I read this in the recently locked thread:
Quote:
I see threads being locked only when they get nasty. It's pretty liberal most of the time.
Is it me, or did most take this as a political view?
I took it as the enforcement of the rules is done in a liberal, instead of draconian fashion. Let it run unless there is an issue.
It seems many on that thread took it as the site is politically liberal, which others scoffed at or supported in one form or another.
Wouldn't it be good form to ask the person who posted that what they meant, rather than just assume and then argue against it?
My theory is behavior like that, assuming meaning and arguing against that assumption is what leads the power to be to avoid such discussion.
Thoughts?
Quote:
I see threads being locked only when they get nasty. It's pretty liberal most of the time.
Is it me, or did most take this as a political view?
I took it as the enforcement of the rules is done in a liberal, instead of draconian fashion. Let it run unless there is an issue.
It seems many on that thread took it as the site is politically liberal, which others scoffed at or supported in one form or another.
Wouldn't it be good form to ask the person who posted that what they meant, rather than just assume and then argue against it?
My theory is behavior like that, assuming meaning and arguing against that assumption is what leads the power to be to avoid such discussion.
Thoughts?