The old (2005 or 2006) 32" Sharp television we have in our bedroom finally went out. Many years of faithful service (though, if I'm honest, it doesn't have a ton of hours, being only a bedroom TV). We replaced it with a 32" Sharp Roku TV. We really like it -- super crisp display (1080p) and excellent Roku integration.
The screen printing on the back lists it as a 45W power supply inside the TV. The old TV said 170W. That sounds quite high to me (especially the 170W rating). I suppose a television has a relatively steady power supply requirement (unlike a PC, which can vary with differing loads), so I suppose the unit probably runs close to what that stated wattage is, right?
If so, and if these numbers are both apples (to be able to make a direct comparison), it's remarkable how more efficient these displays have become over the years. The 170W unit was a 720p LCD display and the 45W is a 1080p display. Think most of the efficiency gain is due to LED vs. LCD technology?
The screen printing on the back lists it as a 45W power supply inside the TV. The old TV said 170W. That sounds quite high to me (especially the 170W rating). I suppose a television has a relatively steady power supply requirement (unlike a PC, which can vary with differing loads), so I suppose the unit probably runs close to what that stated wattage is, right?
If so, and if these numbers are both apples (to be able to make a direct comparison), it's remarkable how more efficient these displays have become over the years. The 170W unit was a 720p LCD display and the 45W is a 1080p display. Think most of the efficiency gain is due to LED vs. LCD technology?