Suggest best car for frequent long trips

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite
But really, Ive owned over 65 cars and it took me 5 mins to get the thing in D after reversing out of the dealer parking spot.


It took you five minutes to put a Camry in Drive? Seriously: wow.
 
OP checking in.

And... yesterday, a familiar sight greeted the bride as she operated the Beetle. The Check Engine Light illuminated and stayed so. Nice. Scan says faulty glow plug on #3 cylinder.
 
Originally Posted By: ekpolk


It's too bad that we can't all get our seats custom poured from foam of our back doc's prescription for just the right firmness of foam. My Camry could be every bit the dog that ARCO-G thinks it is, and I'd still love it for the seat. I could go on about how comfortable it is, but I'd probably commit an RSP violation...
wink.gif

I may have the same body type. Im 6'1" with 33" inseam (good luck finding pants that length off the rack!). I am strangely comfortable in the Yaris 3 door seats, though I find I have to keep them not reclined much and get the steering wheel angle just right. I tend to like my wheel tilted up more than most folks(as i have shattered wrists). I have a hard time getting comfortable in the Subaru Forester. Those seats have poor lumbar support. But as with any seat that has myriad adjustment, it may take time and continual adjusting to get them in a good place. I wish seat adjustments had number readout associated with each variable so you could recall the setting after someone messes with them. My old 93 lincoln markviii had his and hers key fob that recalled seat, mirror, steering wheel, climate, and radio settings and position!
 
Originally Posted By: LoneRanger
OP checking in.

And... yesterday, a familiar sight greeted the bride as she operated the Beetle. The Check Engine Light illuminated and stayed so. Nice. Scan says faulty glow plug on #3 cylinder.


That is typical for the unreliable Beetle. My friends wife had a 05 and in 07 traded it in for a Focus. She took a beating in the trade but was just happy to unload that ugly unreliable car. The Beetle was at the dealer at least 60 times with problems. The Focus is running just fine.
 
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite

There is no debate, you can easily CALCULATE the HP the engine is making at the RPM range I mentioned. and the Hyundai would indeed make well less than 100HP and that would be at full throttle. You only need about 20-30 HP to maintain a crusing speed of 60. How many drivers would you guess require WOT to maintain speed on a highway? the 200HP 4-cylinder braggin rights are "unusable power". How much time do you spend at 6000 rpm with the car floored? Almost ZILCH. So the Ford V8 torque and HP are accessable on a daily basis(1000-4000rpm), and helpfull to speed the car down the interstate at 70 MPH at 1500 rpm. Wherein lies the fuel milage secret of the GMQ/CV - low rpm due to steep OD and tall rear gearing. I rented a pretty old CV years ago for a trip from NH to New Jersey. I got 29 MPG going ~ 70-75 on the interstate. NO [censored]. IIRC I had a hyundai Accent at the time (3 door) and NO WAY was I going to take my wife and a weeks worth of luggage in that trap to NJ. Accent worked fine as a 20 mile 1-way commuter and daily run about. Look at the cars in my sig. I am NOT big car biased.


You extremely off base because if anyone only designed a car to have usable power at redline it wouldn't sell period.

The engine is designed to have almost all of it's usable tq in the lower revs and not rev to oblivion to get it. Do you actually think you can WOT a car in high gear and not have the TCM kickdown to a lower gear? You can defend the Crown-vic all you want and but don't go making claims that just because it is a I4 it won't make torque without going to redline. Ideally most cars never see redline and stay in the narrow rev range you noted. The Sonata is no exception but when it has to move it can, much quicker than the Crown-vic/GMQ. I noted the maximum power because when push did come to shove climbing a steep grade the Sonata would have NO problem doing it. HP is all that matters when you have to climb a hill like that and you are already moving. TQ only matters starting from a low gear & at low speed. Even the CV/GMQ would to kick out of 4th to 3rd.

I really don't know why you'd even mention an Accent as we are taking a midsize not compact(I used to own one myself BTW).

The Sonata is as big inside as a CV/GMQ, gets better fuel economy, safer in many ways, and comes with a warranty. The only plus on the CV/GMQ side is cost.

So think what you want but IMO the CV/GMQ is not the "best" highway car. There are plenty better ones depending on your price range.
 
Originally Posted By: Nick R
Something no VW owner should be without....
grin2.gif


28bd574.jpg



I have a t-shirt with that on it.

text underneath

"It's a way of life"

lol.gif
 
Maybe it's a new design to keep us elderly folk from going anywhere in the beast! Really, the copycat Jaguar/mercedes gated automatic doesnt do anything to help the demographic drive this car. I can see Grandma going down the interstate in 2 instead of D. Just the advent of the OD button confused the populace. Also I cant wait for center stack type designs to go away. My right knee will appreciate it. I fear they are here to stay due to safety regulation.
 
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite
But really, Ive owned over 65 cars and it took me 5 mins to get the thing in D after reversing out of the dealer parking spot.


It took you five minutes to put a Camry in Drive? Seriously: wow.



Yeah I know right? what`s up with that one?
 
It seemed like five but was probably 1. But I had the car reversed into the access road and was getting frustrated. Donning my glasses so I could read the gate markings solved the problem - but it wasnt intuitive. When I got home I studied the gate markings a bit more and figured it out. This was an SE "sport" with 18 Al wheels and ground effects aeropackage on the front and sides. NEVER had this problem before in any rental/loaner - oh, wait, maybe the VW semi-auto in a Superbeetle in the 70's ..... or was that a 412 ... or type-3 fastback .... ?
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: brianl703
Here's how you put most cars in drive:

From reverse, slide lever backwards till it stops. You're in drive. No need to even look down.




LOL
 
That is a pretty ridiculous looking shifter. Can't understand why they can't all be like on the mustang, my car, jeep etc. It's straight back, PRND(L, or 3,2,1)

OP: OOC what did she say about the suggestion of a focus?
 
Last edited:
It's amazing to me how BITOGers apparently find a shifter so hard to use, a shifter that is standard in vehicles that are sold so prolifically, and vehicles that are sold to a demographic that is likely older folks and women (lots of women buy Camrys). It's almost exactly the same in layout to the shifter in my mother-in-law's Acura TL, which she can also use without putting on eyeglasses! LOL Maybe what they say is true: women really are smarter than men!

1103d1204688771-custom-short-shifter-automatic-112_0405_sedans_11s-2004_acura_tl-shifter_view.jpg


I guess if the detraction that generates the most fuss about a car is its shifter design, it must be a pretty solid vehicle...
wink.gif
 
Nick, I like the Focus and my father has owned several. They've been reliable, handle well, and inexpensive to own. But, they are also very noisy! At least previous generations were. My wife always remarks that it sounds like you're riding inside a tin can when she travels in my dad's car. Quiet is very nice, especially on longer trips.
 
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd

I guess if the detraction that generates the most fuss about a car is its shifter design, it must be a pretty solid vehicle...
wink.gif



That's only the most obvious detraction in the car, which can be seen from a photo. A photo doesn't tell you how it drives, handles, accelerates, what it's like to change the oil on, etc.

I'm sure I could find a lot more to complain about on any of those cars if I had one for a few hours.
 
My previous car was a stick, but thanks for your comment anyway, and for dodging my point that many cars share this design and only you guys seem to have a problem with it.
smirk2.gif
 
"Many" cars share that design? I don't think so. "Some" do. "Many" have the standard design.

This "wow, it's like you're driving a manual...well...sort of.." design is just an example of form being more important than function.

Quote:
My previous car was a stick


Two of my current cars are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom