The Danger Ranger - 2003 Ford Ranger 2WD 3L 5spd

Owned a 2000 with an auto and the similar 2.5 not the 2.3. But both are solid. The trans went nearing 400k but the rest of it was falling apart so i kicked it. They're solid trucks so this is a good buy, doesn't seem to need much. The broken leaf spring is odd. I've tortured my rangers rear suspension and it never gave me an issue. Never even changed the shocks in the 15 years i had it.
Hopefully these clowns didn’t own it…
 
According to Edmunds:
Powertrains and Performance: Three engines are available. Standard on XL and XLT 2WD regular cabs is a 2.3-liter inline four-cylinder engine making 135 horsepower and 153 pound-feet of torque. Four-wheel-drive regular cabs, as well as Edge and Tremor, regular cab 4WD, and SuperCab 2WD models are powered by a 3.0-liter V6 that makes 154 horsepower and 180 pound-feet of torque. At the top of the engine chart is a 4.0-liter overhead cam V6 making 207 horsepower and 238 pound-feet of torque.

So they are saying the 2.3L was 135HP, so the Vulcan was a wild 19HP more :D
143 in 2003 135 in 2002

So 11HP? 😂
 
Congratulations. I saw a 97 step side at a car show in June. It was pristine and to my surprise it qualified for collector plates in BC since it was over 25 years old and in perfect shape. I had a red 88 short box. I highly recommend real winter tires as there is not much weight on the back wheels. Mine would spin it’s BF Goodrich radial TA’s in two inches of snow.
 
A friend I worked with had a late 80's Ranger he bought new and the thing about his four cylinder was the fact it had two spark plugs per cylinder.He left where we worked together in 2005 and I ran into three years later and he still had it running.Those trucks were boxy looking but built Ford tough.I'm sure by now it's history.
 
So I've found 5 answers at this point.. none of which are the same.

here is another Which as you posted I now suspect is the correct one.
ord DuratecI4
(Mazda L3-NS)
138 cu in (2.3 L) DOHC 16V I4late 2001-20122001-2003: 135 hp (101 kW) 153 lb⋅ft (207 N⋅m)
2004-2011: 143 hp (107 kW) 154 lb⋅ft (209 N⋅m)

At least the vulcan numbers seem to agree between all sources.
 
Last edited:
Well, it's "on the road" kind of. He has got it insured finally and it has a trip permit (it has plates and it's in his name) so he can get it in for its safety next week. A few, relatively minor, issues have emerged:
- Door switch kept killing the battery. He's pulled the interior bulb for now, but that's clearly not a long term solution. I've told him how to track it down, I'm letting him grow his troubleshooting skills, so he'll be doing some work on that tomorrow. It got a new battery tonight, as the old one was no longer any good. Of course the battery that was in there was not the right size :ROFLMAO:
- It popped out of gear on me at an intersection today (trying to teach him how to drive stick), think it may need the trans fluid changed. Only did it once, but it goes in and out of gear super smooth and easily.
- Driver-side headlight is missing one of the retaining nuts, so it moves about. He needs to fix that.


Otherwise, it drives really well for a 21 year old truck (of course it has new suspension). It's geared pretty deep, so you can be in 5th at 40mph and loafing along at 1,500RPM. The Vulcan is no speed demon, but seems to have plenty of torque, so it's a great vehicle to learn to drive manual on, very forgiving.

He's out in it now, working on his driving skills when there's little traffic, seems very happy that this journey is finally bearing fruit.

4A9EAD56-E7A4-4BDB-93DC-C0E2A85D5775_1_105_c.webp
 
Actually it occurred to me if you deliberately installed a failed "synchronizer" not-distributor it would drive fine until 3k at which point it'd fall on its face.

It's like built-in parental controls :D
 
How did the truck survive 21 years of road salt?
Well, it didn't completely, it had to have work on the rockers and it needs the fuel tank crossmember replaced to pass safety, found that out yesterday. It has fared well, given its age, but has not gotten here unscathed.
 
Update:

Getting new tires today. Also, I determined it needed a U-joint (son was complaining about a chirping noise at low speeds taking off), which was confirmed by the dealership when they did the tires today (my Chrysler dealer). It has an aluminum DS so they sent it out to a driveline shop to get done, should be back tomorrow.

Being price conscious but wanting something "all terrain", we deliberated and the decision ended up being a set of Toyo Open Country A/T III's:
IMG_7132.webp

IMG_7133.webp


Which were rated really well on TireRack, and that has served us well with the Conti's we have on the RAM that we are quite pleased with.

It DOES have a limited slip rear end, so I do expect that he's going to (try to?) take it places I probably wouldn't, lol.

He needs to change the power steering fluid and I think we need to clean the IAC. 22 year old vehicles, lol. I had him pick up 3ft of 3/8ths fuel line the other day and we replaced all the dry rotted vacuum lines (EVAP and breather) that were collapsing and ready to leak.
 
Update:

Getting new tires today. Also, I determined it needed a U-joint (son was complaining about a chirping noise at low speeds taking off), which was confirmed by the dealership when they did the tires today (my Chrysler dealer). It has an aluminum DS so they sent it out to a driveline shop to get done, should be back tomorrow.

Being price conscious but wanting something "all terrain", we deliberated and the decision ended up being a set of Toyo Open Country A/T III's:
View attachment 284450
View attachment 284451

Which were rated really well on TireRack, and that has served us well with the Conti's we have on the RAM that we are quite pleased with.

It DOES have a limited slip rear end, so I do expect that he's going to (try to?) take it places I probably wouldn't, lol.

He needs to change the power steering fluid and I think we need to clean the IAC. 22 year old vehicles, lol. I had him pick up 3ft of 3/8ths fuel line the other day and we replaced all the dry rotted vacuum lines (EVAP and breather) that were collapsing and ready to leak.
I dont think that a bad All Terrain pattern is a thing. They all have strengths and weaknesses. I thought about a cheaper alternative on my jeep than the BFGs as per my normal. Ill bet those Toyos would do good in snow.....snowflake rating or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom