Valvoline Restore and Protect in Skyactiv Engine

Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
18
Location
san diego
Just wanted to toss some info out there for the higher mileage Skyactiv owners out there on the fence for Valvoline Restore and Protect oil.

These engines run cooler than most, and as a result rarely burn oil or SEEM to generate much sludge. When I removed the valve cover at 160k the engine was spotless. I never thought they would benefit from an oil to remove deposits like this. I’ve run STRICTLY Castrol EDGE High Mileage 0w20 in the last 80k hard commuting miles. 5-7k OCI/OEM filters. Car gets run up to higher RPM and spirited driving frequently.

Currently at just over 240k, zero oil consumption. Best car/engine I’ve ever had. Recently when attempting to merge on the freeway, car lost 90% of power and CEL came on. First time in 240k it’s ever come on.

Code for intake VVT stuck retarded. Drain/filled with Valvoline Restore and Protect 0w20. Let it idle like an hour, cleaned the code. Drove around. Problem gone. Over the next several days of driving, car ran smoother and smoother. Noticeably easier/more willing to rev (manual), and you can notice a smoother transition as the VVT actuates through the RPM range. No sign whatsoever of that issue coming back.

My takeaways- strict 5k OCIs are probably important for this engine, on this site people like to run these ridiculously long OCIs, wouldn’t recommend for this car. The last 2 times I pushed 4-months/7k due to extended freeway percentage. Never again.

VVT in these Skyactivs is definitely the one place sludge hides. There are some Mazda TSBs with this issue across all models, and they all call for replacement of VVT components. Given tariff situation, a SINGLE VVT gear is $700 MSRP at the dealer right now. Any solution that doesn’t involve that is probably a good one.

Long term I will probably go back to Edge, and just run 4-5k OCIs for awhile. But the Valvoline Restore and Protect is a great solution for solving this potentially expensive and wide spread issue with Mazda VVT issues.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just wanted to toss some info out there for the higher mileage Skyactiv owners out there on the fence for Valvoline Restore and Protect oil.

These engines run cooler than most, and as a result rarely burn oil or SEEM to generate much sludge. When I removed the valve cover at 160k the engine was spotless. I never thought they would benefit from an oil to remove deposits like this. I’ve run STRICTLY Castrol EDGE High Mileage 0w20 in the last 80k hard commuting miles. 5-7k OCI/OEM filters. Car gets run up to higher RPM and spirited driving frequently.

Currently at just over 240k, zero oil consumption. Best car/engine I’ve ever had. Recently when attempting to merge on the freeway, car lost 90% of power and CEL came on. First time in 240k it’s ever come on.

Code for intake VVT stuck retarded. Drain/filled with Valvoline Restore and Protect 0w20. Let it idle like an hour, cleaned the code. Drove around. Problem gone. Over the next several days of driving, car ran smoother and smoother. Noticeably easier/more willing to rev (manual), and you can notice a smoother transition as the VVT actuates through the RPM range. No sign whatsoever of that issue coming back.

My takeaways- strict 5k OCIs are probably important for this engine, on this site people like to run these ridiculously long OCIs, wouldn’t recommend for this car. The last 2 times I pushed 4-months/7k due to extended freeway percentage. Never again.

VVT in these Skyactivs is definitely the one place sludge hides. There are some Mazda TSBs with this issue across all models, and they all call for replacement of VVT components. Given tariff situation, a SINGLE VVT gear is $700 MSRP at the dealer right now. Any solution that doesn’t involve that is probably a good one.

Long term I will probably go back to Edge, and just run 4-5k OCIs for awhile. But the Valvoline Restore and Protect is a great solution for solving this potentially expensive and wide spread issue with Mazda VVT issues.
You should just stick with Valvoline Restore and Protect IMO. Makes no sense to switch back, especially at 5k OCI.

Deposits/varnish will eventually buildup. It's inevitable over time. The only difference is the rate of buildup.
 
You should just stick with Valvoline Restore and Protect IMO. Makes no sense to switch back, especially at 5k OCI.

Deposits/varnish will eventually buildup. It's inevitable over time. The only difference is the rate of buildup.
I agreed, why would you change when Valvoline Restore and Protect has such good wear #s. Plus, a Valvoline oil engineer stated on a Youtube interview, they are seeing a slight "possible" reduction in valve carbon. I would assume he is talking GDI engine. Win win.
 
At the current rate of progress - Valvoline Restore and Protect will rebuild its first engine in 2026 ! 😷
I will bit, since I think it was for my comment. Progress, there is none. It's novel, so you don't even know yet it's final pathway of cleaning. And it appears the Valvoline oil engineer gave a hint with his comment he did not want to state as fact yet, but data might be, with valve guide leakage and PVC Valvoline Restore and Protect vapors, we may possibly have some stoppage or even some reduction in valve carbon. Far from your statement. :)
 
I’m on the 2nd OCI using Valvoline Restore and Protect with my 2018 Mazda CX3 2.0L Skyactiv. It only has 49k miles on it with no issues after 5 years of ownership. I decided earlier this year it will get Valvoline Restore and Protect 5w30 every 5k miles or 6 months from here on out. I could save $12 going with Supertech but the benefits seem to outweigh that small cost.
 
I’m on the 2nd OCI using Valvoline Restore and Protect with my 2018 Mazda CX3 2.0L Skyactiv. It only has 49k miles on it with no issues after 5 years of ownership. I decided earlier this year it will get Valvoline Restore and Protect 5w30 every 5k miles or 6 months from here on out. I could save $12 going with Supertech but the benefits seem to outweigh that small cost.
Sounds like a good plan, but I would do 5k miles or 1 year
 
Sounds like a good plan, but I would do 5k miles or 1 year
I did consider the 1 year OCI but the car does get some short trip driving and that has me concerned about fuel dilution.
At the six month mark the oil has a fairly strong odor of gasoline.
 
I did consider the 1 year OCI but the car does get some short trip driving and that has me concerned about fuel dilution.
At the six month mark the oil has a fairly strong odor of gasoline.

Even with that, 1 year should be just fine. Unless you are really only doing short trips. In which case 5k miles is already too much
 
Resurrecting an old thread, but thanks for the Skyactiv related info. My 2016 is at 175k and I'm going from 7.5k to 5k intervals. Might go Valvoline Restore and Protect but for now I'm doing Kirkland 0w20.
 
Back
Top Bottom