Originally Posted By: gizzsdad
........As to my other question - is a string of 16 weights really the best way to balance this assembly?....
Part of the problem - if I've understood your posts correctly - is that they are hiding the weights behind the spokes. That moves the weights inboard and sometimes requires weights to be placed in a less than optimal position - and that results in needing more weight.
But since you are going to seek out a GSP9700, if they find an assembly they can identify as suspect, have them measure the wheel for conventional weight placement - just a measurement - and while they are at it, measure the "bare rim". There is a setting for that. CAUTION: Most folks don't know how to interpret the "bare rim" results. Hunter mistakenly thinks that 0.026" is an acceptable amount of runout for a rim. A new unused rim ought to be within 0.005" - with 0.012" as acceptable.
........As to my other question - is a string of 16 weights really the best way to balance this assembly?....
Part of the problem - if I've understood your posts correctly - is that they are hiding the weights behind the spokes. That moves the weights inboard and sometimes requires weights to be placed in a less than optimal position - and that results in needing more weight.
But since you are going to seek out a GSP9700, if they find an assembly they can identify as suspect, have them measure the wheel for conventional weight placement - just a measurement - and while they are at it, measure the "bare rim". There is a setting for that. CAUTION: Most folks don't know how to interpret the "bare rim" results. Hunter mistakenly thinks that 0.026" is an acceptable amount of runout for a rim. A new unused rim ought to be within 0.005" - with 0.012" as acceptable.