Valvoline Restore and Protect Euro

Just bought two jugs (10 Liters) of the 5w-40 wich is recomended for BMW-LL04, MB229.51, VW 505.01 and Porsche A40.
While it´s no offcial approvals, i trust Valvoline when the say "Recommended for...".
I am happy that it finnaly arrived here and in the proper 5w-40 viscositiy range wich is hugely popular here.

What are you guys in Germany using in your BMW B58s, the 5W40 oil you speak of?
 
Just bought two jugs (10 Liters) of the 5w-40 wich is recomended for BMW-LL04, MB229.51, VW 505.01 and Porsche A40.
While it´s no offcial approvals, i trust Valvoline when the say "Recommended for...".
I am happy that it finnaly arrived here and in the proper 5w-40 viscositiy range wich is hugely popular here.
Is this the first VRP Euro purchase on the board??

Can you post photos of the bottle (front and back)?

Thanks!
 
It may be suitable. But it's going to be a hard sell to most VW/Audi/Porsche/BMW/MB owners without seeing any "Approved", or at the very minimum "Meets" to these Euro manufacturer specs. I won't put it in any of my Euro engines without this.
Hmmm I have 3 and have no problem using the one we have now. Looking forward to the other one.
 
Your question implies that there is really only one function of motor oil that matters - how well it cleans.
The opposite, keeping things clean.
. Hopefully most here on BITOG know better.
What they know and what they post is up to them.
European specifications put emphasis on low SAPS, but also put a very healthy dose of phosphorus and zinc for wear protection.
The Phos and Zinc statement.
Some Euro oils, such as Mobil 1 ESP, use so much that they do not meet SN, SP or SQ specs.
As long as the engine is not burning oil, no big deal.
BMW puts a lot of emphasis on HT/HS, which is also an indicator of wear.
This HT/HS, at what oil temperature does this really matter?
 
Here we go.
Made in the Netherlands. The german fineprint clearly states that this oil is made of Hydrocrack base oil. No markting Bla-Bla.

IMG_20260630_172619.webp


IMG_20260630_172628.webp


IMG_20260630_172624.webp
 
Because it's under the chemical limit of min.1% SA ... min.P content of 900ppm. and min.TBN of 10mgKOH/g that 502.00 demands.Probably for similar reasons they have not listed it as MB 229.5 "recommended". This cautious approach by Valvoline is commendable (other blenders would have shamelessly listed two dozens of "satisfied" OEM specs).
 
Being Mid/Low SAPS makes sense as it's designed to go in engines that are burning oil and killing their cats.
It is what it is and it's not something else. If it's not what you want it to be 🤷‍♂️
 
So you don’t want to define “unapproved”

That’s all you had to say.

Don’t take people asking you a legitimate question so personally
Why would I define it? It's very easy to look this up yourself, should be simple to understand. Are you implying something else?
 
Back
Top Bottom