Start up wear, Normal wear, and the relation to various oil properties. SAE 2006-01-3414

Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
1,616
Location
Sarasota, Florida
What tweaked me: Somebody referred to the “Taxicab Study” once again to defend the use of thicker oils on a recent thread.

So I Think it is time to bring this up again, From:
Effect of Lubricant Properties and Lubricant Degradation on Piston Ring and Cylinder Bore Wear in a Spark-Ignition Engine, Schneider et al.

First some definitions are important. Most automotive engine research uses the term Cold Engine to mean room temperature, 70-75F. It is not some freezing temperature. People may admit that engine wear is accelerated at cooler temperatures but they think it is below freezing, that is probably far worse. So when the reasearch paper makes a statement as the wear rate is more when the engine is cold they mean at room temperature.
The definition of warm up period. It is the time it takes for the oil to reach the steady state operating temperature. It occurs much slower than the heating of the coolant. Under high load it is usually at least a 15 minute period and slowly rises over this time from the room temperature “cold” start.
Once reached, the steady state oil temperature was regulated to 248F. The engines were varied. There was low load and varying RPM and high load and varying RPM.
Fully formulated oils were used except where the ZDDP level was formulated to be zero.

This research is made more relevant by actually using V-6 engines for wear testing - 1999 GM 3.4-L 60 degree block. And the radiotracer method of wear detection has been shown to be very accurate. No need for a tear down that is actually less accurate unless very long and hard engine use is forced. This study is for cylinder and ring wear, the location where most engines fail if properly manufactured and maintained. I believe most working engines are retired (or rebuilt) because of low compression. And sometimes without replacement of the bearings. The author states that cylinder wear and ring wear are perhaps the best areas to test oil and wear for engine longevity. Note this is in vivo testing, not some 4 ball lab test.

Conclusions, and there were a handful as this was a very far reaching study:

Steady state wear is very low except when changing to high load and RPM conditions, the rise is moderate. I think they used the word insignificant for wear at steady state and low loads.

Lubricants ranging from SAE 0W10 to SAE 10W40 had similar rates of wear (their wording, not mine). In the text they stated there was no trend in wear rates related to viscosity.

Lubricants that were aged with 16,000 normally driven miles were compared to fresh lubricants and had similar rates of wear. (There are some people who show evidence that fresh new oil can result in more wear than with older oil in your engine).

Fully formulated synthetic and mineral based lubricants had similar rates of wear.

When a hot, loaded running engine, is artificially cooled by gradually lowering the coolant and engine oil temperature from the steady state operating temperature to room temperature the wear rates gradually go up at the same rate. They end up being 10x higher at room temperature. Mind you it is still not that high overall. Let me digress. If something is said to be 10x worse you have to know the exact context. For example: If some medication causes an adverse effect that goes from 1 in 10M to 10 in 10M it is still very low. Even though it is 10X worse making it sound really, really bad. But if the adverse effect goes from 1 in 100 people to 10/100 people - Houston, we have a problem. So a statement saying that something is 10x better or 10x worse is meaningless without further explanation.

I find this really interesting: Wear rates were “only” 2x higher when the same oil had the ZDDP completely removed from the fully formulated oil - levels were originally at 0.10% ZDDP.

Wear is related to RPM and load. Load makes a much larger difference than RPM. Wear is 6 to 10X higher with increasing load and RPM. But again, the actual amount of wear is still considered low. Once the steady state oil temperature is reached the wear rate is almost nothing for the low load condition at 2000 RPM.

I did have discussions with Dr. Schneider regarding this research.
This thread was written with permission from Dr. Eric Schneider.


FYI: I will discuss the “Taxi Test” next. Many people refer to this study.

ali
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One would not expect there to be a significant difference in wear when cold due to grade. All grades are very thick even at room temperature and have a high MOFT to protect the components.

Goes to prove that lower-viscosity oils do nothing to prevent startup wear nor does it show that this operating region is the source of most wear. Of course there is "cold start" wear but it is not mitigated nor reduced by low-viscosity oils. That's the goofy postulate we hear on here many times.
 
Last edited:
One would not expect there to be a significant difference in wear when cold due to grade. All grades are very thick even at room temperature and have a high MOFT to protect the components.

Goes to prove that lower-viscosity oils do nothing to prevent startup wear nor does it show that this operating region is the source of most wear. Of course there is "cold start" wear but it is not mitigated nor reduced by low-viscosity oils. That's the goofy postulate we hear on here many times.
This brings up a thought I’ve had regarding start-up. I wonder if an inexpensive engine block heater would help to mitigate this type of wear. 🧐
 
The winter rating is not start up temperature. (40 c) What you really want is that immediate start wear rate.

 
Once reached, the steady state oil temperature was regulated to 248F. The engines were varied. There was low load and varying RPM and high load and varying RPM.
Fully formulated oils were used except where the ZDDP level was formulated to be zero.

Lubricants that were aged with 16,000 normally driven miles were compared to fresh lubricants and had similar rates of wear. (There are some people who show evidence that fresh new oil can result in more wear than with older oil in your engine).
Isn't oil temperature more typically 200-220F? I guess that doesn't change anything but just saying.

And to the later quoted point, the inverse is also true, you do not gain anything by changing an oil sooner.
 

Does Start Up Wear Really Exist​


Yes, I know this for a fact. Happens to me every morning when I get up.

images
 
As noted in the OP's post, wear due to temperature is lowest once the oil is at operating temperature. Block heaters help with cranking.
Besides, wouldn’t it actually be detrimental if all one was heating was the oil, and it was brought fully to operating temperature and then the cold engine was started? There’s kind of an inverse reaction as engines warm up; the oil becomes thinner and the clearances close up a little and stabilize. Starting with maximum clearances and minimal oil viscosity sounds like a bad idea.
 
Besides, wouldn’t it actually be detrimental if all one was heating was the oil, and it was brought fully to operating temperature and then the cold engine was started? There’s kind of an inverse reaction as engines warm up; the oil becomes thinner and the clearances close up a little and stabilize. Starting with maximum clearances and minimal oil viscosity sounds like a bad idea.
Good question. I don't think a pan warmer or block heater gets the oil anywhere near operating temperature. On a -10 F day my bet is a pan warmer might get the oil to about 50F give or take. A block heater doesn't even move the temperature needle in my van, but it does warm up a lot faster. FTR I know it works I've checked it.
 
"Goes to prove that lower-viscosity oils do nothing to prevent startup wear nor does it show that this operating region is the source of most wear. Of course there is "cold start" wear but it is not mitigated nor reduced by low-viscosity oils. That's the goofy postulate we hear on here many times."

That depends. For some reason there are cars that limit RPM until the engine oil gets up to temperature. There must be a reason for this.

Personally I pay less attention to 100C and HTHS viscosities. I am most concerned with the 40C viscosity. I want it as low as possible so I feel comfortable running up the RPM in the cold engine (room temperatures here in Florida). I like high RPM and when engines are cool they go into bypass too soon. I have more on that one -but for another day...

Ali
 
Besides, wouldn’t it actually be detrimental if all one was heating was the oil, and it was brought fully to operating temperature and then the cold engine was started? There’s kind of an inverse reaction as engines warm up; the oil becomes thinner and the clearances close up a little and stabilize. Starting with maximum clearances and minimal oil viscosity sounds like a bad idea.
And yet in the paper I site they cooled the oil down from a hot engine, thickening the oil, and the wear rate went up.

Ali
 
Back
Top