review: 2000 buick century

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
40,453
Location
ME
Got one of these about a month and a half back, and have been working the kinks out.

Could not be much worse than the day I got it at the tow yard. Was a literal see-the-ad-on-craigslist-run-over experience. PO's cell phone rang with another buyer literally as he handed me the title.

"Test drive" was going back three feet then hitting the e-brake as the hydraulic brakes were completely shot. Had been sitting in grass for a year. Rocker panels are also shot and the floor pan had light surface rust and peely paint. (I wirebrushed, rust converted, and undercoated all this.)

I had it towed home by the tow company after I outbid their mechanics who wanted it "for parts" (yeah right) by $50. Figured I'd throw some business their way. To register and apply for a title, needed the odometer reading, impossible as it was not lighting up. Turns out it's a known problem and I resoldered some resistors in the cluster. 119k miles. Pleasant surprise.

I ran all new brake and fuel lines so I could start driving it and pass a state inspection. Despite bleeding them the normal way I still had a soft pedal. Had my mechanic bleed the ABS with his scan tool to no difference. Discovered uneven front pad wear and pins bottoming out, so all new brakes (with AA coupons!) got them tolerable... just tolerable. Rear drums are adjusted and everything. Brake feel quality is 3/10.

Car came with a jug of deathcool in the trunk. I got some IM gaskets upon this observation and they're sitting on my garage shelf for now. Oil looked okay. Overflow looks nasty with caked goo all over its inside. I did a thermostat, what a nasty design, behind an exhaust crossover. In fact I did it twice as it slipped out of position as I was tightening the bolts the first time and leaked. This gave me the opportunity to introduce my "free" dexcool and a little prestone universal.

Car has a good case of the typical 3100 cold start rap/knock as well.

Just took a mostly highway trip and it turned in 27.6 MPG. By comparison my 1992 cutlass ciera with bigger 3300 and 3 speed auto gave me 29. The buick is HEAVY, 3400 lbs or so. The old A-bodies were 2750 if memory serves.

The car is geared real tall for economy. Starting off in 1st is sluggish. Even going 55 if one hits a slight hill it unlocks the TCC or downshifts, very busy with the trans. Has that PWM TCC which is smooth, yes, but it bothers me not knowing what it's doing. I'm one of those stick shift drivers who trys to "will" an automatic into behaving, by nursing it up hills to avoid downshifting, etc. There's no tach and my scan tool says 1800 RPM at 65 MPH. I feel if it could stick to this, somewhere flat, it could get super mileage. The design looks aerodynamically slippery enough.

The trunk is deep.

Car has ABS, traction control, rare for something of mine. Applies the spinning wheel's brake for TC, I'm looking forward to testing this when it snows soon. Most older TCs just cut engine power, something I can do. Came with great all seasons, skinny 205/70/15 and the car is heavy, so I have hopes for it in the snow.

Headlights are more tolerable than my olds silhouette it's replacing, but so would be a jar of lightning bugs. They might need a little aiming.

There's about a foot of air space between the front bumper and the motor, so if I PIT someone in anger I should make it home. (Space for the 3.8 they put in regals) Rear spark plugs look like something to do from below on ramps, or undo the dogbones and roll the motor.

Dang thing keeps throwing a P0440 EVAP leak. Has super-duper-low-emissions for Cali/Northeast. This could relate to the rusty filler neck, that, like its W-body cousin Intrigue I had, seems to be unprotected steel. If you have one of these cars, treat its neck well, protect it somehow.

Checking the RPO codes show this to be an AVIS special; a call-for-help sticker in the trunk confirms this.

The door seals are quiet and it doesn't rattle. Different from my A-body ciera and its 1982 tech: the rattliest car I ever owned. The radio volume knob has notchy detents and it goes from whisper quiet to too loud in one notch... insane. Has inch high numbers for farsighted geezers. Comparably the speedo is a teeny tiny thing and it reads SLOW by a MPH at 65. I do appreciate the green "cruise" light when it's engaged. The interior people at buick sat around designing about 30 idiot lights so this would be good for a teenager. Has low coolant, overheat, low oil, low tire (ABS speed sensors, not TPMS), door/trunk ajar, low fuel, along with the regular lights we know and expect.

I looked at this and thought, boy, a mini-lesabre... but this has been cheapened too much. If you have any choice get a lesabre for better build and no MPG penalty.
 
My buddy had a 1987 Buick Century (2.8 V-6, 4-speed auto) he 'shared' with his mom for years, and then owned outright for it's last threee years. I spent a good chunk of time in that car.

Without going into detail about that car, I WILL say that you are right about the observation about the car in snow - the skinny tires and heavy weight DO work on this car. I'm not exagerrating, my buddy's was absolutely un-stoppable in any kind of snow condition.

Got any pics?
 
Great review. Question - do you actually make money on your efforts given the time commitment and efforts put in? Seems like you are moving cars all the time.

What happened to the 240D?
 
I'd get all the Dexcool out of there, flush well with distilled water, and refill with the Prestone All Makes All Models stuff. I have had the brown Dexcool sludge in my Impala, though so far I don't seem to have the IM leak. The sludge just gets worse with time as long as you're running Dexcool.
 
What happened to the van? Rustitis?
Its too bad these cars aren't that great, they seem to be super cheap around here in good shape, but I guess its for a reason.
 
Sold the 240d and I actually kind of miss it more than most. I was trying to raise money for a saturn VUE but even 8 year old ones of those are $4k and weren't in the greatest shape. The Century has the same interior space as the 240d. I wanted a family road-trip car like the silhouette van it replaced. But jeez that van got 26 MPG at 75 MPH with the AC on, not far from this turkey.

The 240d had a wind whistle that probably could have been fixed with all new weatherstripping, a frightful price tag, but it also got excited sounding above 60 MPH. With the valves adjusted and new filters the 240D got 34 MPG, even with the price difference between gas and diesel it beats the buick. The benz also rode super. Sometimes in life we just screw up. Oh the benz's rocker panels were solid enough to use the factory jack holes to lift by. Wife absolutely refused to drive the 240d. Among 2 kids we have 4 car seats and it's a bit of a bother to move them. So we're trying to sort out a commuting car or two, a kid hauler, a utility vehicle, without selling either completely awesome saturn s-series. My 3 year old kicks my seat in the saturns.
wink.gif


I have no other hobbies and am not above getting something ridiculous like a volvo wagon with a small block chevy. That ought to haul the kids.

The van was giving me the vibe of "something's gonna blow" after 19 months of ownership, but I at least got out of it at enough of a profit to have paid for its registration and insurance (and the initial purchase.) So was I flipping it or kinda sorta using it? I got it to see if as a family we were "van people". With one sliding door loading kids into car seats was sort of a hassle, so we're not "van people" unless it has another door. And rust. I hit a bump on a road trip then found the air compressor for the rear shocks hanging underneath; its bracket just gave out. Ripped it off with my bare hands and showed the wife then tossed it in a trash can at a truck stop.

I also sort of hated the idea of doing any work on the rear of that V6 in the van. Even though it's the same motor (shape) in the century at least there isn't half a cowl hanging over it. Sold the van before getting its replacement, which at the time I had planned on being an inline 4 cyl, stick shift, cute ute.

When I buy a car I look for something distressed so I can add value. The van had a stuck open fuel injector so it was flooding and missing, and leaky rear air shocks, that for some reason ran the compressor with the key off, and the battery was aways dying on the PO.
 
From a styling standpoint they look sort of respectible in a bland way. At least the headlights don't swoop up the fenders trying to touch the A-pillars like modern cars.

DSCN7189.jpg


Here's how I redneck fix rusty rockers, hey it at least seals them out. Silicone caulk is my "body panel gap filler." I didn't like the bright green rustoleum on my first attempt so I just undercoated all way around. It also helps hide the rivet heads:

DSCN7188.jpg

DSCN7187.jpg


Indylan I have a saturn wagon that I love to tears! If the world runs out of them I might just have to get a focus. The 2000s are a bad decade for small wagons, we lost the corolla and for a while the elantra too.

My Dad was onto something with his 1980 Fairmont wagon: Midsize, stick shift, inline 6, decent handling for the day: first midsize with rack & pinion steering. Even trick aftermarket parts for the Mustang fit. I'd consider a saturn L series wagon but they only put the ecotec 4 cyl and stick shift in sedans. Aaaargh! The wagon got the weird Opel 3 liter and automatic.
 
Actually there are LW200's with manuals up here too! trader.ca has two of them in Canada right now, one in QC and one in AB.
It probably would be worth some investigation to see if there are any significant saturn only parts on a rare combonation like this, I bet there was only a few hundred ever sold in Canada. Probably its identical under the body to the manual sedans though.
 
It would take less to make a ecotec-stick shift LW300 than it would to make a 383 stroker Volvo, LOL.

Remember the Ford Taurus MT5 from the late 80s? Now, form of a wagon, LOL. Or a SHO, just kidding, a little high-maintenance.
 
I had to look up what a MT5 is/was... Seems kind of funny to have the special badging but I guess it was a rare person who asked for a manual Taurus. I wonder what mileage it actually got?
 
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
I had to look up what a MT5 is/was... Seems kind of funny to have the special badging but I guess it was a rare person who asked for a manual Taurus. I wonder what mileage it actually got?


Wow - I forgot about those! I worked in a Ford dealership from '85-'91 and I remember them selling a handful of these and seeing the "MT-5" badging. I never liked the buzzy 4 cylinder in the Taurus (an OHV tempo engine upsized to 2.5 liters) as they were underpowered with the 3 speed Tempo/Escort "ATX" automatic. The 5 speed manual at least made them tolerable.

My favorite powertrain for the Taurus back then was the 3.0 Vulcan with the AXOD overdrive automatic. The 3.8 really wasn't needed and it made servicing more difficult. It would also do a better job beating up on the questionable AXOD tranny. The 3.0 Yamaha V6 in the SHO was a work of art but looked like a nightmare to work on if anything major happened. They also ate clutches. As my boss said at the time: "The car was really designed to have the 3.0 V6, not the 3.8 or the SHO V6."

Incidentally, the EPA web site lists the 1987 MT-5 wagon at 19 city, 27 highway - only 1 MPG better than the Vulcan 3.0 on the highway.
 
Originally Posted By: eljefino
Car has ABS, traction control, rare for something of mine. Applies the spinning wheel's brake for TC, I'm looking forward to testing this when it snows soon. Most older TCs just cut engine power, something I can do. Came with great all seasons, skinny 205/70/15 and the car is heavy, so I have hopes for it in the snow.


It sounds like it works the same as the TCS in the Northstar Cadillacs. If it performs the same, the car should be a tank in the snow. The Cadillac's TCS is as close to the equivalent of a limited slip differential as you'll have without actually having one. You could floor it up a hill on ice or snow and it didn't matter, the car would just charge right up. Even on Michelin Pilot tires.

With the skinny 15s and a decent tread pattern for snow, coupled with the TCS, the Century should be close to unstoppable.
 
If it wears the same 205/70-15 tires my LeSabre wears, it'll be a tank in snow. Even with bald all-seasons, that car goes in the snow. With good all-seasons, it was fine. A friend's Bonneville and current Grand Prix both had snow tires in that size. Even a fresh snowfall didn't matter to those cars. The only time they were stopped was when there was 10+ inches on the ground.

The 3100 in that car makes it underpowered, IMO. Much better with the 3800's 205 hp, 230 ft/lbs in a car that weighs as much as the Century.
 
Originally Posted By: sciphi
If it wears the same 205/70-15 tires my LeSabre wears, it'll be a tank in snow. Even with bald all-seasons, that car goes in the snow. With good all-seasons, it was fine. A friend's Bonneville and current Grand Prix both had snow tires in that size. Even a fresh snowfall didn't matter to those cars. The only time they were stopped was when there was 10+ inches on the ground.

The 3100 in that car makes it underpowered, IMO. Much better with the 3800's 205 hp, 230 ft/lbs in a car that weighs as much as the Century.


Yes. A friends 96(?) Le Sabre was an absolute tank in the snow... quite amazing.
 
I have a 2002 Century which is basically the same car. Yes, it is GREAT in the snow. I have never gotten stuck regardless of what tire I'm running. I regularly average over 30 mpg on highway trips while 22 to 23 is the norm for all around driving.
I did a best tank of 34 mpg (with the rest being 32ish) on a trip to NC a few years ago. The A/C is still ice cold at 123K.
The underside is showing a lot of rust and I've been trying to get ahead of it with Rustoleum Rusty metal primer. I did the I-M gasket at approx. 80K as a precaution and used the Fel-Pro Problem Solver and new bolts. This would be the best time to change the t-stat and plugs since they are a pain to get at otherwise.
I have no doubt that this car can make 200K (as long as the rust is kept in check) because the motor and A/T are very durable and reliable.
All in all this has been a very good car.

Eljefino: Could you explain the filler neck rust thing in more detail? Thanks
 
The W-bodies love to rust their rocker panels for some reason. From what I've heard it's a PITA to replace. I did that job on my H-body LeSabre, and it wasn't fun.

The rubber brake hoses were really corroded on my Buick. Replacing them helped the brake feel and stopping ability quite a bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top