Yes, but if space is being warped as a part of their drive, they REALLY aren't traveling that fast relative to their position within their space envelope, so no crazy intertia related SQUISHING would occur. It only appears that way to an observer OUTSIDE of that space envelope.
Except the law against warping space/time. Hague Convention of 1917, you know...
What's the article you're talking about? The ones that are mentioned have problems with using negative energy which doesn't exist or if you use positive energy the sums required amount to a percentage of the sun or greater. Or if you use less energy the bubble is much smaller. Theory is great but it probably can't be built. There's also theories about how with hawking radiation you could use a mini black hole to power your space ship. But making one isn't that easy, you may need a ring collider about 1,000 light years in diameter. You other issue is of course if you do exceed the speed of light with whatever method you have, the formulas for speed basically say you go back in time and you can't go back in time.
en.wikipedia.org
Lol...hey there chief, why don't you step down off your Trekky soap box and please pardon my ignorance of Star Trek and other fictional propulsion systems. I will admit I tend to deal in reality and not science fiction but I'm not the only one who thought warp drive described superluminal travel! Anyway, you have an entire Wiki page that disagrees with you but I will bow out of that discussion because it's not real.
Let us not forget that 150 years ago we were still using horses to plant food. With that being said and the advances we have made in that time, well, I really don't think we could have done it that fast without help.
One question for you though. If we needed help to advance, who made the aliens so smart?
The proof isnt murky at all, its right there in your face. Re-read my post, for some reason people go off on aliens but a UFO doesnt mean an alien, it is an unidentified flying object. A UFO is something the person reporting it and supporting factual images can not be identified. For all we know it can be our own military or that of another.
This is how I feel about it. It seemed like technology slowly but steadily advanced until about WWII, and then took off like a rocket.
The only answer I would have is someone helped them.
Back in the earlier days of SPY, one of our maintenance checks was called "sphere track." We sent a metal ball about the size of a softball up tied to a Helium balloon, 80 miles was the criteria for a SAT check. It is an amazing RADAR...but it is not designed to track objects which have kinematics which fall outside the possibilities of airborne objects which reside on planet Earth. The RSC operator is the only person who would have "seen it" because it is common to run CND (command & decision) doctrine which keeps "zoomer tracks" out of the composite picture which is displayed to all the other watch station consoles. It could have been recorded if they were running the "war diary" data recordings though it would have only appeared in the SPY recordings.
Right, other people keep mentioning aliens. It's a UFO in the sense that it's unidentified.
And I also wonder what makes them qualified to be Ancient Alien Theorists. Sorta like calling yourself a bigfoot expert.
CG59 is SPY-1B equipped and BMD capable. Would be interesting to know the atmospherics (ducting) for the day and how far from land they were when this happened. Kinda sounds like they may have been in plane guard for the CVN.
