I'm not saying or suggesting that this applies to anyone here. But most of the people that I have come to meet and know over the years, who always claim they'll NEVER retire, are telling the truth...... But only because they can't afford to.
Maybe this might provide some supplemental information to your retirement critical thinking:I'm not saying or suggesting that this applies to anyone here. But most of the people that I have come to meet and know over the years, who always claim they'll NEVER retire, are telling the truth...... But only because they can't afford to.
The system is likely to go defunct in the near future. Take it early.
A SS check in the hand is worth two in the bush.
This is very important to think about. Once you take it, you're effectively "locked in". And it's doubtful they'll take any of it away from you. But there is no doubt as time marches on, they may very well keep pushing the retirement age further and further out.Consider that cost cutting changes are likely. By taking it soonest, there may be a chance of being 'grandfathered' in, and COLA (cost of living) changes may remain intact. All of that is just guessing.
Age at death for the average American man is 73.3 +/- a few tenths depending on year. Women's substantially longer lives should not factor in with regard to a man's SS planning. Yet here we are looking at 'average lifespan' rather inaccurately.
I am 61, retired and not all that well. I'd be a fool to wait. My father lived to 70 with the last 5 years an utter disaster, and I'm heading down much the same path.
I like my odds. Longevity runs in my family. There's a good change that the SSA will pay my wrinkled old butt all the way to 100.Consider that cost cutting changes are likely. By taking it soonest, there may be a chance of being 'grandfathered' in, and COLA (cost of living) changes may remain intact. All of that is just guessing.
Age at death for the average American man is 73.3 +/- a few tenths depending on year. Women's substantially longer lives should not factor in with regard to a man's SS planning. Yet here we are looking at 'average lifespan' rather inaccurately.
I am 61, retired and not all that well. I'd be a fool to wait. My father lived to 70 with the last 5 years an utter disaster, and I'm heading down much the same path.
Yikes, I too would be enamored with retirement if I had a career like you describe.While all of that may be true for people like Buffett, and certain other entrepreneurs who built big companies from the ground up, it doesn't hold true for most others.... At least if they're somewhat honest with themselves.
I worked for 45 years in the metals trades, counting my apprenticeship. I liked my job OK, but the hours were long, and got tougher as I got older. (Standing for 10 to 12 hours a day on a concrete floor 6 days a week, is highly overrated).
Ouch! I said it somewhere else here recently. Why wait for retirement for bliss??The last 10 years have been blissfully satisfying.
All those things apply to me. I like my work, I'm paid a lot more than I ever thought I'd make for the next few years due to stock incentives. The stress level is fairly low. Unlimited PTO. Very cool and understanding boss. My team is great. I have no debt. Might as well ride it out another year or two.Maybe this might provide some supplemental information to your retirement critical thinking:
Reasons someone might choose not to retire include: a strong sense of purpose and fulfillment in their current job, enjoying the social interaction with colleagues, wanting to maximize their Social Security benefits by delaying claiming them, financial concerns that might not be met in retirement, a desire to continue learning and growing professionally, and not feeling ready to give up the structure and routine of work; essentially, if someone feels their life is richer and more meaningful by continuing to work, they might choose to delay retirement.
I sense Warren Buffett accredits retirement significantly different than you.
View attachment 263087
Same here. I retired from my city fire department with full pension and benefits at 52. I had worked jobs before during and shortly after the fire department so I have over twenty five years of SS contributions and I am glad the WEP penalty has been eliminated. I don’t turn 62 till 2026 and will likely claim at 62. All my financial planning centered around only being able to receive 33% of full retirement benefits so getting 100% of 62 is icing on the cake.I retired (on a full service pension) at age 49 and started taking SS at 62. As a two time cancer survivor, I don't regret my decision at all. I should note that the amount I qualified (worked) for and the amount I received was substantially different because of WEP. I always had a second job that paid SS but because I had a pension they cut my SS by nearly half. Allegedly, I'm due to get the full amount and back pay for just over a year. But I haven't seen it and am not holding my breath.
This is incorrect. Warren Buffett has paid no more than many other Americans pay each year, including many in this forumHaHa Warren buffet is a step or two above all of us. I am 100% certain that
What sad? he has more than likely paid billions into the SS system. Presonally. BH has probably paid multiple Trillions through the years.
- …
Again he is having fun. Who cares right. I mean look at him. He has a propetual smile on his face all the time. Good for him!!