Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
Originally Posted by Al
Quote
I would not use deadly force to protect a generator.
Of course not. You are in the peoples republic of NY. You could in other states. But I wouldn't anyway. You would be sued and it only takes 7 jurists to convict.
Chain it up...seriously.
Which states, Al?
Maybe you can leave valuable things in your yard as an excuse to shoot people, in Pennsylvania? I mean, should we kill people that steal Amazon packages? Maybe. But what happens when old man big-internet-balls accidentally sends bullets into his neighbors houses or God forbid kills a kid unintentionally when spraying the neighborhood with well intentioned, crime-fighting lead?
But yeah, chain your generator up FFS...
I think you're taking the point wrong.
He's not advocating shooting for property, he's saying that you can use deadly force to defend against a life-threatening act.
If your grandmother needed her oxygen tank to live, and a criminal was stealing it, can you use deadly force to stop the theft? The theft will kill her. It is a lethal threat. A proportional response (lethal force against lethal threat) is not unreasonable.
Now, is the generator loss life-threatening? Well, in the blizzard and cold, the OP has suggested that it is.
I would not, personally, kill over that generator, I would take other means of security.
How would a jury see this?
I've got no idea...they might agree with the proportionality argument. They might not.