wemay
Site Donor 2023
No, I've almost always done so with turbocharged engines due to their high compression. I know the manual says 87 or higher. I might try another tankful of 87 down the line.You use 93 in the Malibu to prevent lspi?
No, I've almost always done so with turbocharged engines due to their high compression. I know the manual says 87 or higher. I might try another tankful of 87 down the line.You use 93 in the Malibu to prevent lspi?
Makes sense to be on the safe side I suppose.No, I've almost always done so with turbocharged engines due to their high compression. I know the manual says 87 or higher. I might try another tankful of 87 down the line.
Ford swore up and down on all they considered to be good and pure and holy that my intermittent cam phaser issue on my 2018 F150 5.0 was spark knock (PINGGGGGGG) until I managed to get a few good clear seconds of it on video. They couldn't deny it after that.The only modern vehicle I've ever heard audible/real pinging was my son's Focus that has an aftermarket 93 octane tune and he was running 87 - duh. I'm not sure most folks that started driving after ECUs/knock sensors even know what pinging sounds like b/c it really doesn't happen b/c the ECUs are so good. Our Lexus RX350/takes premium...runs perfectly on 87 for daily use. If you are hearing audible knock that is bad and I'm sure your pistons look like something that someone with tryphobia would gag looking at.
Also, cars don't call for 87, they call for a fuel with a min. octane rating of 87, you can run what you want and *may* see benefits running premium...I bought from a mpg anyone can show the slight bump, if even there, counters the additional cost/gal of using a premium gas.
Only available at the Airfield around here for big bucks.
Even my GDi Accord non turbo in this extreme weather of heat gets 89 TT and then I might go back and forth with 87. Occasionally I find 93 or higher and will atleast top of with it. Like to have the avg Octane number around 88+.Not sure about that engine in particular but most enrichen for knock and get worse MPG and fuel dilution. Premium well worth it.
Ha truth! I mean, my mom had an '87 Camry when I was in HS and I drove it...if you didn't run at least 89 it pinged like crazy, I remember making it do it b/c it was funny....just lug it and ping-a-ling-a-ping! E-free is dumb IMHO on any modern vehicle. E is the way for knock resistnace and it doesn't hurt a thing...10% E....the mpg difference isn't enough for anyone to notice.Ford swore up and down on all they considered to be good and pure and holy that my intermittent cam phaser issue on my 2018 F150 5.0 was spark knock (PINGGGGGGG) until I managed to get a few good clear seconds of it on video. They couldn't deny it after that.
I don't think many people who really have started driving in just the last 15 years or so really understands what true ping sounds like.
They told me REPEATEDLY to use hi-test because I was hearing PINGGGGGGGGGING. I did, for a while - even though the old amn in me who knew what ping really sounds like was positive that they were wrong. They only thing hi-test did for me was increase a tank of gas by 20$
I also tried ethanol free (huge waste of money, and I tried that in my Mustang for quite some time also) and on a vacation I ran about 4 tanks of E85. The only noticeable difference was on E85.
E85 does give a nice little noticeable jolt on my 2.7 eco - but it's not available where I live. Plus, I need a noticeable jolt on top of what I normally get out of 87 E10 in that motor like I need an extra rectum. I generally run 2 tanks of hi-test right now about every 6 months or so back to back. Why? Because it MIGHT clean stuff up a bit. It also might not. But I do it anyways. And with a 36 gallon tank, I'm out about 70$ for what I know is probably placebo effect.
Just took a trip in our Atlas, 1K miles, 87 in that GDI non-turbo VR6 through the mountains in 90+ deg F heat and it said hold my beer, I didn't note any issues.Even my GDi Accord non turbo in this extreme weather of heat gets 89 TT and then I might go back and forth with 87. Occasionally I find 93 or higher and will atleast top of with it. Like to have the avg Octane number around 88+.
Yes, to this.My 2011 Ford Ranger pickup has the dreaded 4.0 SOHC and I use nothing but premium. This has been a topic on the Ranger forums. The truck has 155,000+ miles.
The 4.0 engine was made by Ford Germany and designed to take higher-octane gasoline. Ford put a knock sensor on these engines in US applications and instructed owners that regular fuel is just fine. The problem is that the knock sensor is constantly retarding the timing when regular is used, which isn't optimum for smoothness, economy, or for those sensitive timing-chain cartridges and tensioners. The knock sensor is detecting what? Knocking, right? Knocking does what? Causes damage over time, right?
It was easy to tell a difference when using premium. The engine runs a lot smoother, acceleration is better, and the economy is better, especially on the highway. I'm talking as much as 24 miles/US gallon on premium at 60–70 mph v. only about 20 on regular (which was the EPA highway rating). Just took a trip to Pennsylvania doing 70+ with the air conditioning on most of the way and got 23.6 mpg, all on premium.
Well it doesn't have 350,000 miles on it either...Just took a trip in our Atlas, 1K miles, 87 in that GDI non-turbo VR6 through the mountains in 90+ deg F heat and it said hold my beer, I didn't note any issues.
Mine averages 36-38 MPG on 87. Are you doing any better with 93?No, I've almost always done so with turbocharged engines due to their high compression. I know the manual says 87 or higher. I might try another tankful of 87 down the line.
Nope. Only Hampton Air Field in a 25 miles radius of me. I don't count a Tractor supply store that sells cans of VP for 30 dollars a gallon.according to pure-gas.org NH has 58 stations with E0
I do a lot of hwy and don’t have a lead foot. XOM 87 seems to do pretty for my use case.Wow! That's great. The issue with me is i remote start due to the heat lately and also idle some waiting in the elementary school pickup train line. LOL.
My best on 93 is 30mpg/tank, almost all city. I will give 87 a try. Your numbers impress me.
3.55:1 because the truck has the factory tow package. That was the standard axle ratio with that package. The truck has plenty of punch with that rear axle ratio. On the Ranger forums a popular modification is to get a lower (numerically higher) ratio with an axle or differential swap, but I don't see the need.Yes, to this.
Which axle ratio have you, K-Man?
Ranger owners praised "regular gas".
Then I saw the knock sensor and KNEW our SOHCs didn't "run on regular", they, "didn't knock on regular".
Summer driving in hilly terrain is better with premium gas in the tank. The engine advances and actually exhibits pep.
It's not "the dreaded 4.0 SOHC", but I will say the "universal head" design which requires engine removal to address the right timing cassette is plainly stupid.
+1 for 87. My wife's 2020 Equinox w/ 1.5L gets 32-33mpg on average, with mixed driving, mostly suburban with minimal traffic and plenty of stoplights. I've only run TT 87 in her car, usually Shell, XOM, or QuikTrip.Wow! That's great. The issue with me is i remote start due to the heat lately and also idle some waiting in the elementary school pickup train line. LOL.
My best on 93 is 30mpg/tank, almost all city. I will give 87 a try. Your numbers impress me.
Turbo = HEAT = PremiumTurbo = premium.