake & has either a 366 or 427 as tall deck intakes don't fit standard deck Mark IV without milling & a distributor spacer.

Tall deck big blocks employ an extra piston ring.
 
Upgraded my Fit from the spec’ed 151R ATV battery to 51R Civic battery.

I’ll need to put in new positive terminal clam and housing as the OEM is too big and won’t sit properly onto the terminal post. I secured it down and bought new harness bolt to secure the battery; one bolt is too short once the existing battery tray was cut down.

Possible future upgrade: Get a 2009 or earlier or Euro/Asia Jazz battery tray as Jazz comes standard with 51R.

Very proud of myself. 151R is a smallest automotive battery and only slightly bigger than scooter and ATV battery. It maybe the same size as small SxS battery as the bigger SxS use either single or dual 51R, 24 or 24F, or 35.

This battery upgrade will help in subzero morning start as well as not worrying about running down the battery when sitting waiting for family at grocery store while charging thr phone.

And it should provide a lot of comfort knowing 51R is available at all automotive stores, Walmart, Costco, BJ, Battery Plus, and even gas stations and repair garages whereas 151R is being discontinued by most battery makers and the one or two that still make them do so via store brands over $250 whereas Costco charges $120.
 
Last edited:
Upgraded my Fit from the spec’ed 151R ATV battery to 51R Civic battery.
Holy cannoli is that a tiny battery. What year Fit? I forgot about them cars… they must’ve stopped making them years back?

My Can-Am has a battery that’s bigger (CCA) than what I saw some 151Rs were (370). Good upgrade you did.

1708824483132.jpeg
 
Was supposed to be a quick oil change on the Mad Max SJ Forester. At the moment the 16" steelies with snows combined with the bumper I built turn the Mad Max dial to 11. Still, it's a good commuter for the girl who drives it, passing through 120 miles of rural deer country 5 days/week
20240224_165723.jpg

While on the lift I found the right rear making light grinding noises, so I went to pull the wheel only to find what makes a Subaru a Subaru: an inexplicably seized lugnut. It stalled my mid-torque but the 2767 sheared it.
20240224_175320.jpg

Fortunately I still stock Subaru lug studs and nuts so it was back in service relatively quickly. And yeah, the noise was nothing -- just mud and dust from the spring mud season.
20240224_175819.jpg
 
While I detest Ford and pretty much everything about them, I will give credit where its due. The 1999 F250 Superduty 5.4 was having some no crank situations. Battery was good, cleaned connections, shift linkage tight so its either the solenoid, starter or neutral safety switch. After some playing around, believed to be the aftermarket solenoid. Well Ford, placing it on the fender is a well played move. Ten minutes and done.

I bet the engineer who came up with that has long been fired.

I then ripped down my eight year old Husky 445 for a cleaning. Still runs like a top.

20240224_110947.jpg


20240224_160114.jpg
 
Last edited:
While I detest Ford and pretty everything about them, I will give credit where its due. The 1999 F250 Superduty 5.4 was having some no crank situations. Battery was good, cleaned connections, shift linkage tight so its either the solenoid, starter or neutral safety switch. After some playing around, believed to be the aftermarket solenoid. Well Ford, placing it on the fender is a well played move. Ten minutes and done.

I bet the engineer who came up with that has long been fired.

I then ripped down my eight year old Husky 445 for a cleaning. Still runs like a top.

View attachment 205322

View attachment 205323
It also means with a pocket knife you don't care about or screwdriver you can always just jump across the big contacts to crank it.

Also nice with a remote start button for troubleshooting no spark from the engine bay. Aaaaaaannnndddd that leads us back to Team TFI and thus any Ford engineering prowess once again seems outweighed by their faux pas.....sigh

And I'm pretty much a "Ford guy"!!!!
 
IMG_7236.jpeg
IMG_7235.jpeg
IMG_7234.jpeg



Removing what I thought was grout but is 10 year old, hard, cracked, plumbers putty. What a cheap, lousy thing to use in the kitchen. Easy on the blade but stinks (smells musty, sulfury, old as I blade it). O-tool makes for quick work.

Will use 100 year caulk. White.
 
Last edited:
It also means with a pocket knife you don't care about or screwdriver you can always just jump across the big contacts to crank it.

Also nice with a remote start button for troubleshooting no spark from the engine bay. Aaaaaaannnndddd that leads us back to Team TFI and thus any Ford engineering prowess once again seems outweighed by their faux pas.....sigh

And I'm pretty much a "Ford guy"!!!!
Old Fords with contact ignitions; you could run a jumper wire from the +battery (post or solenoid) to the +side of the coil. Jump the solenoid and drive off. Of course, the contacts wouldn't last very long. Like stealing a Kia.
 
Back
Top