Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
All the old tales are still persisting.
But the facts are that the mfgrs have dealt with the age old 'bottom' issue in a conclusive way.
You will not hurt any modern car by running it low on fuel. You also will never empty the tank completely.
What years "modern" starts? I have a 92 Corolla and 2002 Accord. Would 2002 Accord considered modern since it is only 10 years old and the engine is pristine. I know folks Americans think it is too old now even though its engine is probably in better than their 2-3 years old cars that only get oil changed at hooffy lube every 7.5k miles using low quality conventional and not all oil is changed since hooffy has to get each car out the door under 15 minutes while still being able to top all fluids and clean the windshields.
All the old tales are still persisting.
But the facts are that the mfgrs have dealt with the age old 'bottom' issue in a conclusive way.
You will not hurt any modern car by running it low on fuel. You also will never empty the tank completely.
What years "modern" starts? I have a 92 Corolla and 2002 Accord. Would 2002 Accord considered modern since it is only 10 years old and the engine is pristine. I know folks Americans think it is too old now even though its engine is probably in better than their 2-3 years old cars that only get oil changed at hooffy lube every 7.5k miles using low quality conventional and not all oil is changed since hooffy has to get each car out the door under 15 minutes while still being able to top all fluids and clean the windshields.