By the way thank you for this, now I’m concerned because I had some CarQuest Full Synthetic 0w16 (4 quarts) and Valvoline Synthetic Blend 5w30 (2.5 quarts) left over and I did the last oil change (~2,700 miles) with that concoction and the engine is back spec’d for 0w20, and I don’t seem to have the right HTHS currently.
I have ~1,500 miles to an even 60k miles and I could change the oil then, or it’s crucial I change now? What do you guys recommend?
This concoction reduced the VVT-I gear noise on cold starts to once since the oil change from before where the startup noise was every other cold start, this is the only reason I was going to consider using a combination of this concoction again.
What do you guys recommend?
Thank You in advance
I recommend using a fully formulated lubricant of the proper grade
That's why you see two premium oils, in the proper grade, for the vehicles in my signature.
If you want a reason as to why the HTHS visc doesn't seem to go up to where you might expect it with KV100, it is how the oils are blended. A 0w-16 will use thin base oils with relatively little VII, because it doesn't need as much "padding" to get to its target KV100 and target HTHS. On the other hand, your typical Energy Conserving 10w-30 also starts out with pretty thin base oils, typically of lesser quality, and gets dosed with more VII in order to bring up the KV100, which in turn drags up the HTHS. If you blend an SAE30 with PAO to hit the same KV100 as the 10w-30 you are using it would have an HTHS closer to ~3.5cP (about the same as the Euro xW-30's that have a higher KV100) And in fact, a PAO-based SAE30 would pass the 10W-xx designation, so it could be labelled a 10w-30 or SAE30. The reason the HTHS is 0.5cP lower with our Energy Conserving example is because of the thinner base oils and VII used, this reduces the effective viscosity under shear (bearings) which is what the HTHS test tests for.
Thicker than the 10w-30 you are using, but here's a heavy duty 10w-30 (with a higher KV100) blended using Mobil's EHC Group II+ bases:
You can see it is a blend of 4.5cSt and 6.5cSt bases. The resultant product has a viscosity of 5.85cSt (thinner than the visc of your 0w-16). It is bumped up to 11.9 using VII polymer, which in turn is how we get our 3.5cP HTHS. This, as I'm sure you've noticed, is a fair bit heavier than the 10.5cSt of your Castrol Edge.
If we look at Redline 10w-30, which is pretty close to a straight grade, it's 11.4cSt, so thinner than our blend here, but still manages the 3.5cP HTHS. The same goes for AMSOIL Dominator 10w-30, 11.5cSt, HTHS of 3.6cP. These oils use significantly heavier base oils and no, or next to no VII.
So, when you add the 10w-30 to the 0w-16, the resultant KV100 is easily calculated and lands around xW-20 as planned. However, because of how the 10w-30 is formulated, the HTHS is lower.
Now, if you were using a 3.5cP HTHS 10w-30 like the Redline or AMSOIL ones I just mentioned, and 70% 0w-16, that appears (again, just using the calculator) to put you at 2.61cP for HTHS and your KV100 would be ~8.4cSt, smack-dab in the middle of your desired xW-20 range.
Now, all this said, we aren't actually running the HTHS test on these blends, so these aren't measured figures. However, we DO have the approximate figures for the products themselves and we are essentially just ratio-ing them.
Another data point, just to for fun:
Pennzoil Hybrid 0w-16:
KV40: 38.2cSt
KV100: 7.6cSt
VI: 172
KV150: 3.47 (calculated)
HTHS: ~2.3cP
If we look at the same figures for a PAO base oil, that won't shear:
XOM SpectraSyn 8
KV40: 48cSt
KV100: 8.0cSt
VI: 139
KV150: 3.44cSt (calculated)
HTHS: 2.58cP
So even though the PAO base oil has a lower KV150, because it doesn't have VII polymers in it to flatten out under the shear test, the HTHS is higher (and yes, that base oil passes the criteria for a 5w-20, lol).
Ultimately, this is why oils are fully formulated and tested products and why I don't recommend people play the mixing game at home, particularly when using application-specific products like these new 0w-8, 0w-12 and 0w-16 lubricants as a foundation in an engine that doesn't call for them. While engines are generally quite tolerant, I wouldn't want to be the person that recommends something that causes damage.