MolaKule
Staff member
...It softened up the shifts some, as both trans are designed(by designed I mean software calibration) for WS. Now if I could CHANGE that software, I would be good....but there is nothing available. And there are no upgrades/mods from the aftermarket. Typical failure is planetary/and/or bushing failure in first 2 gears...
Yes, you have stated that at least three times so no need to repeat.
The reason my thinking that higher vis is going to help, is that this ONLY happens on these when used hard/full load. Really this trans is past design limit in this application, thats why they have torque limiting in first 2 gears. Maybe I didn't explain as clear as I should have so I'll try again. So
Torque Limiting is used to lengthen the life of various components, such as the differential, U-joints, mounts, the engine, and transmission.
Torque limiting is primarily for the benefit of the engine in order to reduce internal parts stresses as it limits rpm in the lower gears.
Most AT's are designed to accommodate at least 10% more torque than the max engine torque.
What are the max torques of these engines and transmissions?
I would prefer to keep vis up around 7 to 7.5, as im HOPING this will increase the life/stave off a failure of geartrain. Maybe it wont, but I'm not going to just leave as is and hope for the best.
Ok then use https://amsoilcontent.com/ams/lit/databulletins/g1646.pdf and T4 or WS and report back your ratios and shift performance.
However a change of about 1 cSt of viscosity is NOT going to result in an increase in film strength for the planetary gears or bushings/bearings.
Tracking, using an unmodified transmission, is going to result in transmission rebuilds so I would recommend saving up for those rebuilds, regardless of the fluid or mix of fluids used.
Last edited: