Is there a problem generic to this engine family, or could this just be a badly built example?
Would this engine show less wear metal in a UOA were a thicker oil used?
OTOH, is this wear really abnormal for this engine family?
As you have noted elsewhere, we are talking about parts per million and this engine design may just tend to shed more metal than most of those we see.
If PU really is all that, this engine may need something more than a thirty grade, or can you think of a scenario where another API SN thirty grade would likely give better results?
If I were the OP, I wouldn't be turning cartwheels over the wear numbers my newly broken in engine is showing.
I'd be a little concerned, although if current wear metal numbers remain consistent over the miles, I'd feel a little better.
Would this engine show less wear metal in a UOA were a thicker oil used?
OTOH, is this wear really abnormal for this engine family?
As you have noted elsewhere, we are talking about parts per million and this engine design may just tend to shed more metal than most of those we see.
If PU really is all that, this engine may need something more than a thirty grade, or can you think of a scenario where another API SN thirty grade would likely give better results?
If I were the OP, I wouldn't be turning cartwheels over the wear numbers my newly broken in engine is showing.
I'd be a little concerned, although if current wear metal numbers remain consistent over the miles, I'd feel a little better.