Originally Posted By: ARB1977
Originally Posted By: benjamming
That Tacoma should be a non-interference type if I'm not badly mistaken so much less to lose in the event of a failure.
Yea its non-interference.
Relax.....I've owned a number of Toyotas' (both 4 and 6 cyl) that have went over 150K miles on the original belt, tensioner and pulleys. Currently own a 96 Camry (2.2L 4 cyl) with 162K miles and the belt shows no signs of deterioration.
Originally Posted By: benjamming
That Tacoma should be a non-interference type if I'm not badly mistaken so much less to lose in the event of a failure.
Yea its non-interference.
Relax.....I've owned a number of Toyotas' (both 4 and 6 cyl) that have went over 150K miles on the original belt, tensioner and pulleys. Currently own a 96 Camry (2.2L 4 cyl) with 162K miles and the belt shows no signs of deterioration.