Upate on minivan Bruceblend 0w-10 project (long)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 28, 2002
Messages
39,798
Well, it's been awhile ..so I'll tell you what I've got done. Keep in mind that I'm on a budget and have some time restraints for tinkering ..so the advancement is slow. I've had a couple of minor milestones conquered ..so I'll share them.

First let me say that I've had no consumption to date. No ticks or complaints out of the HLAs ..regardless of the oil temp. It's been run mainly in urban semi-taxi service for the past 2.5 months ..but has seen highway usage on a regular basis. Since this involves two coolant:oil heat exchangers ..oil warming was never an issue.

The challenges/problems:

The Mitsubishi 3.0 V6 must have a very delicately balanced cooling system with virtually no reserve capacity at idle. Hindsight sees why there's a heater control valve ..and we assume that the heater core is of inherently high resistance to flow. By running this full flow, I was robbing the system of capacity to push coolant across the radiator. My only concern/symptom is that the idle fan cycle is extremely long. Where normally a minute would be long, now 5 minutes is not uncommon. You can watch the oil temps cycle up and down with the fan running. The PCM must have a fairly broad set point for the on:off action.

In an attempt to keep the water flow intact (which essentially bypasses the radiator being T'd into the heat circuit below the heater control valve) and unload some of the excess coolant btu's AND keep the oil temp lower, I installed a Hayden tube fin oil cooler that I bought on Ebay a few years ago. I'm unsure of its efficiency, but it's plenty big (about 24x12). This resulted in no real difference in idle oil or coolant temps but did maintain highway oil temps @ 175F+/-. So, high speed control appeared to have been achieved.

I was about to install my Permacool oil thermostat to cut out the Hayden until the oil had reached higher temps (according to Permacool this modulates at around 180F) when I got a revelation. If I plug both outlet ports of the oil thermostat and run it in line with the outlet coolant line to the exchangers, it will choke off most of the flow when it reaches 180F.

This worked, sorta. The oil thermostat indeed works as designed in this capacity. Unfortunately, I still have the long fan cycling ..but now the oil is at a much lower temperature. Instead of (at idle) watching it go from 195F to 205F and then back down to 190F (and repeat), I now see 185F as a peak ..and will even have a negative exchange rate. That is, the oil will come out of the motor @ 185F and return @ 180F (+/- a few ticks). This shows that the coolant must be below 180F at that point in the engine.

My next installation is an addition oil thermostat where I had intended it to be ..taking the Hayden out of the equation until the oil warms to 180F. The other side effect of this coolant flow adjustment is that highway speeds can drive the oil temp below 160F ..which kinda overshoots the target of making this 10 weight oil appear like a 20 weight at operating temp.

I'll also be replacing the OEM sender (OBDI = sensor and sender) with a digital thermal couple and add that reading to my dash so I can get a grip on what the sensor is seeing to run the fan.

My next step on attempting to choke the flow a bit more may be to reduce the current 5/8" lines to 1/2" or even to 3/8". This, naturally, adds more clamps and nylon reducers. I had considered seeing if I could find a TCS vacuum switch of the right range and have it automatically close a vacuum controled valve ..but that's more research than I want to get into.

This is one cobbled together setup ..but we're getting there.
dunno.gif


Once everything is setup I'll run a baseline warm up time. Before I put in the thermostat choke ..it would stabilize in about 10 miles (9 of that being highway @ 60-65 mph - or about 10 minutes from turning the key). After this new benchmark, I'll install dual big filters after the oil thermostat ..but before the Hayden cooler. This should show if a 10+ quart sump can warm as fast as a 6,5 quart sump (it appears that the Eaton exchangers and the Hayden cache about a quart and a half of oil).

I want to do a UOA on the current fill ..but with so many new/used parts (the new Hayden is copper and I'm using used 80's Crown Vic 351 police package lines) and the number of times I've tinkered with the hoses and fittings, I'm uncertain if anything would be gleaned from it at this time. I believe that I'll do a change out when I add the big filters ..at which time I'll do a few hundred mile "in engine VOA" and then follow up with a 3k UOA to see what's up.

I'll snap some pic's of the current setup and post them in a few hours. The octopus is getting wild.
 
Why are you trying to run your oil temp below what I would consider the ideal 190F to 215F?
 
The idea is to run it @ 180F (or within as narrow a range off if it) to simulate a 20 weight at operating temp. Hence you get all the (lack of) parasitic losses of a 10 weight oil during warm up, without loss of visc at normalized operating temps. You just manipulate the normalized operating temp to make it a 20 weight. The 180F figure is compliments of my poverty and Permacool's generic temp regulation.

195-200F does put it just at the near bottom of the 20 weight span, though (6CST @ 200F).
Vis @ 40 29.4
Vis @ 100 5.2
VI 105
..the super robust add pack put it very near the top of the 10 weight range. Bruce was liberal with the adds. He's not used to blending in 5 gallon batches
grin.gif


Moly 2146 ppm
Zinc 2085 ppm
Phos 1827 ppm
TBN 11.5

Bruce suggested that I could have run this "nekid" without any cooling ..but this is compounding a number of tests in one bundle. If this works out as expected, then I'll save up my nickels for a Mocal oil thermostat that I can order at 195F or 200F. That will bring it to the near bottom of the 20 span.

Heck, if the results prove to be favorable, I will run it unaided in forced heating or cooling
dunno.gif


This started originally to explore the (suggested by Curious Kid) viability of a two tier sump. Where a smaller amount of oil was circulated during warm up to aid in reducing parasitic losses due to visc, while maintaining the normal resiliency of a normal sized sump. Now I couldn't shrink my 5 quart sump to 2 ..but I could test if a 8 or 10 quart sump warmed as fast as a 5 quart sump with thermostats and exchangers. The next evolution in thought was "Well, if you can start off with really thin oil, heat it really fast, and limit its peak temp..........you can have it all.

So, sure, we hope to reach true 10 weight status ...but I'm going to take a few incremental steps before I get there. Along the way a few other things are going to be explored.

In the old engine, running 220F didn't appear to be a problem with a 20 weight oil. Pressures were very healthy and peak temps were at highway speeds indexed somewhat for ambient and load (whether one passenger or 6-7). I didn't have any UOA data to prove anything. At the time I was leaning more toward filter testing and proving to myself the true duration of the warm up cycle.
dunno.gif
 
What the chemists at the oil companies need to come up with is a shear stable non-linear acting VI improver. Something that will make a 0w-10-20-40 oil possible. A VI improver that gives the vis of a 10 wt oil at temps between 70F and 180F, moves to a 20 wt at 180F and holds that up to 220F, and above 220F moves into the 30 and 40 wt range.
 
Quote:


This is one cobbled together setup ..but we're getting there.


Well Gary, you're braver than I am. I would not be able to sleep at night will all that plumbing hanging off my engine. I'd be scared to death of something working loose and leaving an oil slick with the consequent fried engine at the side of the road. But then it has been a mark of great scientists to brave unknown dangers for the good of mankind (or ah, BITOG-kind).
patriot.gif
 
Yes, Gman, something with a 5 CST @ 302F with a VI of 900+ should do it. Someday maybe
dunno.gif


TallPaul: It's not as bad as you think. There's nothing here that can't be returned to normal without an adjustable and a screw driver. There's a case of Havoline 5w-20 in the back and a gallon of antifreeze ..and a spare filter. Spin off the filter ..remove the sandwich (or just connect the ends of the hoses together - I've got a double male fitting) ..there's ample on board stock of hose (if you're unhooking it) to bridge anything ...and lots of clamps too.

Don't get me wrong ...I'm somewhat tired of "oh ...get out another gender changer or hose reducer (which may include two more clamps for the cooling system end of it). Much of this octopus is that way simply because I don't care how it looks like(you should see the small section of cheap throw rug I have as a cushion between the exchangers and the intake) and I didn't want an additional set of connections for right angle coolant adapters. They add up.

Right now I'm pondering some type of orifice coolant restrictor to bring the rad flow back into a closer proximity to OEM. Just enough to reduce the fan cycling. If I was convinced that I'm not going to restore the air conditioning system at some point, I'd gut the condenser out of the cavity and put another radiator (some cooler - the setup in the Caravan is side by side for the condenser and rad) and bypass it with another thermostat so that it only works when hot. I can rig the AC fan relay to trigger off of the other fan's relay when the ground signal is enabled from the PCM.

As I hope that you've gathered, it can be challenging doing mods. It's not nice to fool (with) mother Mitsubishi.
wink.gif


Here ...look at the throw rug piece ...the van needs a bath.
grin.gif


Anyone giving out points for neatness at this stage of the game???
laugh.gif
I don't think this setup is permanent.

setupnow006hk0.jpg

setupnow005um5.jpg

setupnow004lq7.jpg

setupnow003mv2.jpg

setupnow002vy7.jpg

setupnow001zf8.jpg

haydengrillbp3.jpg
 
Yes. It's the infamous 3.0 in the bread and butter trim. You were expecting a 4 cam twin turbo in a Stealth, perhaps?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom