jk_636
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: Mystic
I just now checked out the Tufoil website and they are still using as far as I can determine some of the advertising they were using literally years ago. Can't they at least have some new advertising? I don't think you will see Exxon/Mobil running the same commercial for 20 years.
Some of the statements they are making and examples they give are exactly the same, as far as I can determine, as when I last used Tufoil, which was a very long time ago. I last used Tufoil some time before 1994 when I bought my first Saturn new car. So something like 20 years. I did not use Tufoil in any new car that I bought.
The website itself is different in appearance but I distinctly remember some of the examples they used. As far as I am able to determine some of the examples are word for word the same. For example they have a diagram that supposedly shows how much better Tufoil reduces friction compared to various motor oils. To the best of my memory that is the same diagram that I saw many years ago.
Maybe they need some updated advertising and new examples.
The document they sent me was published in the Tufoil News by Fluoramics Inc., Septemeber 1993. I think these are the EXACT same examples you saw 20 years ago. Not that it means it is a terrible product, but speaking strictly as a consumer, I would have liked to see more recent research / testing.
I just now checked out the Tufoil website and they are still using as far as I can determine some of the advertising they were using literally years ago. Can't they at least have some new advertising? I don't think you will see Exxon/Mobil running the same commercial for 20 years.
Some of the statements they are making and examples they give are exactly the same, as far as I can determine, as when I last used Tufoil, which was a very long time ago. I last used Tufoil some time before 1994 when I bought my first Saturn new car. So something like 20 years. I did not use Tufoil in any new car that I bought.
The website itself is different in appearance but I distinctly remember some of the examples they used. As far as I am able to determine some of the examples are word for word the same. For example they have a diagram that supposedly shows how much better Tufoil reduces friction compared to various motor oils. To the best of my memory that is the same diagram that I saw many years ago.
Maybe they need some updated advertising and new examples.
The document they sent me was published in the Tufoil News by Fluoramics Inc., Septemeber 1993. I think these are the EXACT same examples you saw 20 years ago. Not that it means it is a terrible product, but speaking strictly as a consumer, I would have liked to see more recent research / testing.
Last edited: